0
buzzfink

NewUSPA Age rule, Tandems, 16 with notarized consent-Will your DZ use it?

Recommended Posts

Here is the new age BSR from the latest USPA meeting:

The requirement for tandem jumpers to be at least age of legal majority was removed from the BSRs. Now all skydivers, regardless of type jump, must meet the same requirements: 18 years of age or 16 with notarized parental or guardian consent.



What do you think????


Buzz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not in Texas, since even if every single living relative signed the release of liability, the state or outside parties could still sue and win. Simpily because the release of liability is a contract, in TX you have to be 18 to enter into a contract.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22bill+booth%22+tandem+waiver+consent+contract&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=20020719125750.01999.00001738%40mb-md.aol.com&rnum=1

Note point #5. Does the USPA think this is no longer true???
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We will ABSOLUTELY use it at Raeford as well as my dad's dropzone in Alabama. It is ridiculous that we have been training 16 year-olds to skydive since I was a toddler, yet have not been able to take 16 year olds on much-safer tandems.

edited to add that I will not hesitate to take any 16 year old on a tandem with my own rig either.

Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would be very surprised to find Crosskeys letting 16 year olds out on tandems. I think there have only ever been 2 people who were allowed to do AFF under the age of 18 and they were both relatives of long time locals.

The only exception would maybe be kids who were locals and even then, I wouldn't count on it.

Methane Freefly - got stink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We will ABSOLUTELY use it at Raeford



I agree, as long as it passes through the next wicket, which I see as being Relative Workshop changing their previous stance (read it here). This being, of course, since the primary tandem rig used at Raeford is the Sigma.

I have already told one of the owners of the school that I could fill an entire weekend tandem day with people I have turned away because their kids were not yet 18.

[whine] I hope it changes, if for no other reason than I won't have to explain the backwards sounding age limitations between AFF training and a Tandem. [/whine]

This will be interesting to watch.
Arrive Safely

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not correcting Aggie Dave, but Aggieland's answer is I don't know. I have to consult our lawyer and see.

My suspicion is that it will be the same as before due to the risks and taking them without a waiver.

We don't currently take anyone under 18. I would like to change it, but unless things have changed on the legal side, I doubt we will.

Todd


I am not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We live in a sue happy society and our only protection is the waiver. Take someone skydiving (AFF, tandem, static-line or IAD) under the age of legal consent (which I believe can be as high as 21 in some states), and the impression that I have been given is that you may as well hand your aircraft, facilities and first born child over, should they chose to sue you. Not to mention exposing the gear manufacturers and any other corporations that have any assets to tremendous losses.

I can not imagine why anyone would want to do that. It has the potential to leave less skydiving places around for the jumpers to jump at, and less equipment for jumpers to choose from.B|

Remember they don't even have to win the law suit, just the cost of defending the suit is astronomical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We will ABSOLUTELY use it at Raeford as well as my dad's dropzone in Alabama. It is ridiculous that we have been training 16 year-olds to skydive since I was a toddler, yet have not been able to take 16 year olds on much-safer tandems.

edited to add that I will not hesitate to take any 16 year old on a tandem with my own rig either.

Chuck



- A child under 18 cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
- A parent cannot sign away a child's right to sue.
- Therefore a valid waiver cannot exist for a child under 18.

So if we aren't going to require a valid waiver for people UNDER 18, why require it for people OVER 18?
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you can teach people to skydive at 16, which we have been doing since I was born, then it's ridiculous to not be able to take them on a tandem. Once again, I can promise you that our dropzone will immediately start doing so once all the gates are cleared. Also, I, as an independant contractor, will not hesitate to do so with my Racer once the word is given. If you live your life in fear of being sued, then you might as well just not ever get any sort of instructional rating or start any skydiving-related business. I don't have such fears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If you can teach people to skydive at 16, which we have been doing since I was born, then it's ridiculous to not be able to take them on a tandem. Once again, I can promise you that our dropzone will immediately start doing so once all the gates are cleared. Also, I, as an independant contractor, will not hesitate to do so with my Racer once the word is given. If you live your life in fear of being sued, then you might as well just not ever get any sort of instructional rating or start any skydiving-related business. I don't have such fears.



And again the question:
So if we aren't going to require a valid waiver for people UNDER 18, why require it for people OVER 18?

If the DZ's turn someone away at 16, they will likely be back at 18. Most people only ever make one jump, so you will still get their money for that jump. So what have you gained for giving up the protection of the waiver? Nothing.
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bottom line is that waivers do not stop anyone from suing you. Especially if you ARE negligent in any way, then waiver or not, you will lose.

But if you are NOT negligent, and you get sued, then the waiver and contract allows you to countersue for legal fees, etc.

If they are 16, the contract is meaningless. But you could have the family sign the contract, then you still have someone to sue for your costs should they decide to sue you later on when they turn 18. By then, the people that signed your contract are probably moved on, or at least it would be quite a difficult paper trail you would have to produce.

I would be in favor of it if we did something like Perris, where we record and catalog on video their statements of acceptance of the risks, as well as have the paper trail to follow. I think at that point, you could mount a considerable defense.

However, if you actually did fuck up and hurt someone, then it is all moot.

TK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If you can teach people to skydive at 16



I completely agree that kids should be able to skydive. I hope to have kids someday, and I will get my tandem rating expressly for the purpose of taking them skydiving. Either that, or I'll just have SkyMonkey do it ;)

But I don't think it will be long before a 16-y/o is hurt and their parents sue. It's all about the risk you are willing to take. BillBooth is making that statement that if you do it with his gear, you are also putting his company at risk, as well as the USPA and your dropzone.

USPA says that it's OK to take a 16 y/o. Your dropzone may say it's OK, and it's OK with you. So if you can jibe it with the gear manufacturer, then everyone's willing to accept the risk and there's no problem.

I know in Colorado, a minor (under 18) can't even ENTER a legal agreement legally, so if they sign anything, it's not binding. Also, I know (at least it used to be) that a parent could not sign away their child's rights here as well. That makes both signatures (parent and minor) not-binding, which will probably get the waiver thrown out in court.
Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a question for the lawyers out there, in Texas a parent signs for a 16 year old to get their drivers license. It's a conditional license and can be taken away utill they turn 18. This would seem a comparable event to signing a waiver for anything including skydiving.

or is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just a question for the lawyers out there, in Texas a parent signs for a 16 year old to get their drivers license. It's a conditional license and can be taken away utill they turn 18. This would seem a comparable event to signing a waiver for anything including skydiving.

or is it?



This is the opposite situation. Rather than RELEASING someone from liability, the person doing the signing is ASSUMING liability. Example:

http://www.dot.state.az.us/mvd/azwelcome.htm#ObtainALicense
"If you are under 18, your application for an instruction permit or driver license must be signed by at least one adult. The adult will be responsible for any negligence or willful misconduct when you are driving."
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Users of Relative Workshop Tandem equipment:
Please be aware that this change in the BSR's does not free you from your contactual responsibility not to allow anyone "below the age of majority" to use our tandem equipment. It is paragraph 11 in your User Agreement. Waivers are available from Relative Workshop for extraordinary circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We will still not take "whuffo" children on tandems (or any other skydive) till they turn 18 because of the liability issue.

Note I'm referring to "whuffo" children. My daughter has been hanging around DZ's for several years now, knows how to pack, knows the tandem videos verbatim, has done homework assignments on skydiving, etc. This BSR change happened on 7/18/2004, which just so happened to be my daughter's 16th birthday. :)
Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So if we aren't going to require a valid waiver for people UNDER 18, why require it for people OVER 18?



Great fucking point. If the student is under the age of majority in that particular state, there is no use in having the waiver. Period. Just let them show and go, since it's the same effect, and less time.

If your state allows the age of majority at 16, then fine. Make them do the waiver.

Where do I see this going? I see places like the Uninsured Relative Workshop entering into agreements with DZ's stating either, "You will not use this gear for a passenger under the age of 18" and/or "DZ will indemnify and hold harmless [manufacturer] for all incidents involving the use of this equipment with a passenger under the age of 18."

The manufacturers may eventually simply not send the tandem equipment to DZ's that allow tandem passengers under the age of majority for that state.

Be aware....


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0