22 22
quade

DB Cooper

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, snowmman said:

Flyjack,

Why do you bother spending time calling people stupid? 

This isn't about curing cancer. It's just db cooper.

Calling someone stupid over something they say about db cooper investigation, is a little much, don't you think?

I mean, in the end, none of this matters. Why so serious?

I dunno. Maybe it's because everyone involved in the Cooper case knows that YOU are the guy who ripped off Cooper suspect Sheridan Petersen's 600 plus page anti-war book and published it for twenty-five samolians a pop in paperback at Amazon. 

And when you did that, and made smart-ass remarks directed at me when I protested, many people saw all that. And Sheridan's family is now getting zippo for royalties. You think that is fair to his family? To his legacy? Are you like an actual human being or what? Would you like to see Sheridan's own emails to me on this subject?

Oh, I will gladly provide them if you wish. Mr. Infringer. Mr. Ignore-the-US-Library-of-Congress record on his book. I have posted it a couple of times for you already. 

Call me stupid, but that could be it. It is a credibility problem. Why should anyone believe what you say when you had the absolute nerve to rip off Sheridan's book while he was sitting in a retirement home at age 95 or so? Yeah, you should be real proud of that.

I'd post a link to the book you ripped off with encouragement from those DB Cooper Forum members, but that would be supporting copyright infringement. 

Ever considered the idea that ripping off some old guy's book, someone known pretty well in Cooperland, might tell folks you ain't what you seem? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
7 hours ago, snowmman said:

Flyjack,

Why do you bother spending time calling people stupid? 

This isn't about curing cancer. It's just db cooper.

Calling someone stupid over something they say about db cooper investigation, is a little much, don't you think?

I mean, in the end, none of this matters. Why so serious?

I called Georger a liar and a fraud because he is, absolutely toxic for this case.

I have caught him just manufacturing evidence to win an argument.

But, his primary strategy has been to take my posts here twist them out of context or outright lie about them report them there and ridicule, smear and discredit me. He has done this for years.

He is full blown narcissist who need to be part of the Cooper narrative but has nothing to add so he discredit others to get attention.

The only recourse I have to correct the record here.

I have had two productions contact me about a Hahneman project and they read Shutter's site... that includes Georger's lies and defamation.

The last one, I quoted Tom Kaye EXACTLY and Georger tried to discredit me. This is insane. Now, he is trashing Tom Kaye. He is a complete fraud. He got jealous and flew off the handle because I was credited with helping Tom with the diatom research, Check the bottom of the paper.

His lies get read and just accepted over there and that empowers him, you people over there need to call him out on this crap. If he agrees with you he will heap false praise but if he disagrees he just lies because he can't formulate a rational argument. 

I don't know anybody who is OK with somebody persistently lying about them and their positions to discredit them.. this has gone on for years. He is a few bills short of  money packet.

Everybody knows Georger is toxic, most just avoid him so they don't get targeting by him. I moved here and he just copies all my stuff from here.

Georger's 15 minutes were over long ago, he adds nothing and drives people away from engaging in discussions over there. On any other forum he would have been log sisnce banned but Shutter accommodates him with a scolding now and then.

I don't have a problem with people taking my posts in context, I have a problem with liars.

Why don't you ask Georger why he needs to persistently lie and discredit others?

because he hasn't done it to you...

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Snowmman,

I got trashed, ridiculed and told to shut up for expressing exactly what you are now saying about the packets, bundles and bands..

The money went to Cooper in packets of 100 then those rubber banded into bundles.

The evidence supports bank bands for the packets and rubber bands for the bundles.

Carr and Georger got it wrong, they mixed up bundles and packets..  they were told the bundles were randomized to make the money look hastily prepared and assumed that meant individual packets.

Carr stated..

November 29, 2007 · Report reply

The money was packaged in varying amounts, so one bundle would have $500.00 another $1,000.00, there was no uniformity to it. I have been searching for the evidence report from the lab but have not found it yet, lots of files to go through. When I get it you'll be the second to know.

Clearly, he mixed up the bundle and packets.. the packet counts were not randomized. The bundles were.

 

My conclusion is..

The money was strapped in packets of 100's. (HIMMELSBACH)

The packets were then rubber banded into bundles of random counts of packets.

They randomized the bundle count not the packets and did not open individual packets.

The money went to Cooper in the same order as the micro.

The TBAR money had rubber band frags attached, those rubber bands are likely from the bundle not individual packets.

That means, it is very likely that the TBAR money arrived as one single rubber banded bundle as the FBI has stated. As the rubber bands deteriorated the packets seperated slightly.

We need to discern between packets and bundles. Random counts and random order.

and when "packets" are mentioned Georger blows a gasket. This has been explained to him many times and he refuses to admit the error.

 

But, the takeaway is to bust the long standing myth that money must have arrived as three separate packets. That changes the means by which the money could have arrived on TBAR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

Snowmman and Georger. Two peas in a pod. Both stubborn as hell. They are never wrong, even when they are. 

Here's what I did this week on the Cooper case: Exactly nothing. (*laughs*) 

I was wheeling and dealing in vehicles so I can have some more fun out in the wilderness, which to me is far more important than the BS that surrounds Cooper sometimes. 

The reason I am SO angry at Snowmman is because I am the owner of a registered US trade publishing company, no matter how small it is, and I take offense to Snowmman's arrogant theft of Sheridan's book. For what? So a few assholes at a Cooper convention could show up with bragging copies? That's enough reason to cheat Sheridan's family out of the royalties they have coming to them? That is enough reason to steal a book that (due to its extreme length, over 600 pages) took him years to write? And that this was done to him while he was sitting there in a retirement community and unable to fight back about it due to health issues and being well over 90 years old? You think he was happy about all this?

Bullshit. You should see his emails to me. He talks about going to the FBI about it. I had to gently remind him that it would be a civil matter and he would have to get an attorney to have the book pulled from Amazon. 

I have explained to Snowmman that publishing the book at Amazon under CreateSpace results in a very high retail price, no wholesale price available...which means no jobbers will pick it up and very few sales will be the result. No worldwide wholesale distribution through Ingram, (biggest distributor of print books on Planet Earth). There isn't even a reasonably priced Kindle version. The guy doesn't want to hear any of that. He doesn't want to cooperate with AB of Seattle to enable the book at wholesale worldwide by a professional. 

Yeah. That would be me. We may be small, but we are moving copies of Into The Blast worldwide at wholesale by the case, which is 52 copies per order. Sheridan's book should be doing the same thing, and then for every case sale logged by Lightning Source (printer/distributor for Ingram) Sheridan's family would make a hundred bucks to any PayPal address they designate. 

But nooooo....Snowmman will have no part of that. I'm not surprised. He doesn't even realize that Snowman has only ONE FRICKIN' M in it... 

I know some of you will want to know what I meant by 'wheeling and dealing in vehicles this week so I can have some more fun in the wilderness...' Okay, I will explain. 

First...I laid out $2,400 for the nice Coleman tent trailer shown in the pictures below. So now I am DOWN $2,400 bucks. Guess I finally decided to hang up the tent thing. That's a picture from the seller's ad. It looks somewhat nicer now. 

Camper3.jpg.da1465e96c59d169e2b89d74ebcaf1e5.jpg

Camper2.jpg.a38f532cc395da70c8db78a9ab360e76.jpg

Camper1.jpg.80693fc74504d931ef1c47f02130e5fd.jpg

Then...I sold the truck shown below for $4,800. The guy drove two hours to buy it. Trust me, it's worth it. And the reason I sold it is because it wouldn't haul the trailer. So now...I have the trailer but I am now UP $2,400 bucks...

NewTiresforInternet.jpg.5e03c65c514f2cd82142fc579b2e283c.jpg

Now that I have the trailer and am UP this $2,400 bucks in savings as a result of selling the truck...I wangle a great deal on a 2009 Nissan Xterra for a measly $3,000...which CAN pull the trailer. Are you following all this? It's complicated. 

2009Xterra.jpg.5110b71f454082032f7909f619f41c5a.jpg

In the end, I traded the 1997 truck and $600 bucks for the camper and the Xterra. 

Tell me I don't know how to wheel and deal on vehicles. Of course I do. I once sold a Mustang to Christopher Boyce, aka The Falcon, aka a convicted spy. He was played by Timothy Hutton in the famous movie that came later. Sean Penn played (wait for it now), The Snowman. B) Spelled correctly with only ONE 'm'.

Message for Snowmman: Anytime you decide to have a conscience about Sheridan Petersen and his book, you can reach me at adventurebooksofseattle AT G Frickin' Mail Dot Frickin' Com. 

Edited by RobertMBlevins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Georger is lying again, he just can't stop.

He is claiming my TBAR money view comes from two 302's. That is not true I have never claimed that, Georger is just making it up like he always does. There are many sources.

A reminder,, Georger lies about Tina and the statement "bank type bands". He claimed she meant rubber bands and was contacted. She wasn't, Georger lied.

Georger is a perpetual liar. His specialty is innuendo and red herrings..

He has had this wrong for a decade and STILL won't admit he has been wrong. To maintain his denial he just lies..

 

Tina handled the money and saw "bank-type bands around each package"..

tinamoney.jpeg.f3cc217fd7c96a07bc63ce35e074e172.jpeg

 

Georger's lies..  

"SHE said rubber bands, not straps, not paper" (NO she didn't)

"SHE meant rubber bands" (NO she didn't)

"SHE was contacted and asked" (NO she wasn't)

"so was Mrs Ingram" (Georger shifts from Tina to Mrs Ingram)

"the common ENGLISH meaning of "bank bands" is "rubber bands" (NO it isn't)

 

georgertinalie.jpg.c07dc5d90ae45cf2f7d032534f748b8b.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why I don't post most of my research... too bad as everyone loses.

Snow-hole's ungrateful attitude in using my research. At least he didn't claim it was his like Ulis did.

If I post something I expect it to be shared, not disrespected. You are done Snow.

snowhole.jpeg.b7e638aa8ef59d603fd09d637a304e27.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
4 hours ago, FLYJACK said:

This is why I don't post most of my research... too bad as everyone loses.

Snow-hole's ungrateful attitude in using my research. At least he didn't claim it was his like Ulis did.

If I post something I expect it to be shared, not disrespected. You are done Snow.

snowhole.jpeg.b7e638aa8ef59d603fd09d637a304e27.jpeg

You can do better than that! 

Learn to insult like a pro! win friends and influence people!

Give me a hint about what I lost? Your affection? Your time? What's your time worth? Your brainpower?
Everything is replaceable. So are you. Get used to it.

Ah the tragedy of being one of many billion on planet earth.

We're all just ants!

The trick is becoming more than an ant!

Good luck!

 

Edited by snowmman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

 

17 hours ago, RobertMBlevins said:

Snowmman and Georger. Two peas in a pod. Both stubborn as hell. They are never wrong, even when they are. 

 

Message for Snowmman: Anytime you decide to have a conscience about Sheridan Petersen and his book, you can reach me at adventurebooksofseattle AT G Frickin' Mail Dot Frickin' Com. 

no conscience here.

walking dead man. etc.

Edited by snowmman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, FLYJACK said:

This is why I don't post most of my research... too bad as everyone loses.

Snow-hole's ungrateful attitude in using my research. At least he didn't claim it was his like Ulis did.

If I post something I expect it to be shared, not disrespected. You are done Snow.

snowhole.jpeg.b7e638aa8ef59d603fd09d637a304e27.jpeg

"You are done, Snow" sounds like some kind of threat.

So how do internet threats get carried out?

Can people threaten others on this forum? Why the heck would dropzone.com host a forum where people actively threaten others? ...geez I thought jumpers had some ethics/comradrie etc!

Not? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, snowmman said:

"You are done, Snow" sounds like some kind of threat.

So how do internet threats get carried out?

Can people threaten others on this forum? Why the heck would dropzone.com host a forum where people actively threaten others? ...geez I thought jumpers had some ethics/comradrie etc!

Not? 

Sounds like a lot of things..

Why would dropzone allow a permanently banned A-hole back on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, FLYJACK said:

Sounds like a lot of things..

Why would dropzone allow a permanently banned A-hole back on?

 

50 minutes ago, FLYJACK said:

Sounds like a lot of things..

Why would dropzone allow a permanently banned A-hole back on?


I hereby announce this thread is all about me.

Please continue!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
59 minutes ago, snowmman said:

 


I hereby announce this thread is all about me.

Please continue!

 

You really are proud of yourself,,  I was right not to give you my serial list.

Lesson learned, be very careful who you trust in the Cooper world... 

 

I always thought there should be a closed forum with trusted people to discuss things without this type of BS... there is some outside the forum.

But, having been on many diverse forums, the Cooper world has some of the worst people.

Anyway Snow, good luck with your Sheridan nonsense.

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
6 hours ago, snowmman said:

 

no conscience here. (Robert says: Regarding his copyright violation of Sheridan Petersen's registered-with-the-Library-of-Congress anti-war book, and being foolish enough to publish it RETAIL ONLY through Amazon's CreateSpace.)

walking dead man. etc.

Yes, I know. But I don't make threats on the internet, which are pointless anyway. Sometimes I do try to bring people to reason and sensibility though. You are cheating Sheridan's family out of what is rightfully theirs, (wholesale distribution royalties) even though at the start your motives might have been good. You also claimed you were a better book editor than me, which is patently false and certainly ridiculous. I have edited more than sixty books and created the covers myself for almost twenty of them. 

Forget about me then, if you have no morals. How about buying at least three unassigned ISBN's from Bowker's, registering an account with Lightning Source, and moving Sheridan's book into wholesale distribution worldwide with a new ISBN instead. Then arrange with one of Sheridan's family members to receive royalties via PayPal. You could do the right thing. You don't even need me for that. Some of those books went on to great success. This is why I still do book packaging for people occasionally. 

Or you could pull that book from Amazon, which isn't selling anyway (I have seen the rankings on it, which are pathetic) and let The Pros From Dover take over the job. 

Maybe you should take over some other books that you think need improvement and violate copyright on them as well? Of course, not all the people you do that to will be in a nursing home community and over the age of 90. Not all of them will be easy victims for you. I also know that Amazon and everywhere else always asks if you own the rights to the work you are about to ask them to host. And of course...you were forced to lie and say you DID own the rights when everyone in Cooperland knows you did NOT. 

If you believe I am trying to shame you here, well...I guess I am. Imagine what the outcry would be about me if I 'improved' on Bruce Smith's book (I still have the original Word version he sent me long ago) and decided to publish MY version. He would be screaming to high heaven, doing major complaints, all legal, and everyone in Cooperland would be on my ass. 

My question is, what gives YOU the right to do that to Sheridan Petersen, a guy who could barely defend himself against you. You haven't asked, but you should see his emails to me while you were doing this. Maybe I will just publish them anyway. They were sent to me, so that would be allowed. 

Edited by RobertMBlevins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. The frog lets the scorpion climb on its back and begins to swim. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature."

 

There are lots of scorpions in the world, the Cooper world has its share, they can't change it is just their narcissistic nature.

Unfortunately, they lose and everybody loses. That is the reason I DO NOT share most of my research.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, RobertMBlevins said:

 

My question is, what gives YOU the right to do that to Sheridan Petersen, a guy who could barely defend himself against you. You haven't asked, but you should see his emails to me while you were doing this. Maybe I will just publish them anyway. They were sent to me, so that would be allowed. 

Hi Robert Blevins.

Feel free to publish any emails Sheridan wrote attacking me. I have no problem with that. In fact, I'm curious.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/10/2021 at 3:04 PM, FLYJACK said:

This is why I don't post most of my research... too bad as everyone loses.

Snow-hole's ungrateful attitude in using my research. At least he didn't claim it was his like Ulis did.

If I post something I expect it to be shared, not disrespected. You are done Snow.

snowhole.jpeg.b7e638aa8ef59d603fd09d637a304e27.jpeg

Just like Georger, apparently Mr Snow-hole can't read.

I said if I post it I expect it to be shared. What part of that are you having a problem understanding.

The dick move was was your disrespectful comments after using my work.

Are you that dense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/8/2021 at 5:28 PM, FLYJACK said:

Thought I had posted before,, but

The TBAR shoreline right at the money spot looks to have been replenished before the famous 1974 dredge operation and after Sept 71.. 

Remember, the 74 dredge operation shows South of the money spot, this is exactly at the money spot.

September 1971 on the left and Jul 1973 on the right.

Two bumps on the shoreline..

Locals said the money find spot was replenished regularly. The spot is at the very N end of the Fazio property.

 

1948300805_1971-1973copy.jpeg.03805e5b8ec0ba9603ddbaa8de9c1370.jpeg

Here it is...

The dredging was continuous until October 1974.

So, the TBAR spot was hit (continuously) with dredge material between NORJAK and Oct 1974.

Everyone was focussed on the 1974 dredge spoils South of the money spot. There was dredging before that. Game changer.

dredging.jpeg.d2ca3e08af986d0da5957776e43c1cbd.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
15 hours ago, snowmman said:

Hi Robert Blevins.

Feel free to publish any emails Sheridan wrote attacking me. I have no problem with that. In fact, I'm curious.

Thanks.

I am sure you are curious. And if you are not being facetious and really want to see them, you will have to ask me privately and they will be provided in the same manner. Look...I understand that at the time you did what you did...you thought you were doing Sheridan a favor. Maybe you were. But now that Sheridan has passed on, all that you are doing by refusing to allow his book into real-world distribution is cheating his family. They should be making money on that book, but you are holding that up and basically ripping them off. 

Really now....how many copies did you actually expect would sell at Amazon when it is offered up at retail-only at a whopping 25 dollars in paperback? That was okay when the book existed in that form simply so Sheridan could get a look at it in print before he died. But now that need is no longer there. He has passed on. Now it is time to place that book into the worldwide wholesale distribution chain, and that means Lightning Source/Ingram. You could do that yourself. But LSI requires a business name, even if it is just Joe Smith Books, at least three unassigned ISBN's from Bowker's, a responsible SSN (not good) or a Federal Tax ID number (much better) as well as a bank account and a PayPal account to do business with them. Unless you are planning to go into the publishing biz yourself, it is a big waste of time and money for you to buy the required minimum of ISBN's, jump through the other hoops, and sign with them. 

I am on a fixed income these days, mostly retired although I do side cleaning jobs and occasional book edits for private customers. How the heck do you think I afford the things I do anyway? Book royalties are a part of that. Blast has been selling steadily for over ten years now, plus Pilot Down, Presumed Dead, and a couple of others that do pretty well at AB. If I had published all that through Amazon's CreateSpace I would hardly collect anything. That's why you should get that book off CreateSpace and allow Sheridan's family to reap whatever royalties they have coming from his book. 

I will give it to you that at the beginning your heart was in the right place, minus a few nasty comments you made at the DB Cooper Forum when I protested what you were doing. But now that Sheridan is gone and only his family remains, you should cease cheating them out of whatever sales that book will do in worldwide at wholesale. I am not your enemy. You did get the ball rolling. But you should now let someone professional take over the job. 

What I need from you is a copy of the manuscript in Word (not PDF), your promise to pull the book from Amazon, and contact information for any of Sheridan's children. The oldest daughter will do, if you have her info. I'm pretty sure you have contacted his family once or twice. I don't really believe you are dishonest, from the little I know of you. But it is time now to do what is right. 

Edited by RobertMBlevins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RobertMBlevins said:

I am sure you are curious. And if you are not being facetious and really want to see them, you will have to ask me privately and they will be provided in the same manner. Look...I understand that at the time you did what you did...you thought you were doing Sheridan a favor. Maybe you were. But now that Sheridan has passed on, all that you are doing by refusing to allow his book into real-world distribution is cheating his family. They should be making money on that book, but you are holding that up and basically ripping them off. 

Really now....how many copies did you actually expect would sell at Amazon when it is offered up at retail-only at a whopping 25 dollars in paperback? That was okay when the book existed in that form simply so Sheridan could get a look at it in print before he died. But now that need is no longer there. He has passed on. Now it is time to place that book into the worldwide wholesale distribution chain, and that means Lightning Source/Ingram. You could do that yourself. But LSI requires a business name, even if it is just Joe Smith Books, at least three unassigned ISBN's from Bowker's, a responsible SSN (not good) or a Federal Tax ID number (much better) as well as a bank account and a PayPal account to do business with them. Unless you are planning to go into the publishing biz yourself, it is a big waste of time and money for you to buy the required minimum of ISBN's, jump through the other hoops, and sign with them. 

I am on a fixed income these days, mostly retired although I do side cleaning jobs and occasional book edits for private customers. How the heck do you think I afford the things I do anyway? Book royalties are a part of that. Blast has been selling steadily for over ten years now, plus Pilot Down, Presumed Dead, and a couple of others that do pretty well at AB. If I had published all that through Amazon's CreateSpace I would hardly collect anything. That's why you should get that book off CreateSpace and allow Sheridan's family to reap whatever royalties they have coming from his book. 

I will give it to you that at the beginning your heart was in the right place, minus a few nasty comments you made at the DB Cooper Forum when I protested what you were doing. But now that Sheridan is gone and only his family remains, you should cease cheating them out of whatever sales that book will do in worldwide at wholesale. I am not your enemy. You did get the ball rolling. But you should now let someone professional take over the job. 

What I need from you is a copy of the manuscript in Word (not PDF), your promise to pull the book from Amazon, and contact information for any of Sheridan's children. The oldest daughter will do, if you have her info. I'm pretty sure you have contacted his family once or twice. I don't really believe you are dishonest, from the little I know of you. But it is time now to do what is right. 

Snow is just trolling you..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
10 hours ago, FLYJACK said:

Here it is...

The dredging was continuous until October 1974.

So, the TBAR spot was hit (continuously) with dredge material between NORJAK and Oct 1974.

Everyone was focussed on the 1974 dredge spoils South of the money spot. There was dredging before that. Game changer.

dredging.jpeg.d2ca3e08af986d0da5957776e43c1cbd.jpeg

Took the bait,,, now they take my work and don't even mention me after trashing me for holding back info....  hehehe.. psychos.

Wet money doesn't make it through a suction dredge in that condition.

Remember guys, 1974 was the last TBAR dredging before 1980, however it was not at the money spot it was South of the money spot. Maybe they can figure this out.

Hint, there was also material barged UP the river and dumped on shores and in the middle of the River above TBAR, if you wanna go with a dredge theory.

and the evidence does not support a Columbia River landing no matter how many times you guy's pat each others back..

Didn't you guys criticize speculation? Except when you do it of course.

The FBI analysis based on the jump test, crew comm's and testimony support about an 8:11/8:12 jump time AND reject the claim that Cooper went back up the stairs to jump later. If you carefully analyzed the evidence it is clear. The big "bump" felt and seen on the gauge was Cooper jumping, it was not Cooper going back up the stairs. It is unfounded speculation to reject the FBI jump time analysis with NO evidence.. people are trying to make the TBAR find fit the flightpath by rejecting evidence. That is Ulis's specialty.

But realistically, TBAR will never be solved beyond a few good theories.

Have fun, do your own homework handwritten double spaced due Dec 31.. no cheating this time, and thank me later.

Edit,, and Georger's work will not be accepted unless it is published in a reputable journal and peer reviewed.

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

This is just getting to complicated for mere mortals...

Wait, what.. dredges carried material upstream from the Lewis,, can this be?

This is just one of my theories....  can't be right.. that would destroy the western flight path, Washougal and Columbia landing theories.... and make too much sense.

 

dredge9.jpeg.e796dce13f52d20ed702cb9d74a99d72.jpeg

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

More dredging mysteries... 

2 other distinct layers..

dredgelayers.jpeg.09d50339e390a6891a796dfbe5683ff3.jpeg

 

washed up rather than dredged..

dredgelayer1.jpeg.3422acfe035ded4466c1798dbba9fd93.jpeg

 

frequently dredged and often floods..

dredgelayer3.jpeg.1133bad1e04c0478a9c54c3a72126e5f.jpeg

 

there is that continuously dredged thing again.

dredgelayer4.jpeg.53c3c7a1e43190ab37f34e918506a67b.jpeg

 

Clay layer probably the 1974 dredge operation. But it was further South, wasn't it.

dredgelayer5.jpeg.763aba3a4e1e585275b097038c3263f4.jpeg

 

US Army Corps of Engineers.. only one dredge operation in 1974,, oops.. somebody is wrong. Unless there were different operations. They state in the vicinity... hmm what could that mean.

dredgelayer6.jpeg.4e6fa252c43935815838ece408af652d.jpeg

 

Would not pass through the "Washington" dredge.. more mysteries.

dredgelayer7.jpeg.2dded2505ca0c9980572635652aae31b.jpeg

 

Oops, the money spot is marked wrong on the map. It is well North of the 1974 dredge spoils, even Ulis figured that one out.

dredgelayer8.jpeg.cff3d12b7c224be604fdbd249d96e0a6.jpeg

 

What do we do, this is too complex,,,, well, form a committee, apply to the Gov for research funding (they just print money anyway) throw in climate change (scam), social justice and nonbinary gender discrimination (marxism), that'll get it done. Do a thorough forensic study to be published and peer reviewed and then, only then can an authorized opinion be rendered 10 years from now.

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)

No Snow,

Your dismissal is hereby rejected.

Dan Cooper: cigarette stains on right hand.

and Georger agreed... you guys need to up your game if you want to solve this.

OK, this is hilarious Georger tried to mock me for posting the facts but he reads the wrong description... the top one is Eugene Cooper, the bottom one is Dan Cooper.. 

I am being ridiculed from a position of shear ignorance.. can't make this stuff up.. HAHAHA...  I can't take it....  this is hilarious.

Learn to read FLYJACK,,  HAHAHA.. stop it man you are killing me.

Snow is still lost,, what a train wreck.

 

cigstain.jpeg.95d0b74acb89da4c773a91d1687e9fc3.jpeg

Edited by FLYJACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

22 22