Royreader8812

Members
  • Content

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    N/A

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. LOL, Assad is supported by his people. That is clear. It is also the number one reason he is winning. war hawks are fuming. You are just spitting out the stuff the news told you to say, because that is all you have. The most bewildering thing about your rhetoric, is you fail to see the failures of those pointing the finger. Remember, 15 years of war and turmoil in the middle east, $trillions and no successes. None. Just hundreds of thousands dead, millions displaced and now you have ISIS, refugee crisis, ruined countries. And Assad is the evil guy. well done idiots. Fuck off.
  2. Why don't you tell us who has it then. I have stated that you, me, the international intelligence community and anyone for that matter, could never know for sure who definitely does not have it. Who used it, now that is a different story. The first question is always, who benefits. The least likely person to fall into that category is Assad.
  3. LOL, so you want me to answer a question that not even the US intelligence services knows, and if I can't answer it. You will somehow twist that into a statement means Assad did it. You obviously do not understand the situation in Syria very well, so I am not quite sure how you can continue to ask me questions that I could not possibly know the answer to, leading up to some fucked up conclusion. They all might have it, for all I know. That is not the question here, the question is was it used, and who used it. Assad is winning the war, the rebels are on the run. Peace talks are about to happen and Assad has the support of a majority of Syrians as he is the only hope of retaining a secular nation there. But the idiots that think he is 'the bad guy', want a group of fundamental Wahhabi extremists to take over because Assad is such a bad guy. Tell me again how it would benefit Assad toi kill 70 civilians with chemical weapons...? The media is now showing footage of a little girl pleading for the war to stop, to justify going to war there. What kind of asshole falls for that shit? You are quite clearly a troll so unless you make some sort of sense or show that you have at least a reasonable understanding of the situation. you are not worth one more iota of energy.
  4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGq6aLTOF_I I suggest you all watch this if you wish to continue supporting this madness. This is a UN Peace council briefing after a visit to Syria last year.
  5. You realise there are a number of groups in Syria fighting against Assad. If you think it is just the Syrian government (and Russia) vs ISIS... Then who the hell have the coalition been openly arming and training for the last few years. Do you read or watch the state department briefings? The Moderate rebels that hold the area where the gas was 'released' are allies of the coalition and your money is going to arm them. This is no secret. You might want to clue yourself up on the situation a little better before having such a stance on it. It is nice to see that there are members of congress th\t are stating exactly as I am. Because they are the ones that Trump would have to go through if he is drawn into this and the very same people that stopped Obama from doing so in 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXIJlyxCQyE&feature=youtu.be The anchor looks flabbergasted that he would say and think such things. He speaks absolute sense.
  6. Well, what I would like is a thorough independent investigation to determine that. But with the dogma already set in stone and the policy to back up the knee jerk likely already in place, while the gas is still lingering in the air. It is probably safe to say the tax revenue of many of those in this disussion would be involved. It is akin to the WMD's dogma, but to bring Trump in on the game... I don't think it is going to work,but I am probably being g too hopeful there. But there are a lot of idiots out there. On one hand blaming wahabbist muslims for everything, and on the other not thinking they could have anything to do with this. And want to go in and arm them so they can tople the only secular government in the region. My personal beliefs is that wahabbism has more to do with money and united states foreign policy, than any of you in here would be willing to believe. The 'moderate rebels'are Al Qaeda > Al Nusra > Isis. These entities exist only to serve the foreign policy of the nation's that 'pretend' they are trying to stop them. Russia and Syria have proven that they are not as strong as what the western coalition have made them out to be. That is because they have been feeding them arms and backing them up the entire time. Only a fool would not see this.
  7. Oh it came from the air.... Must have been Russia. There are not several nations illegally bombing in Syria at all, nor was the last chemical attack contained in a ground to ground missile... Great powers of deduction Batman.
  8. Rubbish! They are already winning. And making your team look like amateurs. Only an idiot would believe it would be strategic to kill less than 100 people with chemical weapons, only to face the predictable backlash which in the form of the already widespread 'assumption' that they did it. But there are obviously plenty of idiots out there. Because people don't learn from history. But if course having wahabbist terrorists running the only secular nation in the region is a great idea. They don't have the ability to kill indesciminantly at all... Ffs. What a bunch of morons.
  9. The many that haven't been there, have a vested interest in saying otherwise and run around with the rebels. There us absolutely no reasonable explanation that would suggest Assad and Russia would gain out of such actions. And a significant number of reasons that would benefit the rebels and the plethora of countries that are supporting them. The old Occam's razor.
  10. and which one of those link is conclusive evidence that Assad was responsible? The accusations coming from the people funding and supplying the Rebels? That one UN spokesperson suggesting the evidence is pointing at the rebels, was part of the investigation team.
  11. The replacement jobs don't even exist yet. The problem with societies around the world these days, is the false assumption that growth is needed for progress. In our world, an equilibrium in the economy is the line between recession and depression. There is more than enough resources for everyone, we just need to stop being wankers about it. It simply means our current societies will have to change somehow or another. More likely than not, unfortunately, it probably means violence and death on a large scale. The 1% that have 90% of the world's resources in their hands, will not be willing to give up the gravy train for the benefit of all. And for a peaceful resolution this is what needs to happen.
  12. Good old Wikipedia eh, Did you edit it yourself before posting? Lol. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10039672/UN-accuses-Syrian-rebels-of-chemical-weapons-use.html
  13. So last time Assad was accused of 'using Chemical weapons on his own people' [sic], and the media onslaught backing up those accusations, were used as reason to feed the very people the war on terror was supposed to be killing with more weapons... The resulting investigation found without doubt that the chemical weapons were in fact used by the rebels themselves... The white helmets are also a good indication that the rebels are complicit, the white helmets only operate in rebel controlled territory. They are referred to a civil defense, but in fact there is a real Syrian civil defense that is od in rebel controlled areas. The white helmets and the rebels are part and parcel. The rebels are doing it tough at the moment, O'bomber is out, Trump is still in transition and Russia and Syria have them on the run. How would anyone be so stupid to believe without investigation, that the rebels themselves would not simply do the same thing they did last time. Or that Assad and Russia would use chemical weapons to have such a small impact on their offensive, only to receive condemnation from the world around. The most disturbing aspect of this, and this does not take away from the terrible tragedy of those personally effected, is the media in the west are very quick to point at Russia and Assad with no facts to base their stories on and with the history i have explained above. You would think they would have learned from the past, if they were at all interested in the truth. When the last investigation finished and it was found without a doubt that the rebels had used the chemical weapons, do you think the media retracted their accusations... did they then report in the truth that was found... Of course they didn't. We live is a cruel world full of stupid idiots and fucking assholes. Don't be one of them.
  14. Fo shizzle Just don't use hearsay as evidence and if the investigation leads to another crime, then use the full extent of the law to ensure those responsible for crimes are bought to justice. Tunnel vision is not helpful in such an investigation. In politics those pointing the finger are often complicit.
  15. Once again, any accusation is 'evidence'. Plenty of those getting thrown around. How about facts... Got any? Russia didn't need to hack anything or collude with anyone. The Dems screwed themselves with their own ego, the same applies to the media. Nobody believes any of them any more. People pretend to, like you. But you all know deep down that it is all bullshit. If there was factual evidence of Russian collusion. All things considered we would know by now.