kallend 1,620 #51 July 18, 2010 Score one for old bald guys.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkZero 0 #52 July 20, 2010 QuoteWhat would you recommend using? 110 lbs of thrust with genuine propulsion rocket = 2.4 kg rocket + 800 g frame + 600 g valves and pipes + 500 g 1.5 l bottle + 200 g lipo + 1100 ml H²O² = 18 sec full thrust That thing in a wingsuit BM S3 about 360 HP to handle is the only problem, because it's scary stuff... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrBbT-uMbI8...your mother... www.pralle-zeiten.de Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,620 #53 July 20, 2010 QuoteQuoteWhat would you recommend using? 110 lbs of thrust with genuine propulsion rocket = 2.4 kg rocket + 800 g frame + 600 g valves and pipes + 500 g 1.5 l bottle + 200 g lipo + 1100 ml H²O² = 18 sec full thrust That thing in a wingsuit BM S3 about 360 HP to handle is the only problem, because it's scary stuff... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrBbT-uMbI8 Problem with rockets is that their efficiency is even worse than model turbines, Interesting that he uses H202 (as monopropellant?) rather than nitrous oxide hybrid. H2O2 in suitable concentration for a rocket is nasty stuff, as the Me163 pilots and mechanics discovered in WWII.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkZero 0 #54 July 20, 2010 QuoteProblem with rockets is that their efficiency is even worse than model turbines, Interesting that he uses H202 (as monopropellant?) rather than nitrous oxide hybrid. H2O2 in suitable concentration for a rocket is nasty stuff, as the Me163 pilots and mechanics discovered in WWII. Model turbines doesn't work at high altitudes, even at 5000ft they sometimes won't start properly. The mechanics worldwide discovered nasty stuff with rockets, even 50 years after they collected sience results. Challenger disaster and many more. Btw it's a monopropellant...your mother... www.pralle-zeiten.de Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,620 #55 July 21, 2010 QuoteQuoteProblem with rockets is that their efficiency is even worse than model turbines, Interesting that he uses H202 (as monopropellant?) rather than nitrous oxide hybrid. H2O2 in suitable concentration for a rocket is nasty stuff, as the Me163 pilots and mechanics discovered in WWII. Model turbines doesn't work at high altitudes, even at 5000ft they sometimes won't start properly. The mechanics worldwide discovered nasty stuff with rockets, even 50 years after they collected sience results. Challenger disaster and many more. Btw it's a monopropellant Not sure I'd want high test H2O2 in close proximity to my body on any skydive.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkZero 0 #56 July 29, 2010 Quote Not sure I'd want high test H2O2 in close proximity to my body on any skydive. To be honest...he hate it, but he love the push ...your mother... www.pralle-zeiten.de Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trae 1 #57 July 30, 2010 If this could STOL and had jets instead of props I want one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyjester 0 #58 July 30, 2010 Quote If this could STOL and had jets instead of props I want one. ME TOO !!! don´t pester the jester . . or better: WHY SO SERIOUS ? ? www.pralle-zeiten.de Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
