Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/04/2022 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    I'm so sorry to hear that you broke your Googling finger. You sure as shit seem comfortable posting/sharing second-hand info when it aligns with the points that you're trying to make. Hell, it seems one of your favourite pastimes is sharing your interpretation of what "Woke" say, but it's too much to find direct quotes of Rogan??? Or did you just read them and agree with them? Maybe, just maybe, Neil Young and Joni Mitchell didn't want to hold a news conference and shout the same bullshit they're protesting into a microphone. Are they supposed to hold a news conference or "Shut up and player guitar"? As always, you're all over the map with a lengthy post of blithering bullshit peppered with some $3 words to attempt to sound intelligent.
  2. 3 points
    That's as meaningful as asking what the D stands for in DPRK. At this point I could also throw in the U in USA.
  3. 2 points
    Facts are inconvenient for Fox.
  4. 2 points
    They can't see the parallels, because they don't read books.
  5. 1 point
    nope. that was not paper or cardboard, unless it makes a clacking sound when it drops, and doesn't flutter or hesitate at all. video a drop of that tag and show what it looks and sounds like. that tag in the picture is most certainly cardboard based on the visible corner dogear.
  6. 1 point
    In the same sense that I am puzzled about the specifics when the last president blathered on about "Fake News!," I am unsure of quite what got Neil et al. worked up about "disinformation." Precisely what do you claim was wrong, and what do you claim is right? On what basis? What are your data? If someone puts forth a thesis with data that support a more effective model of virus propagation, suppression or whatever, I'm interested. If they simply say "you're wrong, that has been discredited!" without anything to back it up, it kind of rings hollow. Saying that disagreeing with one stance or another will be met with severe consequences constitutes Argumentum ad Baculum, or appeal to force, which neither supports nor refutes one stance or another. It's on a par with "confess or we put out your eyes!" Joe Rogan may or may not be spreading disinformation. I really don't know, since everything I know about him I got secondhand. I would be much more impressed if Neil and Joni were to hold a news conference where they used rock solid data to refute whatever it was with which they disagreed, irrefutably line and verse. Saying "if you disagree with me, I'm taking my bat and ball and going home" makes one suspect they don't personally have a clue either way. As Frank Zappa put it, "Shut up and player guitar." BSBD, Winsor
  7. 1 point
    When I first started participating in the Cooper forums, it was evident that everyone else was already well familiar with each other. It was also clear that nobody had any regard for RMB. But I like to keep an open mind, give people the benefit of the doubt, and make my own assessments. And I believe I have been fair with him. But geez... Rarely have I ever seen someone more clueless, more un-self-aware, be so full of themselves. Deluded to the point of mental infirmity. And now he is intentionally, purposefully spamming the site and daring for it to be shut down. An infantile tantrum if ever I saw one. This should definitely be reported in an effort to get him banned and the site restored to on-topic posts. And Robert, as I told you before (but nothing gets through your thick skull into your deluded brain), what goes on in the other sites regarding you is not hatred. People would have to care about you in order to hate you. It is well-deserved mockery.
  8. 1 point
    I figure if we stop posting the eyeballs will stop coming making it less desirable for Robert to want to spam here. Maybe Robert will get sick of talking to himself one day like when Forrest Gump randomly stopped running in the movie but I doubt it seriously. Lol at any rate it’s worth the old college try! #operationtakebackthedz
  9. 1 point
    Flyjack and others we are In the process of creating a more technically advanced version of Sluggos website called WiKCoopedia. This whole thread will be archived on it as well as a brand new discussion forum for DBC. I will post a link when the sites live. In the meantime I’m calling for a boycott… nobody post in this thread as long as Robert continues to use this as his personal blog space!
  10. 1 point
    Newt Gingrich is now suggesting January 6th Committee members may be jailed should Republicans win the mid-terms. Just let that sink in for a minute....
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up