liftedtitan 0 #1 December 17, 2009 Student looses both instructors, AF #1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Tj2ZotItcMoriuntur omnes, sed non omnes vixerunt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #2 December 17, 2009 The woman is definitely too small to be jumping with this guy. The main side guy may be as well. Neither one of them had any reason to let go of this guy as he was stable when they did; inverted but stable. Good thing he fixed it himself because they would have been no help to him. What I also found strange was the casual way the main side guy re-docked. If you are main side and you lose your guy you do not need a smooth dock, you need an immediate dock. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 1 #3 December 18, 2009 Glad to see the sport is progressing. Head-down training on AFF-1. Awesome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #4 December 18, 2009 Hope he got a free 2nd jump!! ..... If he ever did a 2nd (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #5 December 18, 2009 The video guy did an awesome job though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #6 December 18, 2009 Quote The video guy did an awesome job though. Yeah...and talk about a really nice airplane! ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ufk22 32 #7 December 18, 2009 Should have been labeled "Both instructors lose student"This is the paradox of skydiving. We do something very dangerous, expose ourselves to a totally unnecesary risk, and then spend our time trying to make it safer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #8 December 19, 2009 QuoteThe woman is definitely too small to be jumping with this guy. The main side guy may be as well. Neither one of them had any reason to let go of this guy as he was stable when they did; inverted but stable. Good thing he fixed it himself because they would have been no help to him. What I also found strange was the casual way the main side guy re-docked. If you are main side and you lose your guy you do not need a smooth dock, you need an immediate dock. I thought I saw a weight belt on the reserve-side JM. I'm thinking there was a lack of JM pre-jump communication on who handles what and who releases on inversions. Even so, maybe both thought they were not contributing to the fix. IMHO,it's a rare AFFI that can legitimately claim that no student has ever gotten away from them temporarily. Personally, I don't see it as a major problem unless it's a regular occurrence with those JMs...or, if they had NOT gotten back on well above pull time. I would think a smooth, controlled dock is preferable. In this case, the re-dock was well above pull altitude...no need for drastic measures.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #9 December 19, 2009 QuoteI'm thinking there was a lack of JM pre-jump communication on who handles what and who releases on inversions. That was my exact thought when I saw it. Nothing terribly violent to make both of them unable to hang on. I agree that it was just lack of communication. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MomDaBomb 0 #10 December 21, 2009 Is that the normal exit for that type of plane? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 599 #11 December 21, 2009 There is enough blame to go around for everyone. IOW Everyone made mistakes on that dive. The problem started with the student inventing a new exit (eg. rotating about his heels as he fell off the plane.) I can understand why the reserve side instructor let go, but am mystified as to why the main side instructor let go????? To their credit, everyone flew properly in the second half of the freefall. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #12 December 21, 2009 QuoteI thought I saw a weight belt on the reserve-side JM I thought I saw her booties were rolled up and tucked inside her jumprsuit leg up by her knee. If we both saw what we thought we saw, she should have thought about passing the student to a bigger AFFI. Putting on a weight belt, or rolling up your jumpsuit is one thing, but when you need weights and to roll up your already tight RW suit, you might be pushing your personal limits a bit. Overall, the student didn't do too bad, but if he had really balled up, I think he would have given that AFI a real run for her money. Don't even get me started on the camera guy. When the exit rolled on the hill, I understood how they got away from him, but nothing can explain the rest of the jump. I hope the student wasn't paying for that video. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 599 #13 December 21, 2009 "QuoteIs that the normal exit for that type of plane?" ..................................................................... That is the normal AFF exit from a Skyvan (or most other types of airplane with tail gates/ramps). However,the student forgot about gently jumping up. For a student - that big - it is important to only jump up enough to lift your feet off the ramp, because jumping too high will connect the back of your head with the edge of the ramp.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites