Speed-Flyer

You need some sanity... How is that war on terror working for ya? I suppose those that warned that this predicament would happen a decade ago are insane too. LOL Trillions of dollars, fuck knows how many lives and over a decade with a coalition consisting of the strongest most funded military force in the world and terror prevails... The war on terror2 (too) is about the start and the last one is still in full swing. Talk about full retard, and you have the audacity to call those that question the motive insane... Pure hypocrisy.

But I like puppy dogs and apple pie...

OK you are right. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

exhibit a... But to answer the question;

who was it? That is not protocol.

I am pretty sure that most of the time people use the term conspiracy theory, they firstly use it as an implication that the said theory is wrong and secondly to discredit the person responsible for discussing the subject. I guess the term has a new meaning now... something long the lines of You are wrong, do not talk about this subject any longer or you will be ridiculed... It also is an invitation for others of the same ilk to come together and pressure this person into thinking otherwise. I am certainly hearing you on shady 'goings on' within the government, the excuse that something could not happen because we would know about it otherwise is a pretty weak one. Take even the concept of lobbyists for example, this is a legal way of buying our government. Who gives a shit about that, why do we vote? Why do we have government? What is the point when multi-billion dollar companies can buy our politicians, these politicians can blatantly lie and get away with it and the media owned by these multi-billion dollar corporations will swing the story in their favor anyway. And Joe Bloggs just listens to it thinking they live in a free society. People do not seem interested in the truth, they know the truth is too difficult to address and would rather live in an uninformed and comfortable existence. Hence the term conspiracy theory being used when one might have to question their view on something. Ignorance is bliss.

The fact that this term is used to describe people that question dogma (implying they are wrong) and not those that believe more than one person conspired to commit a crime in itself is telling. This term has been coined specifically for the purposes of alienating anyone that dares question authority. In a literal sense, everyone is a conspiracy theorist. Unless they believe that every crime ever committed was done singlehandedly.

Well the point was, that the joint chiefs of staff presented that to the president which in turn shows that the country was being run by psychopaths at that time. It did not happen because the president vetoed it. If the President did not then they may well have implemented this course of action. Do you really think they would not have considered the scope of the project and how they might implement not only the action but control the reaction, before presenting it to the president? Take operation mockingbird for example, systems were in place for cover ups since world war 2 ended and probably much earlier. I am not concluding anything about any particular incident, just pointing out that there are (or at least have been) psychopaths at the helm and that people should not dismiss anything based on rational thought. There is nothing rational about a psychopath whether they are in a dessert on the other side of the planet or working in the government.

Operation Northwoods... Who leaked that? Only when it was declassified did it become public. Plenty of people knew about it. I do not know much about TWA 800, but there are plenty of cases where the government covers shit up. There is a lot that can be said for compartmentalization. Really the most crazy people are those that believe the words of politicians and the media. Although many are often wrong, those that question everything are less crazy than those that simply 'fall for it'.

This fellow makes some reasonably compelling points about the burning video suggestng it is faked that makes sense. I have not decided yet if it is definitive but I did not watch the video until after reading this article. I did not want to watch someone burning alive. However after watching the video I am not entirely sure this man is in fact burning alive. The flames do 'look' fake and he does not seem to be reacting like a person that is being burned to death, but hey. I have not experienced anyone burning to death and I am not a video CGI expert. http://www.thomaswictor.com/the-jordanian-pilot-was-not-burned-alive/ The most peculiar still image (capture) to me, is the one showing him supposedly engulfed in flames, while his shirt that was apparently doused in accelerant and his hair are not so much as singed. Something to ponder anyway. We know King Abdullah II has been funding and training ISIS indirectly by arming and training Syrian opposition rebels that have sworn to be ISIS allies... So something about all of this did have me scratching my head. This article then pops up so I guess it is plausible.

Are they filtering your internet or what? There is plenty of info on this. A chemical factory was hit by the Kiev forces. They have claimed that 200 rebels were killed.

It is quite strange that one would concoct such easily debunked evidence in such a forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92sOLL_I5nc He claims that he is in possession of several passports belonging to Russian soldiers and officers, that they obtained in Ukraine during the conflict. There is one quite substantial problem with his accusations; Russian military personnel relinquish their passports upon entering the military in exchange for a military ID. Russia immediately demanded copies of these passports, Ukraine refused to comply. It takes either a very brave man or a very stupid man to make such a lie in front of such a forum. It seems the later is the most likely. To top it off, he stated that it was not only evidence of Russian military presence in the region, but the very best evidence they could provide. lol Kerry seems adamant that the EU is on the same page as the US, McCain wants to send as many of his buddies wares in as possible. It looks increasingly like the European nations are shying away from escalating the conflict militarily. Though the open discussion in US presence does 'seem' like they are on the same page, the meetings that have been happening over the past couple of days and statements coming from them seem to indicate otherwise. The next couple of months in Ukraine will be interesting to say the least.

Nope, ignoring the FACTS that he is arming and training them openly under the premise of aiding a rebellion against Assad is simply Batshit crazy. You have the facts, you have the statements you have all the evidence but instead you choose to ignore these things...

Not only sympathiser, he arms them, trains them and uses them for his (meaning his masters) geopolitical objectives. Al Nusra is ISIS, US weapons are sent to Al Nusra, openly. This is not a secret, everyone is angry about ISIS but nobody is talking about the arms ammunition and training being supplied by not only the US but other countries INCLUDING JORDAN! It is sad that the world has gone full retard and are no longer capable of reading between the lines. Operation mockingbird was a good investment indeed (for them) it is clear.

They didn't use this, did they? Unimpressed You do know what it is and how the Nazi's used it, right? Pirate Funny you say that. I'll give you one guess which president/s father/grandfather owned the company that made and sold that gas to the Germans during WW2? But I digress. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar