All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. tkhayes
    well that only took 4 years..... it would appear that the entire justice system is designed to be an enabler for crimes.....
  3. Today
  4. jakee
    IIRC Eastman has argued that because he committed the same crime in a bunch of different states, only one of the cases should be allowed to go forward or it would be Double Jeopardy. The judge simply told him no, you don’t get rewarded for being a more ambitious criminal.
  5. JeffBarlow
    Experiencing another issue, now with posting new ads. Can't upload a Jpeg image, even print screen here. And error message i'm getting is below. Any thoughts....???? .................................no decode delegate for this image format `JPEG' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/575 Please contact us for assistance.................................................
  6. kallend
    Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, John Eastman and Christina Bobb, top campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn, former campaign aide Mike Roman, former state party chair Kelli Ward, state Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, and Tyler Bowyer, a GOP national committeeman and chief operating officer of Turning Point Action, the campaign arm of the pro-Trump conservative group Turning Point USA. Trump was not charged, but he is described in the indictment as an unindicted co-conspirator. His campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
  7. gowlerk
    Well then, I'm no longer concerned that you may have meant nibbling. Which would have puzzled me greatly.
  8. Yesterday
  9. wolfriverjoe
    Interesting. I learned something today. Nibling: Gender neutral term for a child of a sibling (traditionally niece or nephew).
  10. ryoder
    Some more fake electors just Found Out: NBC News: Trump’s 2020 'fake electors' charged with state crimes in Arizona The indictments follow an investigation led by Arizona ETA: WaPo reporting Meadows & Giuliani also indicted.
  11. wmw999
    I first heard that Dorothy Parker coined it. But maybe not; the internet seems to disagree Wendy P.
  12. weldingninja41
    Hi Roy, do you know what size canopies were being used with these bags? Do you have a line on the containers that they came out of?
  13. ryoder
    No, she meant nibling. It threw me as well, the first time she used the word, until I looked it.
  14. JoeWeber
    They just can not avoid thinking about it because their interest isn't moral it's prurient. Often it's as simple as anger over others doing openly what they either secretly desire or merely have very natural curiosities or occasional wonderings. Like reformed smokers they incessantly proselytize against the behaviors as a way to keep the ideas, and pictures, fresh in mind. By claiming their interest is faith based they can avoid uncomfortable questions about their strange concerns. Of course, if the urges become uncontrollable there are always a spare set or two of vestments to don for additional camouflage.
  15. gowlerk
    I may be slightly offended unless it turns out that you meant to type "sibling".
  16. wmw999
    And that’s why it all comes down to respect for me. Because by considering how to treat someone with respect, generally I don’t offend. That means my violently evangelical sister in law doesn’t hear about my transgender nibling. And, while “not offending” isn’t a primary objective all the time, I find people listen much better when treated with respect. And I find it easier to do so if I automatically find something to respect in them yeah, sometimes that’s not easy Wendy P.
  17. kallend
    There are certainly activities that I find "off-putting". I'm sure everyone has one or more things like that. To the greatest extent possible I avoid thinking about things I don't like, and just let others get on with their own lives. Some people, however, seem to obsess about what other people do in private, and get all bent out of shape about it. These busibodies need to learn to mind their own business.
  18. BIGUN
    Congrats, you're trending. :)
  19. BIGUN
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/p8TArslrp3c
  20. BIGUN
    I've been trying hard for a couple of days and could not sell any of my cast iron. Guess that's not for me either. Wait . . . you said OnlyFans. Damn, I was trying OnlyPans.
  21. gowlerk
    Sexual immorality is what other people do that I not only would not do, but also find off putting. Or, it is what I say I would not do but have actually done or want to do and I feel guilty about desiring it.
  22. JoeWeber
    As are the belief systems that are the root cause.
  23. billvon
    And it changes rapidly. 200 years ago, interracial marriages were immoral. It was immoral for women to have sex before marriage, but not men, since men needed sex to remain healthy. Homosexuality was punishable by jail time. Rape of colored women was not. The mutability of morality is further proof that it's just a transient construct that will change again and again.
  24. dmathews1960
    If anyone following this thread knows where I can find a Paradactyl, I would be TRULY appreciative! Been looking for about a year now and still no luck!
  25. bdb2004
    I have a very large head, a pretty large nose, and nowadays I also have a significant amount of big, curly hair. My XXL Cookie G3 just barely fits, and depending on how I tie up my hair my nose is either touching the visor or is 1 to 2 mm away from it. I'd rather have an open face but it's challenging when you wear glasses. But that's a different topic.
  26. gowlerk
    Sexual immorality is just a construct. The only immorality would be if someone is taking advantage of a child or a person otherwise not able to give informed consent. Homosexual sex is not immoral. Men entering the priesthood then using the posistion of trust to take advantage of children is immoral. Likewise it is not immoral for a boy or a girl to feel they don't fit your expectations of their sexuality. It is a struggle, and it may be very difficult for them, but it is not immoral.
  27. dmathews1960
    Hey riggers - especially old guys like me! I have a very nice Delta II Parawing that I want to put into a modern, airworthy, piggyback harness/container system. I'm only guessing that I should look for something that would hold a modern 280 sq ft main. As modern canopies might pack smaller, is this big enough? Since I'll probably be finding one online, I would like to have the container size nailed down before purchasing something. Can anyone confirm that 280 is correct, or what the correct size should be? I'm setting it up with a BOC. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
  28. jakee
    So, being honest, what kind of serious conversation did you want as a result? Not sure what the sayings are in your neck of the woods but kids around here get taught "ask a silly question, get a silly answer" at quite a young age.
  1. Load more activity