turtlespeed

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    63,487

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by turtlespeed

  2. On 11/2/2020 at 3:02 AM, olofscience said:

    And you think this is hypocritical, when there's still no hard evidence of what has been actually done?

    But you support a president who tweets in support of Texan trump supporters who harass an opposition campaign bus and drive dangerously, trying to stop it or run it off the road. Now those aren't just allegations - the idiot tweets it out for all to see.

    Yes.  Its called free speech.

  3. On 10/31/2020 at 10:03 AM, olofscience said:

    They've been investigating since 2019 and so far, no charges.

    If there was any evidence they should bring charges, no? They should probably do it soon. Trump should have AG Barr bring the charges ASAP, 3 days left!

    No? Then STFU.

    Or - wait until they have the proper paperwork in the proper places and let the investigation proceed.

    Its amazing to see when, and for what an investigation is touted by you guys.  Even more telling is when that investigation should be swept away.

  4. 2 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

    That is the suggestion.

    In the mean time, in the real world, with actual evidence, you had the Secretary of Commerce on the board of directors of a Chinese company while negotiating trade agreements with China. That actually happened.

    Funny enough you don't care about what happened. You care about what some guy says may potentially happen if only his dog hadn't eaten his homework.....

    You should have read just a bit further.

    The same thing That Trump is being vilified for potentially having money being loaned by Russia.  Biden is potentially the recipient of the same kind of deal, only from the Chinese.

    You just like this shiester better.

    Its a pretty hypocritical way for the left to think.

  5. · Edited by turtlespeed

    Back to Hunter and his Father - 

    I wonder if you know that you are just trying to exchange one Grifter for another.

    Looks like Joe wasn't as truthful as he would have us believe.

    https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/tony-bobulinksi-i-have-now-put-myself-in-huge-risk-for-the-sake-of-the-american-people

    Quote

    Sinclair investigative reporter James Rosen has also spoken with a central witness in these allegations, which suggests that former vice president Joe Biden knew more than he has acknowledged about his son's overseas dealings.

    Are you guys going to black ball ABC now?

    Then there is this in the article:

    It was on that night the former business associate of Hunter Biden claimed Democratic nominee Joe Biden knew about his son taking payments from Chinese and Ukrainian companies and strongly suggested he got a kickback.

    Bobulinksi discussed why he feels if elected, Biden would be compromised by the Chinese government and much more in an exclusive interview with Rosen.

    The compromise they have is that in documents that have been well provided to the Senate, to Congress, to the Department of Justice via the FBI that CEFC was effectively loaning money directly to the Biden family.

  6. 11 hours ago, phantomII said:

    That Mitch Mcconnell called Justice Barrett a political asset, speaks volumes of the republican view of your judicial system.

    Just because Pelosi didn't say it doesn't mean she doesn't have that same view.

  10. 23 hours ago, wmw999 said:

     

    Kids enriching themselves? Really? What about Ivanka and Jared? It's not like they were qualified for anything they were doing.

    Wendy P.

    A hell of a lot more than Hunter in the Gas business.  That is by his own admission.

    As far as bold faced lies . . .

    Biden claimed in the debate that he has never said he is against fracking.

    Adamantly defended that he never said anything about eliminating fracking.

    Did he just not remember?  Was he flat out lying? 

  11. · Edited by turtlespeed

    On 10/22/2020 at 10:49 PM, billvon said:

    So no, I don't buy that premise.  It's not a case of "well, they didn't think about that, and so of course they did what the other side did."  They DID think about that, and made a promise to not be hypocrites.  And then, of course, they went back on their promise.

    So, are you upset that they did it first?

    Rather - will do it first?

    I am sure you would find some way to justify it if the tables were turned.

  12. On 10/22/2020 at 11:06 PM, kallend said:

    It truly amazes me that the Trumpists choose to throw stones from their glass house. 

    When it comes to lies, no-one comes close to Trump.

    When it comes to moral turpitude, no-one comes close to Trump.

    When it comes to your kids using your position to enrich themselves, no-one comes close to Trump.

    When it comes to enriching yourself at taxpayer expense, no-one comes close to Trump.

     

    etc.

    That's amazing you can say that. presumably with a straight face too.

  15. 23 hours ago, billvon said:

    That's a lie of course.  I know that doesn't matter to you.

    He is on Biden's side.

    Ask him - he will tell you who he supports.

    Biden has proven to me that he is a liar.

    Take for instance the one where he said that he never discussed Hunter's business dealing.

  16. On 10/21/2020 at 9:05 PM, wmw999 said:

    So it's not a power grabbing charade because it's an actual power grab, is that your contention?

    Wendy P.

    I'm saying that it is only a power grab depending on where you politically align.

    If the roles and situations were reversed, the same people screaming about it being a power grab now, would not be the ones saying it IS a power grab. They would be saying that it is needed to be filled immediately.

  18. 4 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

    And then there is the Chinese bank account and the Chinese payments and the Chinese trademarks for the family.

    And the intelligence staff who claim it is Russian disinformation. Trump's staff have shown that they cannot be trusted or believed.

    So has Biden, but you are on his side.

  19. · Edited by turtlespeed

    On 10/20/2020 at 12:17 PM, phantomII said:

    Like in 2016.
    Now, explain again, why it is not a powergrabbing charade by the Republicans.

    That's simple.

    Its not a power grabbing charade now because the liberals aren't the ones in power.

    If the liberals were in power, and it was their appointee, most here wouldn't see issue with it.

    Then - it would be a power grab.

    • Like 1

  20. On 10/19/2020 at 2:08 PM, JoeWeber said:

    Outstanding. Well done!

    Sorry, but just to be hyper critical, that wasn't 5 - 7 - 5.

  21. On 10/19/2020 at 1:58 PM, wolfriverjoe said:

    Well, the background on this story is getting sillier & sillier.

     

    So Giuliani has been hanging around with a Russian agent. He & Steve Bannon are the 'sources'.
    Nobody but a tabloid would take the story.
    The lead author refused to put his name on the story, and one of the purported 'authors' didn't even know about it until after it was published.

    Link to HCR's page (if you read this after today, you may have to scroll down to read this - It's the one from Oct 18th):

    https://www.facebook.com/heathercoxrichardson/

    https://nypost.com/2020/10/20/doj-agrees-hunter-biden-emails-are-not-russian-disinformation-report/

    Not a russian disinformation thing - says Ratcliff.