0
kallend

Instructors

Recommended Posts

Quote

You dont need someone with the TITLE BMI/PFI/WS-I or whatever....you need someone who is an instructor in his heart (gay as that may sound)

Doing it for the love of flying...doing it for the smiles....and doing it because he or she wants to further the dicipline...a huge force of enthousiasm and drive to fly being what makes him or her want to teach people..



well said Jarno.
B|

Where is my fizzy-lifting drink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's obvious your vendetta is against people (certain instructors you've met, no doubt), and not the concept of instructorship. You can FUCK in bold and capitals those people all you want, but in doing so you are abandoning the actual discussion at hand, which is the value of a competent instructor.



Hey this discussion started by someone else lamenting bad quality so called instructors and the wish for a more uniformed higher quality instructor directed from above. It isn't going to happen. History with bad instructors or the good does not warrant it. Move along citizens.:P

I pointed out the fact that they are not needed based on all of your ( other rated instructor's) own gripes about one another. If there were some higher level rating created who do you think the applicants would be? The same shitty flyers, although lesser in numbers.

I don't have a vandetta you guys are proving your own short comings. You can say that I hate instructors ( not true) all you want. You can also yell that all of you rated motherfuckers are the best and the safest from your self righteous tower and I will just get the opinion of another rated super safe instructor off the roster that says no you are not. I can get that opinion in writing in this same tread.

A few years ago a heated discussion about instruction would have been based on those with ratings and their names on a factory roster against those without formal verification of skills and ability.
now you guys are turning on each other and you are all on the roster, you all have ratings. Funny!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You dont need someone with the TITLE BMI/PFI/WS-I or whatever....you need someone who is an instructor in his heart (gay as that may sound)

Doing it for the love of flying...doing it for the smiles....and doing it because he or she wants to further the dicipline...a huge force of enthousiasm and drive to fly being what makes him or her want to teach people..



well said Jarno.
B|


Yes agreed, Jarno very well said.

Although you can say it because you have the rating not despite it. When a bunch of guys without ratings said the same thing a few years back they were laughably threatened, told they were reckless and unsafe, banned from the forums. etc.

I predict that in 5~7 years there won't be anybody willing to claim to be an instructor. Wingsuits will still be around and there will be guys who do it and guys who do it really well. Those who do it really well will have the bulk of our attention and adoration and manufacturer support. We can only hope that we can find them at the center of some cool events open to the rest of us who do it good enough and just want to get a little better with our friends.

Instructor patches might just end up being a curious relic from the past or a humorous item of scorn to be tossed into the bonfire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yes agreed, Jarno very well said.

Although you can say it because you have the rating not despite it.



Yes..and its because I still believe we should strive for the instructors patch meaning something...which is the reason I choose to have and get one in the first place...

Because, for me, it stands for something...

Its too bad it may not stand for the same thing with everyone...and thats what you are rebelling against..over and over again...

But trying to get good educated and capable people out there teaching and instructing has always been the goal...and for people who dont know anything...it could and should be mean the same thing, as it means when you have an instructor with an AFF rating teach you skydiving.

The fact that not everyone may actually have 'earned' that title/patch or whatever is clear...you've mentioned it a bazillion times...and you'd probably see me get a tatoo with kermit on my arm sooner then you'd ever become any form of instructor...WE KNOW! But dont bash every person who chooses to get a rating, because it actually means something to him or her...

Moneysceme? Pyramid thing? I dont know who you've met, and what wrong example those people set for you..but the people I've witnessed getting their training didnt get ripped off, and got 2 full days of training and their moneys worth of jumps, and are now walking around as instructors fully deserved...and when somebody goes up to them for instruction..they can fully trust that person to be capable of doing everything that I title claims he can and cant do for a student wanting to get into wingsuits..

There are people out there who got their 'rating' the cheep/easy way, and may not deserve it anymore...and there's nothing we can do about that..

But your pointless, and over and over bashing of people who choose to get a rating, with the sole reason of wanting to actually have it mean something...its silly...and I honestly dont get it...

you dont want to be an BMI/PFI etc....because you have your own 'vectorboy' rating, and thats what you stand for when you coach, teach and instruct someone...

But some people believe that official instructorspatch should uphold and represent that same 'quality', who are you to call them idiots?

Its kinda like the whole BASEnumbers thing.

Go to france, and most BASEjumpers there dont have a BASEnumber...because they dont care...but you wont see them slag someone who does have one...

As most people who have a BASEnumber have it because they think it stands for something....but like the BMI/PFI thing...some people just have it to show off (with a big copyrighted tatoo on their shouldeblades)....

Even though they are not the best basejumpers ever...and maybe even hardly jump..as for them...the number or title is all they throw around..

There's different reasons to get a title or number...be it base..be it wingsuit instructor...

dont redicule people who have one for the right reason just because you think its stupid...not everyone has the same beliefs as to what it stands for (or should stand for)
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are miss reading me.

I don't have a vector rating. I don't have a first flight worthy trainer suit any more. I haven't conducted a first flight course in years. I would if needed without hesitation. I have recommended mentors who will do a fantastic FFC. Some are rated I's some just fly really well. I don't bash anybody who has a rating. I play nice with all of them, except the frauds. I'm not picking on anyone who contributes. Not you not Matt. Not even the score of new I's you are having a problem with, Jarno

I'm not rebelling against a factory instructor program as none are recognized or required by my governing body therefore don't really need to exist or more importantly rebelled against by me. Let this last sentence really soak in.

I love to poke the stick at it when it gets all serious and self righteous but its completely legal to just ignore it here, most people do.

You guys are basically unhappy with yourselves. The reality is that the governing body will not step in and most of us don't want them to. You are unhappy with your own factory level instructor programs, the very ones you've signed up with. Question is what are you going to do about bad rated instructors? Its up to you guys to fix yourselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The reality is that the governing body will not step in and most of us don't want them to.



As we've seen in some countries (I believe Italy a while ago?)...it only takes one bad incident to HAVE the governing body step in and suddenly put severe (dare I say unrealistic/dangerous) limits on who can and cant teach...

Some people try to work towards something better....some just stand along the sideline and comment...

And knowing you a bit better, I believe you are definately part those trying to further the dicipline the right way....but tend to like come across a bit of an ignorant rebel here, critisizing (tongue in cheek or not) everyone who does not share you vision of how it should be...


commercialising the whole teaching/coaching is not my intention...and I guess thats mostly what puts you off of the whole 'official' instructors thing...or did some instructor do bad things to you in the basement or touch you in the private place...its ok to be scaredB|;)
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You guys are basically unhappy with yourselves. The reality is that the governing body will not step in and most of us don't want them to. You are unhappy with your own factory level instructor programs, the very ones you've signed up with. Question is what are you going to do about bad rated instructors? Its up to you guys to fix yourselves.





What ? I think Matt an mccordia just finished saying they have ther Ratings because it means something to them so how are they feeling sorry for them selves. How did you start your skydiving carreer ??? Did you pay for coach jumps to get you a b c and so on. Isnt this the same thing... Do you have ne ratings your self because we all had to pay our dues and now why not take the oppritunity to be on the other side and make some money. Its one big circle. Wingsuit Instructers are in the ealry stage and eventually it will be a uspa and Cspa regualtion. Every part of this sport started and ended up this way no ????? I know im new I not trying to be a 100 jump wonder just sharing my views ......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And knowing you a bit better, I believe you are definately part those trying to further the dicipline the right way. critisizing (tongue in cheek or not) everyone who does not share you vision of how it should be...

and I guess thats mostly what puts you off of the whole 'official' instructors thing...or did some instructor do bad things to you in the basement or touch you in the private place...its ok to be scaredB|;)



Don't be fooled I'm not doing anything to promote the discipline now and not pretending to. There are guys that do way more work in that regard. My hat is off to them.

We did in the past do FFC and loan spare suits all for free. Then we realized that such a life was for suckers and now we just fly. In the past we got bashed by the factory hags that didn't think we should be doing it without a rating. The ones that didn't pay for their own suits. We payed for ours and all of our demo suits too. The consumer paid for the hags free suit. We got shit on by the factory reps for mentoring without paying for a rating while supporting the manufacturer with the purchase of more suits. The reps didn't pay for anything, few of the reps lifted a finger for the sport. I don't support that manufacturer anymore. Now we don't care who is an instructor or not.

My predictions, or visions as you say, of how it will be are personal, not for sale, and I don't give a fuck who aggrees or doesn't, I could be very wrong with my predictions BTW. As it goes no intervention is currently needed. More accidents and injuries and you have it your way. Will you have a celebration if the governing bodies come breathing down your leg wing? Sounds like that is what you want.

I don't care about the instructor effect. In the past we were put off by some of the dialogs that went on because we were not rated and the way we were treated. It was funny then and now every once in a while. But nobody is picking on the unrated mentors anymore. You guys are now picking on yourselves. You say the factory level system is flawed and needs revamping, I was told it was perfectly safe and that we were not over and over and over again. It better be safe now there are rated instructors enough for everybody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan>What ? I think Matt an mccordia just finished saying they have ther Ratings because it means something to them so how are they feeling sorry for them selves
Quote


Jarno wrote this:
"At the moment, there isnt a boogie you can go to, without 75% of all attendees having some form of a wingsuit rating. Yet when you see most people fly, they cant even get a normal 2 way to fly together."

"But there's also a large bunch of people out there who didnt really earn that rating. And Im not even talking about an exam. Im just talking about having the skills as an instructor, which the rating they 'flash' indicates they have..."

Honestly he probably only let this little bit of negativity slip as a result of coming down off of a high from attending some really great wingsuit boogies this summer. kind of like a post pardom effect.





Ryan>How did you start your skydiving carreer ??? Did you pay for coach jumps to get you a b c and so on. Isnt this the same thing...

Quote



No Ryan its not the same thing as AFF or AFFI or Tandem rating. I only paid for AFF and a coach for my a not my C,D




Ryan> Wingsuit Instructers are in the ealry stage and eventually it will be a uspa and Cspa regualtion. Every part of this sport started and ended up this way no ?????

Quote

No not needed it would have happend already if it was needed. It won't happen in the future if it continues to not be needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Glen --- your just mad 'cuz your old and you saw my sack

I am a wingsuit instructor and I am proud of it - when I go to a boogie with all of my demo suits the chicks dig me and can hardly keep their pants on - thats why I got the rating. Well that and to piss off some big name BMCIs -- and that worked to.

I really don't know if I have ever charged for a FFC or my slot on the jump - and would do the same for anyone if they come to me --- I would like to think I can fly next to anyone but once I went to Moab and flew with Vectorboy and there was no way I could suck that bad and even thought about putting on a freefly suit to fly with him.

I will have to say that I feel getting some sort of instruction from some one who knows will make you jump much safer.


Glenn --- when you start bitchin it brings a tear to my eye.................Oh the good old days!!!!!!!!!

For all of you that don't know Glenn can fly a wingsuit pretty good (he is old and he is not an instructor so he can't be better than me) and I am just busting his balls

But do get one on one instruction from someone even if it means going to a different DZ for a day -- I am not saying you have to pay for it, there are a lot of flyers out there that will teach you for free - it will help and it will make it safer.

VD


The pimp hand is powdered up ... say something stupid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Glenn --- when you start bitchin it brings a tear to my eye.................Oh the good old days!!!!!!!!!




I'm not bitching I'm amused that now that these guys have plenty of rated instructors to go around for everybody, which is what they wanted, they are unhappy with the quality of them. Its just comedy. They won't be happy until the have a rating for wingsuits administered by the european space agency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The reality is that the governing body will not step in and most of us don't want them to.




I agree with everything you said except that.

The reality is, if the USPA thinks they can pull a bunch of money out of the skydiver's pockets for a new rating, they'll be all over it. With all of the "big names" that are pushing for it, it's only a matter of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all of the "big names" that are pushing for it, it's only a matter of time.



There are big names in Wingsuiting? Fuck me!

I know there are fantastic flyers pushing the boundaries of human flight and designers advancing the state wingsuit design. But aren't they too busy with all of that on their plate?

And I thought all of the "ones" pushing for it don't really accomplish anything or make anything? They're not big names they are just little mouths that roar.:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The reality is that the governing body will not step in and most of us don't want them to.




I agree with everything you said except that.

The reality is, if the USPA thinks they can pull a bunch of money out of the skydiver's pockets for a new rating, they'll be all over it. With all of the "big names" that are pushing for it, it's only a matter of time.



If that happens, i then want to see ratings for FF, RW, CReW, skyboarding, etc instructors. makes sense. no reason why WS needs to be the only dicipline with a rating... not like it is harder or more dangerous than Crew or skyboarding.

Where is my fizzy-lifting drink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... not like it is harder or more dangerous than Crew or skyboarding.



Zach the fine body of rated instructors would disagree with you at this point. Instructing in wingsuits is as hard as instructing a would be tandem master.......oh and managing a successful two way between to rated wingsuit instructors..... man thats a bitch of a challenge, apparently.

A USPA level wingsuit instructor rating will happen because Wingsuits are now banned in Italy or something like that and so many new people are getting hurt in wingsuits nowadays. But first our governing body will have to create the HP canopy instructor rating chief instructor and the air traffic landing pattern controller rating. First those tasks that need to be accomplished and then onto our burden since we wingsuiters are 40% of the total of the injurys/deaths in skydiving world wide, despite the fact we make up less than 5% of the total skydivers.


** Disclaimer**
"a lot of the unofficial 'reading material' available online is not always the best advice possible... "
This entire post is a direct testament to the statement above taken from the 14th post in this tread.
Adhering to the information available in the product manual will help the user achieve much better product satisfaction and safer flights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Instructing in wingsuits is as hard as instructing a would be tandem master......



tandem ratings are do not come into play with what i said and they serve a purpose since they are held to be more responsible for a non-skydiver's life.

there are other 'teaching' ratings out there, just use those. For further reading on this subject, search for last yrs post I started about this :P.

Where is my fizzy-lifting drink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So if you are interested in WS would you take the course or read, read, read (as I have) and just go make a first flight yourself?



Positively not. In the beginning of this "modern" wingsuit era, you could not make a wingsuit jump built by BirdMan unless you had 500 jumps....period. It was not until Rantoul 2003 that we lowered that number to 350 for the WFFC and then, the next year, lowered it to 200 jumps (within 18 months) if you were trained by a BMI and flew with them on your first flight. Yes, in the beginning you could send a guy with 1000 jumps a demo suit, the flight manual, and expect him to do OK. No, there was never a time when BirdMan would sell a suit to a guy with 100 jumps and tell them it was OK to go for it. The people on here that would tell you differently are mistaken and just repeating rumors. The great majority of those people also didn't begin flying wingsuits until long after the BMI course was established.

In the beginning there simply were no suits "laying around" and for sale on the general market. The only way to demo one was to show up at an event where Jari and Robi were travelling showing off their creation. If you liked it, they would measure you and then get you a suit built.

Again, for you people who simply don't know any better, structure is always safer than a lack of it. The BMI program was established, however haphazard at first (prior to 2002), to prevent incidents like the fatality in Kansas where a young college student bought a second-hand suit online, lent it to a friend who got zero training, and that kid subsequently went in in a tangle of lines and canopy. Oh yeah, the kid also had just over 100 jumps.

I am simply over Glen's anti-establishment rants. I am not "the establishment". What I am is a life-long instructor with every rating available who just wants to keep people safe by offering them a proven, established way to get into the sport (including wingsuiting). I don't train 20 female Norwegian BASE jumpers with 30 jumps who offer me a blowjob and I don't train people to wingsuit with under 200 jumps.....ever. You fuckers do what you like, but get over your problem with "instructors" and people who actually do enough for the sport to acquire sponsors. You all sound like whiny bitches....seriously.

Chuck Blue
D-12501
AFF/SL/TM-I, PRO, S&TA, BMCI-4
Z-hills

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well-said Chuck.

It is our responsibility to uphold the highest level of safety while introducing our dicipline to people who have never tried it before. A lot of people still have the misconceived view that flying wingsuits is dangerous. By properly training new pilots and educating both wingsuiters & non-wingsuiters we can help lessen this ill view that so many people have about the sport that we enjoy so much.

-Chris-
WSI-6 / PFI-55
The Brothers Gray Wingsuit Academy
http://www.myspace.com/cgwingsuitpilot
http://www.myspace.com/thebrothersgray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am simply over Glen's anti-establishment rants. I am not "the establishment".

You fuckers do what you like, but get over your problem with "instructors" and people who actually do enough for the sport to acquire sponsors. You all sound like whiny bitches....seriously.

Chuck Blue
D-12501
AFF/SL/TM-I, PRO, S&TA, BMCI-4
Z-hills



Actually I'm not making myself clear enough. I have posted before and I'll state again I'm actually more tolerant of the new Rated instructors, say than Jarno in this thread for example, than some other rated instructors that want more from the system that they are a part of. Are you aware that Jarno was the first one to post, in this thread, that things are not as right as they should be in the instructor ranks..... not me? So lets be clear I don't have a problem with instructors, I don't have a use for them but thats not a problem.

I for one am not delusional about there being some magical way to increase the instructors skills out there other than, in time, skills getting increased via experience. I will be the last guy to bash the new guys that try to become instructors and have been supportive of some who have. The whole governing body superseding the manufacturer rating theory will absolutely not make better flyers out of the current crop of instructors in the present time. Time will if they are still around.

I agree with your whiny bitch comment. In no other discipline/ forum do you hear " we need more governance" or "we need the government to step in" like we hear in this forum. Thats gay! I'm ashamed of you guys.

And in no other forum do we hear " I am the foundation of safety in this discipline, I am the cornerstone of performance, I bring the bling to the wing" , Like we do in this forum. Think about that one and get over yourselves!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

Instructing in wingsuits is as hard as instructing a would be tandem master......



tandem ratings are do not come into play with what i said and they serve a purpose since they are held to be more responsible for a non-skydiver's life.

there are other 'teaching' ratings out there, just use those. For further reading on this subject, search for last yrs post I started about this :P.


You do know this entire reply to your post was sarcasm, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Positively not. In the beginning of this "modern" wingsuit era, you could not make a wingsuit jump built by BirdMan unless you had 500 jumps....period. It was not until Rantoul 2003 that we lowered that number to 350 for the WFFC and then, the next year, lowered it to 200 jumps (within 18 months) if you were trained by a BMI and flew with them on your first flight.

Chuck Blue



Bird man's Jari and Kim came out west in the summers of 01 and 02 to promote the product. They held first flight courses, they sold suits. I would venture to say that a goodly sum of the attendees had less than 500 jumps........ more than 200 yes .........but gauranteably less than 500. Manifest was overseeing events in both cases and would not allow jumpers with less than the required jumps attend. So its safe to say 200 was OK with bird-man ( with instruction ) at that time, at least out west.

By 03 you could get an S3 from BM with a little over 200 jumps.

BY 04 Robert left and that was a rebirth of an era.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites