Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/25/2019 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    So funny clicking this link all these years later to see that Squirrel completely and utterly dominate the PPC charts... Hahahaha
  2. 1 point
    Not wearing earplugs on every skydive? Hear me out (while you still can): It’s pretty damn important to add a pair to your every-jump kit, and your excuses probably don’t hold up to expert scrutiny. What expert? A lofty one. Last week, I got to talk to Dr. Anna Hicks* at length about the thorny matter of skydiving with a cold (watch the February issue of Parachutist for that one). At one point, our conversation took a slight diversion towards hearing damage. The content of that more than deserves its own moment in the sun: Our delicate soundholes, and the damage we don’t have to do them. So: Why aren’t you wearing earplugs on every jump? 1. Because it’s not that big a deal. If you like listening to things other than phantom roaring, then sorry. It kinda is. Each of us is born with 15,000 sound-sensing cells per ear. (I like to think of ‘em as magical hearing hair, because that’s kinda what they look like.) Hearing loss occurs when they die. It’s not just noise exposure that kills them; certain medications and other environmental factors and do it, too, but those are freak deaths by comparison. Once they’re gone, they’re gone. Birds, fish, and amphibians have the ability to grow back magical hearing hair. Mammals, like your average skydiver, lack the ability to regenerate these cells. All we can do is stick in a hearing aid and hope for the best. You don’t have to take my word for it. Talk to anybody who suffers from tinnitus and ask them if they’d have taken precautions to prevent it. 2. Because I don’t jump that much. Dr. Hicks begs to differ. “I see so many skydivers that have damaged their hearing,” she notes. “Even if you’re just doing 100 jumps a year, every time you jump, the engine is noisy, and the freefall is noisy, too. Over your skydiving career, that adds up to a lot of noise exposure.” “I still find some people that can’t be bothered with ear plugs even in the wind tunnel,” she adds, “but our hearing is too important not to take ten seconds to put them in every time. You don’t want to end up not able to hear your friend at the pub because you knackered your hearing from too much noise exposure.”** 3. Wearing earplugs in freefall is dangerous. If it’s not just laziness that’s keeping you from protecting your hearing, it might be a misplaced sense of safety. Dr. Hicks wears hers from ground to ground, and she recommends that you do too, even if it’s just on the way up to altitude. “I am a big advocate with any patient I see,” she says, “especially those whose job is skydiving, to wear ear plugs at least on the way up and ideally on the way down as well. Earplugs do not prevent situational awareness, stop you from being able to talk to your students, or to hear shouts under canopy. You can hear what you need to hear, usually you can actually hear your audible altimeter better because the background freefall crackle is reduced, and vitally, [wearing earplugs] reduces the longer-term damage we can experience from our sport.” Some people discover that they find a problem equalizing if they have earplugs in on the way down. Dr. Hicks’ advice: If equalizing is a problem for you, try using the vented plugs (which you can buy from a pharmacy for a few dollars) to better equalize during descent. 4. I can’t afford the nice ones and the foam ones cause ear infections. According to Dr. Hicks, that is not a thing. As long as the plugs are rated, they’ll provide the protection you need. “You can wear posh ear plugs or the cheap foam ones like you get in the tunnel,” she says. “Either-or.” According to a study of sixty long-range patrol-aircraft crew members, the idea that disposable foam earplugs cause ear infections is a total myth. The crew members were randomly divided into three groups: one wearing fancy custom-molded earplugs, the second using foam earplugs that they washed after each use, and the third group using foam earplugs washed only once per week. The study lasted eight weeks and included examinations by a medical officer as well as skin scrapings for bacterial culture and fungal examinations. The results indicated no fungal infections or clinically significant bacterial infections, and no differences in positive bacterial culture between the groups. Moral of the story: roll ‘em up and stick ‘em in. They’re going to prevent a heck of a lot more damage than they could possibly cause, and 50-year-old you (who doesn’t have to have the TV on FULL BLAST ALL THE TIME) will thank you. *Dr. Hicks is a certified badass. An active-duty Aviation Medicine specialist in the British Regular Army, she has logged more than 4,000 jumps over 15 years in the sport, many of which as the Outside Center for the multi-medaled British 4-way team NFTO. Dr. Hicks is also a British Parachute Association Accelerated Freefall Instructor and formation skydiving coach, as well as a Skydiving Instructor at Britain’s legendary Skydive Netheravon. Oh: and she was Tom Cruise’s personal aviation doc during the filming of the latest Mission: Impossible reboot. ‘Nuff said. **Confused? Ask a British person for a translation.
  3. 1 point
    Mike Mullins recently made this statement in the Incidents forum: ======================= Any person who is a USPA member must follow the BSRs at a Group Member DZ, at a non-Group Member DZ, in a farmers field, in someones back yard, does not matter where you are jumping. If you are a USPA member you are required to follow the BSR, period. As USPA members were involved in this jump they were definitely required to follow the BSRs. Someone who is not a USPA member, jumping at a non-Group Member DZ, needs only to comply with the FARs. ======================= This is the first I have heard of this. I've jumped in a lot of places throughout the world, and while I use the BSR's as the default, there are cases where they don't seem applicable. One example is while I worked for a military freefall training program; the course instructor was not a USPA rated instructor (although he was certainly rated as such by the military.) Another example were water and demo jumps made in another country - they were made without "the advice of the appropriate USPA S&TA, Instructor Examiner, or Regional Director" (but again, with much advice from the local equivalent.) I've intentionally jumped through clouds while at a foreign DZ after the chief instructor briefed us on how to do it, and told us it was both legal and customary there. Are all those things really considered no different than doing them at a USPA DZ?
  4. 1 point
    Awesome! thanks for the update Wendy P.
  5. 1 point
    #1 This was a problem, but has been taken care of by a BSR change (from about a year ago I think). It added the verbiage "or those training personnel under military orders" SIM section 2-1: BASIC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, A. APPLICABILITY #2 Advice for water and demo jumps is not BSR related in another country. #3 It is a BSR violation to violate an FAR, but in another country the FARs don't apply. Unfortunately, this stuff is often not easy to understand. Mike and I have often called each other to discuss what some things mean and how to interpret and explain them.
  6. 1 point
    All we have is a summary written by one of Trumps swamp critters. And this was released just 48hrs after Mueller submitted it. Mueller had: 19 lawyers ~40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants 2,800+ subpoenas Nearly 500 search warrants 230+ orders for communications records Nearly 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence Interviewed ~500 witnesses I don't know how many pages were in the report, but I seriously doubt anyone could read the whole thing *and* write a summary in 48hrs. (And why the hell does everything I type get double-spaced, goddamit!!!)
  7. 1 point
    I define "social media" more broadly that most. I consider dropzone.com social media, as well as any other hobby based forum, or reddit, or any site where you join an online community and can post and interact with others, so while you can stay off all such sites, most choose to have some sort of online social media presence (as I define it). I find it puzzling that for sites where the user individually curates a list of content creators (where they are by friending, or following), users complain about the content they see. If you have problems with content, drop the individual source of the content, not the entire site. Social media sites offer a wide range of people / groups to interact with, and it is up to the user to shape their experience in a way that meets their needs. What are my needs? I want to be entertained. I want to laugh, I want to smile, I want to learn new things, I want to help other people laugh and learn as well.
  8. 1 point
    People in favor of the electoral college keep saying this but haven't really looked at the mathematics of it. It's simply not true. CGP Grey edumacates folk. Skip to 3:17 for an idiots guide as to why, but the cliffs notes version is that if you won the 100 biggest cities in the US because you focused your time there you'd win less than 20% of the popular vote. In fact, not only is it not true, but it's exactly backwards. The system we have encourages candidates to actively ignore large population centers and it behooves them to spend the MOST time where lots of electoral college votes are held by relatively small populations. Same link - skip to 4:16 to see how you can win the election by focusing on the SMALLEST populations and have less than 22% of the popular vote but still win the electoral college. So not only do you have the same situation you're apparently concerned about - a politician 'ignoring' a population or area because of the effect it has on their chances to win, but rather now it's ignoring the areas where MOST Americans live. To decide the American president... That's just fucking nuts.
  9. 1 point
    Yeah. They could teach social media posting like they used to teach letter writing. The first rule is "be interesting". To me, this means 1. Post a variety of stuff. Same topic repetitive posts quickly become boring. One or two vacation pics is great. A dozen sucks. 2. Be real. No one likes a tragedy, but people like drama, so sure, post something that highlights the trouble in your life, but don't poor me yourself. 3. Be funny. Easier said than done. But you can get away with a lot if you are funny, not even lol funny, just smh funny is ok.
  10. 1 point
    Before going into my review of the helmet, I'd like to give you all peeps some of my experience. I've been on a stomach flying team as a camera flyer and an inside flyer on a 4 way VFS team. I have done AFF alone(scary) and with another instructor I have stomach flown while video taping tandems I have been on tracking dives I have been on angle dives (formerly known as automonauti when they were lame and only done by bad flying Europeans) I have been on hybrids as the hanger, sometime soon I'll get the opportunity to fly on my stomach in one I have been on lots of vertical world records, including the biggest round ever last may in Spaceland. I usually wear an open face because i'm a man. I've never worn the KIss. Feel free to contact me about my accomplishments, I love talking about myself. Oh, almost forgot, I've been under canopy when the space Shuttle lifted off and I saw it with my bare eyes because of my awesome open face. When I'm not skydiving I like to internet skydive on this awesome website full of nothing but facts.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up