Leaderboard
-
in all areas
- All areas
- Adverts
- Advert Questions
- Advert Reviews
- Videos
- Video Comments
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- Images
- Image Comments
- Image Reviews
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Album Reviews
- Files
- File Comments
- File Reviews
- Dropzones
- Dropzone Comments
- Dropzone Reviews
- Gear
- Gear Comments
- Gear Reviews
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Article Reviews
- Fatalities
- Fatality Comments
- Fatality Reviews
- Stolen items
- Stolen item Comments
- Stolen item Reviews
- Records
- Record Comments
- Record Reviews
- Help Files
- Help File Comments
- Help File Reviews
- Events
- Event Comments
- Event Reviews
- Posts
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Custom Date
-
All time
January 20 2016 - April 25 2024
-
Year
April 25 2023 - April 25 2024
-
Month
March 25 2024 - April 25 2024
-
Week
April 18 2024 - April 25 2024
-
Today
April 25 2024
-
Custom Date
03/10/2023 - 03/10/2023
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/10/2023 in all areas
-
7 pointsI also blame Newt for the first blatant telling of lies and starting the trend that it was somehow 'OK'. When confronted by a reporter during an interview with something that he said - it was patently false and the reporter outed him on it. Newt said something to the effect of "This is what our people believe." I was disturbed as was the reporter at the time. Honesty used to be a thing. Now we just openly lie and then double down on it when confronted.
-
3 pointsThis has been touched on before.. it is very interesting but frustrating because the redactions mean we can't follow up on it... It may be a hoax or unrelated,,, Washougal was the base for many logging companies.. "operating out of the Washougal, Washington area." but it isn't clear where the money was actually found. Quantity of old $20's.. It was just prior to the TBAR discovery.. The date of this report is the end of April.. (Spring/Summer diatoms timing) Follow up,, negative..
-
2 pointsThe most comprehensive study I've seen on eyewitness accuracy was a study done by Dutch academics. They found that 44% of eyewitnesses were able to get within an inch. So if 44% of witnesses chose 6'1 for a height, then the actual perp was between 6'0 and 6'2. 34% of people were given a "partly correct" assessment, which means they got within two inches, so if they chose 6'1 then the person was actually 5'11 or 6'3. And as you can see 22% fell outside that range on their estimations. As far as eyewitnesses overestimating the height of criminals during a crime (when they are aware of the crime), that's pretty much settled science at this point.
-
2 points
-
1 pointI know I’m like a broken record but somehow for some reason he needs to get nailed, and soon.
-
1 pointIn other news a judge has ruled that Trump's grab 'em by the pussy Access Hollywood tape can be shown to the jury in the Carroll case. Ruh-roh.
-
1 pointHis portrayal of "strength" was totally undermined by his groveling to Putin at the meeting in Helsinki.
-
1 pointThat was the thing Trump understood like no-one else. Admit nothing, apologise for nothing, double down on even the craziest falsehoods and people will see it as 'strength'
-
1 pointThe FBI had a reputation for not recording interviews so they could let's say engineer 302's to fit their purpose,, several court cases later many States require the FBI to record interviews.. Lack of recording interviews was a feature not a bug..
-
1 pointNegative. The needn't accept the subject. Anytime you seek to learn a thing, that the thing is a subject is manifest. No, for your purposes they must first accept the proposition as true. All you want to do is finish the job. Try as we all do, you will never see the fallacy of your method. No matter, I forgive you for you know not what you do.
-
1 pointSo his believers are . . . trans people, immigrants, Ukranians, Capitol police and black men?
-
Newsletter