DB Cooper

[georger 194]

hangdiver

I just wish I got along with my wife as well as georger and robert do...


wait...


I don't have a wife...


my bad...



hangdiver

You mistake me for a four legged animal, sir.
Are you being entertained with impure thoughts?

I don't write the scripts here. Somebody named RobertMBlevins
and Jo Weber do. If it isn't up to the standards you expect or
want, maybe you need to change the script writers?

The rest of us are just spectators and their victims - duhhhhh!
Without foils these people have nothing, quite literally.

But I can understand your frustration. These smut peddlers are
rank novices! For example, tell this guy Blevins to plant his smut
in 14-inch rows. He will get far better germination! Jo
uses the 'seed bag-on-hip' method just like her ancestors. I
doubt she can change at this late date.

Dropzone could set up a separate thread for training smut
peddlers? Then bring them to the DB Cooper thread after a year
or two of training?

It's not my job or my concern, in any event. Good luck.

[georger 194]

skyjack71

Skyjack stated:

Quote

Galen's references to my connections to Tosaw, Cook will NEED to provide in writing with documentations.
(edited for being brief)
If Cook has actually had the access to the FBI he claims - it is against all rules and regulations and a violation of the privacy act.

Georger stated:
***Why would Cook need to prove anything? It's your story and claims! You are the one with the burden of proof!

Jo States:

Duhh! Cook wrote the deflammatory crap!
I am not the one who brought it up. Cook is the one who claims FBI affiliations and inside information.

An attorney making slanderous statements just to keep his stories going (Do U know HOW MANY suspects he has proclaimed in the last 20 plus yrs). 75% of the time he sounds like he is drunk!

He claims he is Cook, but later when the heat is on makes a post that clearly states he is not Cook. When he starts getting flack - claims he's not Cook!

Can't have it both way! Now you are sounding like Knoss (ooohhh! I know you are not going to appreciated that, but it is a truthful statement). Your postings over the yrs. have you bouncing like a rubber ball depending on who pitched the damn thing.

ON the serious side:
Georger you are an exceptionally witty brainiac & YOU find his actions acceptable? One would hardly think you would wander along his destructive path.

Beginning to think you are bored out of your mind - or you just post to agitate.

The multiple stands you take pro & con leaves one wondering why the hell you even post! Other than to act as a buffer for heaven only knows what reason!


One has to take a stand & support it - not go with whatever agitates.

U question why I think U are part of the Past with links to the truths! Review your postings from the beginning & see what I see & then tell me what YOUR real reason for posting here or there is.

You started here as someone to anaylized the money fragments.
Now look were you are? All sucked
up in to the Cooper vortex.

I swear sometimes I think you escaped from a looney bin & then you come it with defenses & common sense & technical skills then you pile garbage on a story?????

One never knows what your mood is going to be from day to day....and they call me a liar & crazy?

Chimpanzee, Monkey, Donkey, an Ass & now a post showing protective ware or whatever that outfit represents.

Beginning to think you need protective gear! Use a boat & it will get a lot of holes put in it - so be sure you have a life preserve. Then you still have to beware of the sharks, so you will need a repellent & a spear gun. Do you know how to use either one of those?

Know the waters you travel!

Don't strain yourself Jo. It's beyond your comprehension and
your purpose. Like Blevins you should stick to milking Dropzone
and let it go at that!

[377 20]

hangdiver

I just wish I got along with my wife as well as georger and robert do...

wait...

I don't have a wife...

my bad...

hangdiver

You sure had a very nice significant other last time you hung with the Cooper crowd Hangdiver. Not gonna put a ring on it huh?

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[377 20]

Jo wrote

Quote

I DO HAVE all of the above & I am contacting the FBI tomorrow - something I had put off hoping Galen would come to his senses and be civil.

To prove the point - I will carry the volumes to the LOCAL FBI office so they can VERIFY I do indeed have these exchanges and the ones I do NOT have printed are on a disk.

In fact if QUADE will agree to it - I will start to copy and paste ALL of them to this thread, but frankly I do NOT want to give Galen that kind of publicity. It is ALL negative, because it PROVES what I have stated above....and does nothing to advance any investigation regarding Weber or Cooper.

I believe I can arrange with the Seattle FBI for the local FBI to view these documents - because Galens CLAIMS of connections to the FBI is a detriment to them...it is against protocol the FBI is required to abide by.

I will have a media personnel accompany me. If this is the kind of negative publicity the FBI does not need. A media person will be sent a copy of all of this plus any arrangements I make with the FBI.

If Cook has actually had the access to the FBI he claims - it is against all rules and regulations and a violation of the privacy act.

Jo,

The FBI doesnt care about any of this. It's just petty bush league bickering to them. Not worth their time.

Doesn't matter who you bring with you. They have heard the media exposure/bad publicity threat a zillion times.

You'll see. Don't say you were not warned.

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[Danielle1010 0]

What about that letter she sent you

[skyjack71 0]

Danielle1010

What about that letter she sent you

All Right Danielle - who is "SHE"?

I am unaware anyone sent Blevins a letter?

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[skyjack71 0]

Attention to ANYONE in possession of information regarding a crime:

Individuals who have NOT been able to discredit me are now engaged in an internet assassination of the most formidable kind & making it public knowledge.

This horrid character assassinations will stop others with information regarding a crime from coming forward.

IT was suggested that one of the most esteemed posters of the DZ is involved & they quoted a Florida Statue. This is over the boundary lines of decency into the realm of slander & is a personal vindication. The individual making the demeaning statements claims to hold a legal position in the state of WA & an intimate relationship with the FBI.

Claimed the courts would use my comments to the FBI & others against me. That one is a new LOW for the FBI if it is true. My attorney just told me he cannot do that nor can the FBI. NOR is the other individual privey to information I shared with the FBI.

The FBI would have to reveal their personal connections with the individual making said claims. The individual supposedly claims to be privey to confidential information.

NO ONE would EVER attempt to come forward with any information about a crime again. I was actually threaten by indivuals the FBI supposedly checked out many yrs ago - individuals the FBI evidently did NOT interview.

Frankly I think I have a right to be upset with the investigation the FBI did. A Shutter man found a file they could not find. The FBI did NOT interview certain individuals...and information provided me was in error. I was NOT supposed to vocalize my thoughts on these things.

I & others on my behalf found actual arrest records the FBI ignored.

This supposed directive of the law even claims another individual directive of law on this thread is aiding them & is playing both sides of the game.

If Had the money I would leave the USA. We are not a democracy with fairness and justice for all. IT is now about WHO you KNOW & WHAT you DID.

I didn't know Weber had such a secretive past - so secret the FBI could provide his widow only the bare minumum regarding his past. Then the next agent doesn't even have knowledge of what the prior agent said.

I was putting all of this down because of my health and my money resources getting low - but, what has been done has only incited me to go public! The FBI allowing & obviously condoning the continued demeaned activities of others is Way over the line.

PUBLIC Jack or Jane Q - if you have knowledge of a crime - keep it to yourself! You are the one who will be thrown under the rails and the next victim.

It is NOT worth the anguish and the pain one has to endure - to involve yourselves.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[georger 194]

skyjack71

Attention to ANYONE in possession of information regarding a crime:


Certain individuals who have NOT been able to discredit me are now engaged in an internet assassination of the most formidable kind and making it public knowledge.

This horrid character assasinations will only keep others with information about a crime from coming forward.

They even suggested that one of the most esteemed posters of the DZ is involved & went so far as to quote a Florida Statue. This is over the boundary lines of decency into the realm of slander. The individual making the demeaning statements claims to hold a legal position in the state of WA.

Claimed the courts could use my comments & rantings & threats to the FBI against me. That one is a new LOW for the FBI if it is true. My attorney just told me he cannot do that nor can the FBI.

The FBI would have to reveal their personal connections with the individual making said claims. The individual supposedly has been privey to confidential information. That is over stepping boundaries.

NO ONE would EVER come forward with any information about a crime again. I was actually threaten by indidivuals the FBI supposedly checked out many yrs ago - individuals the FBI evidently did NOT interview.

This supposed directive of the law even claims another individual directive of law on this thread is aiding them & is playing both sides of the game.

What is a "directive of the law" ?

Can you put it in English?

[georger 194]

RobertMBlevins

Georger says in part:

Quote

'I don't write the scripts here. Somebody named RobertMBlevins and Jo Weber do. If it isn't up to the standards you expect or want, maybe you need to change the script writers?

The rest of us are just spectators and their victims - duhhhhh! Without foils these people have nothing, quite literally...'

Jesus H. Christ. A bigger load of self-serving, self-pitying hogwash I have not heard in a long time. You flatter yourself. You're not my 'foil'. A foil would actually address the content of a post, not just hurl insults one after another as you do.
***
'But I can understand your frustration. These smut peddlers are rank novices! For example, tell this guy Blevins to plant his smut in 14-inch rows. He will get far better germination! Jo uses the 'seed bag-on-hip' method just like her ancestors. I doubt she can change at this late date.'

I already told you. AB doesn't do porno. Your smut reference is ridiculous. And since you decided to bring up what is published by me (albeit in another roundabout insulting way), you are speaking of some very nice books. Like the 48-story sci-fi collection I assembled from 44 different authors worldwide. Or...when I published a 15-year-old girl's novel and made her the happiest kid on Earth, and covered the costs. Or...when we re-issued a classic novel you've certainly heard of in a much better version than the original. We don't do smut. And the above also proves that if you're a scientist, you didn't even bother with the basic research on us. As usual, you just decided to make up whatever BS suits you at the moment.

Quote

'Dropzone could set up a separate thread for training smut peddlers? Then bring them to the DB Cooper thread after a year or two of training?

It's not my job or my concern, in any event. Good luck.'

If there's anything I dislike more than a whiner...it's someone who lies to themselves. You made it 'your concern' a long time ago...with almost each and every post. Stop saying it's 'not you', and then wishing people 'good luck'...and then returning with more insults. If there's anything I dislike worse than a whiner, or someone who lies to themselves...I guess third place would be a phony.

Message=END

To answer an actual question: 'Letter sent to Robert' that Danielle asked about. Dan is referring to the letter sent to AB by Margaret Geestman. She sent it after I think her third or fourth interview. In it she says that even if Kenny was aboard 305 that day, he wasn't hijacking the plane. No, it wasn't that. He was just doing his job as the purser. She says other things, like repeating her previous statement, 'No matter what he may have done, Kenny was still a nice guy...' etc.

I'm glad someone brought that up. I will snapshot the letter and make it into a slide, along with the other new ones we're ordering from Gamma Tech.

I think the legal term Jo was seeking is 'Officer of the Court'. Just thought I'd throw that in.

We've been through this before. You learned nothing. And you a
socalled Editor and Man of Letters? So here it is again for your
benefit, editor Blevins.

The word smut quite literally means a particle of dirt or
soot! Anything that stains or makes dirty or blackens. Matter
including written words that soils or blackens a thing or a
person as in tabloid smut. Surely you have heard the
reference tabloid smut before.

The sexual connotation is secondary and later.

smot to stain, from Middle English smotten; akin to Middle High
German smutzen to stain or Am English smut.
1: matter that soils or blackens; specifically : a particle of
soot. To stain or blacken a thing. Obscene language or written
material that stains a person's reputation or issues.

We've been through this before. Did you learn anything new
tonight? Probably not.

Don't be lazy. Look the word up on the internet for yourself!

Some people would consider your whole book Blast - The True
Story of DB Cooper to be a piece of tabloid fiction or smut.
And if Geoff Gray is correct about the role of sex in KC's life,
your failure to note or even include that as a working element
in KC's life, could be interpreted as an intentional omission on
your part. So, if you insist on a sexual component in my
use of the word smut, then in fact there may be a very
strong sexual element working in your book - intentionally
unreported by you ... which fulfills all of the requirements you
require for use of the word: smut. Agree?

[skyjack71 0]

georger

***

This supposed directive of the law even claims another individual directive of law on this thread is aiding them & is playing both sides of the game.

What is a "directive of the law" ?

Can you put it in English?

Damn you are fast. Wham Bam Thank You kind of Man! Huhh!

Note I said "supposed directive of the law".

Supposedly the sneaky snake in the grass is supposedly claiming knowledge obtained supposedly from FBI sources & supposedly intends to use that information for an action against a witness before or after the fact.

Since Cook is NOT privey to what goes on in the FBI office this is flagrant public extortion or out and out blatant slander or there is an FBI agent out of bounds stating his personal opinion.

Note - the poster also jeopardized and included others in his supposed actions.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[georger 194]

skyjack71

******

This supposed directive of the law even claims another individual directive of law on this thread is aiding them & is playing both sides of the game.

What is a "directive of the law" ?

Can you put it in English?

Damn you are fast. Wham Bam Thank You kind of Man! Huhh!

Note I said "supposed directive of the law".

Supposedly the sneaky snake in the grass is supposedly claiming knowledge obtained supposedly from FBI sources & supposedly intends to use that information for an action against a witness before or after the fact.

Since Cook is NOT privey to what goes on in the FBI office this is flagrant public extortion or out and out blatant slander or there is an FBI agent out of bounds stating his personal opinion.

Note - the poster also jeopardized and included others in his supposed actions.

So you did not mean Officer of the Court which what Blevins
thought you meant.

Beyond this I have no interest in any of this - whatever.

In fact, if you really want to know, (Shutter will confirm), I have
asked that all of this "Bullshit" stop on the other site ... as well
as here!

That states my position in this clearly.

[georger 194]

RobertMBlevins

Georger says in part:

Quote

'We've been through this before. You learned nothing. And you a socalled Editor and Man of Letters? So here it is again for your benefit, editor Blevins.

The word smut quite literally means a particle of dirt or
soot! Anything that stains or makes dirty or blackens. Matter including written words that soils or blackens a thing or a person as in tabloid smut. Surely you have heard the reference tabloid smut before.

The sexual connotation is secondary and later.

smot to stain, from Middle English smotten; akin to Middle High German smutzen to stain or Am English smut.
1: matter that soils or blackens; specifically : a particle of
soot. To stain or blacken a thing. Obscene language or written material that stains a person's reputation or issues.

We've been through this before. Did you learn anything new tonight? Probably not.

Don't be lazy. Look the word up on the internet for yourself!'

More horseshit. The most common use of the word 'smut' in the good old USA refers to pornographic material. 'Middle English' and 'Middle High German' my ass.

I really shouldn't dip my nose in the gutter to address your comments regarding my editing work, but I will make it simple for you. No references to Middle Earth, or Middle English necessary.

When you approach a total of sixty books edited (most of them privately for other authors) and can say you've created nearly 500 illustrated articles for a page with millions of views since 2007...then you can critique my editing skills. Otherwise, your opinion about me means zip. All you do is spend your free time here hacking on others. Does Galen Cook put you up to this? Or the guy you like to lie about in quotes, Geoffrey Gray? Or maybe it's the folks on the alternate site, some of whom were banned from Dropzone for personal attacks. Funny thing...that's pretty much what you do here on a full-time basis.

If so, you should simply hang out there full-time. Like the guy said to me about that place in his PM:

***'They deserve each other over there...'

I have to agree. You're not a Cooper investigator anymore. You spend your time here lashing out at others and spouting more BS than a Jersey cow who has forty acres of nice grass to herself.

Well then contact all the dictionary editors and have them
change it!

You know more than they do.

You know more than anyone does about anything and
everything!

Words have derivations and root meanings whether you and AB
Books likes it or not! You are showing your rank ignorance once
again, Mr. Blevins. Just like when you claimed physics does not
apply in the cabins of aircraft!

Have a nice dream.

[skyjack71 0]

georger

So you did not mean Officer of the Court which what Blevins
thought you meant.

Beyond this I have no interest in any of this - whatever.

In fact, if you really want to know, (Shutter will confirm), I have
asked that all of this "Bullshit" stop on the other site ... as well
as here!

That states my position in this clearly.

Thank You - but, it was not happening here and YOU know who is institagating the crap.
I do not want my grandchildren reading about someone wanting to put their Grandma in a looney bin or even making threats of that kind. I have done NOTHING to deserve what is being shoveled out infront of me.

Trying my best to prepare for 2 more surgeries I need in the next few months - one is because the big surgery they did - did NOT fix me. Before I can do that they have to find out what is going on in my throat...They just keep sending me for test and more tests till I said NO. Just go biopsy it and if it is bad - there will be NO surgery.

I am old enough to know when to say NO Enought IS enough! At any rate thank you putting some clamps on the typing fingers over there. They went there because they didn't want to be here with me - so why the hell do they keep talking about me!

Sick Sick Sick! They must lead pretty boring live for such young men.







In fact it was an ACT of cruelty and their being mean and spiteful.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[georger 194]

RobertMBlevins

I didn't say physics didn't apply in an aircraft.

I said it might be difficult to judge someone's true height in the confines of an aircraft cabin, especially if most of the time the person was sitting down.

And besides, the key statement was 'might be difficult to judge,' not 'for sure you wouldn't be able to tell'.

On Saturday August 9th, at about 7PM, I'm going to present all the evidence that is currently available on Kenny Christiansen. No, I can't say he was Cooper. But there are definitely unanswered questions on him. You can say this or that, and I will show the fifty-seven slides with the explanatory captions. Due to Cooperland crap and trust issues, I'm restricting the audience to Bruce Kitt and anyone who chooses to accompany him, Gayla, Greg the Techie Guy, a few trusted friends whom I've known for years, and anyone from Cooperland who contacts me and convinces me they won't try to ruin it for others. No media. I imagine most of the questions will come from NWA folk.

You see, Georger...I've come to the I-Don't-Give-a-Shit-Point on Christiansen. It's a headache. I have a long attention span, but that span has been reached. This is IT. My co-writer and I will present what we have, mail out the media packs, and then I am officially retired from the Cooper business. It's more trouble than it's worth. You were right when you said using the theater and the media as a way to cram Kenny down the throats of the media was wrong. It would be taking advantage of the event. It was one of the scarce things you've said about me that I thought was right. So I changed up the plan. I think this is the most fair way to present the evidence on KC.

You know that when I do this, chances are the truth on Kenny will emerge at some point. Either he was Cooper, or he wasn't. I'd like it if the first was true, but I won't be jumping off the Ballard Bridge if he wasn't. At this late date, I can handle the truth either way.

My opinion on Kenny is biased. Yes. But then I was the one who interviewed the witnesses, and even though that is subjective, I would not have named Kenny unless I really thought I was right. But that is an opinion only. It is not a fact. My efforts this year have a goal.

To answer the question on Kenny Christiansen once and for all. And for that, I will need the assistance of others. Not Cooperland folk, who can be biased, but answers that come from people without an axe to grind.

Edit: I've sent the attached picture to Bruce Kitt. It's a picture of Kenny with some of his co-workers, and was taken before red uniforms for stews were implemented. I asked Kitt to see if NWA could identify the other people in the picture. My guess is mid-to-late sixties on the photo. You have to love the Kenny Smirk. It's in so many of his pictures, except the one we call The Picture. He looks surprised in that one. He should be. We know he lived alone, and the picture was taken between November 28, 1971 and January 30, 1972. Most likely between Thanksgiving and Christmas.

Blevins - I do understand what you are trying to do. I sometimes
marvel at your persistence. But take a good look at your side by
side photos. It's not going to work. These are two different
people. The math just doesn't add up. But, good luck with your
presentation in any event.

[ParrotheadVol 70]

Robert, which one is the picture?

(Also, the picture with the unidentified people, If KC is the third from the right as the caption says, he is much more effeminate than we thought!!).

"They were saying he was never gonna make it now, now that daylight had set in. But later that night, they were shining those lights back down on that mountain again." - Todd Snider

[sailshaw 0]

Blevins:

The reference photo of Kenney Christensen in a group of four people shows how short he was and could no way be DB Cooper.

He was 5ft 8in and too short to be the 6ft that Cooper is.

Your own photo is the evidence of this problem and therefore he is not a valid suspect!

KENNEY WAS TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT

Bob Sailshaw
[email protected]

Reference you say: "I've sent the attached picture to Bruce Kitt. It's a picture of Kenny with some of his co-workers, and was taken before red uniforms for stews were implemented."

[377 20]

Quote

KENNEY WAS TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT, TOO SHORT

This is Too Short:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Short

Too Short is credited as being one of the pioneer rappers of West Coast hip hop.[1][2][3] Many of his rap lyrics are about pimping, drug use and other sexually-related or explicit/vulgar topics.[4]

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[sailshaw 0]

377:

Ha Ha about TOO SHORT but his name is spelled with a dollar sign in place of the S. TOO $HORT

As a lawyer you should have noticed the difference.

The photo of Blevins attached shows a TOO SHORT Kenney Christensen. Blevins is like the fisherman that steps on his catch until it is long enough to meet the required minimum length. He would have to stomp on Christensen a whole bunch to grow him from 5 ft 8 in to 6 ft in height.

No way does Kenney fit the height of DB Cooper and is not a qualified suspect.

Bob Sailshaw
[email protected]

[skyjack71 0]

The photo of Kenney that is an enlargement of a smaller photo has had some touching up here and there.

Even without the changes - NOTE:
Kenny's ears are too small and you GUYs claimed Duane's were too large. The picture is NOT taken face on but from the bottom of the stairway.

Plus the cap hides his hairline and Kenny was going bald from a very young age. NO wig from the 70's could cover his hair line.
Kenny had No Hair to comb over the wig and a wig would then have required bangs or hair coming down the front and swept to the side. The Composite is pretty clear on without the hair line being concealed.

Most of you NEVER enlarged the composite drawing - an unaltered FBI pic...I do have one, but the file is probably too large to down load here.

When you enlarge the sketch to letter size and do the black & white and also the old natural color of photos from the 60's - hell, I can't pull the name out of my brain right now. The lines with the charcoal marks of the artist - it is all there. Some have mistaken the shading of the FACE and have NOT enlarged it enough to see the actual hair line which he depicted. There was a lot of question about the forward hair line and a slight pitch in the direction of the hair. That was NO specific HARD line PART.

The irregular hair line - Rose did the best he could with. Later other artists for TV only jumped in with their concept, but Florence just gave it up and the TV program did their own thing. THIS TV artist exception only helped to further the mystery and cloud the over all memory of the witnesses. NOW they truely do NOT remember what he looked like. With Florence it is the eyes that she will never forget - the rest is lost to time and multiple pictures the witnesses have viewed over the yrs.

I tried to down load that origina,l but I guess it is too large for the DZ. IF anyone wants to email me and give me an email address I will send it to you and you can see what you can do to ready it for the DZ...NO ALTERATION. I have made sure this one STAYED clean.

I hope the new system aol will send my pic in the high quality it was originally done at. YOU can actually see the pen strokes with the charcoals.

What I wouldn't give for the ACTUAL origninal composite that Rose did. IF it is out there you can bet it will bring a high dollar amount at and on line auction. I just hope who ever gets it will allow reproductions at the original size and quality. What say the FBI disposed of the original?

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[377 20]

Sailshaw wrote

Quote

377:

Ha Ha about TOO SHORT but his name is spelled with a dollar sign in place of the S. TOO $HORT

As a lawyer you should have noticed the difference.

Yeah. How could a lawyer miss a dollar sign?

As for stretching short fish I have no idea what you are talking about.

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[georger 194]

sailshaw

377:

Ha Ha about TOO SHORT but his name is spelled with a dollar sign in place of the S. TOO $HORT

As a lawyer you should have noticed the difference.

The photo of Blevins attached shows a TOO SHORT Kenney Christensen. Blevins is like the fisherman that steps on his catch until it is long enough to meet the required minimum length. He would have to stomp on Christensen a whole bunch to grow him from 5 ft 8 in to 6 ft in height.

No way does Kenney fit the height of DB Cooper and is not a qualified suspect.

Bob Sailshaw
[email protected]

Here's a lighter version of the photo -

[skyjack71 0]

You altered the composite. That is about the lowest dirties thing you ever did. In the photo of the snippet you took from the group pic is what you used of Kenny.

Kenny has been photo shopped, but you went completely over the LINE by photo shopping the composite....to look more like your Kenny. I suggest U change this ASAP.

I will run an ad in your local paper letting them know how LOW you will stoop to sell a book. Remember I have some of the only unaltered originals out there! Maybe the only unshopped or unaltered.

Jo is nobody and No one is going to listen to any thing I have to say, but I hate how all of this is coming down.

How much is the FBI paying you to keep the public off track?

Yes, I am NOT doubting your motives. I do NOT believe you COOKED this recipe up all by yourself. Altering the composite is about as LOW as you can go! It was easier in the photo to ADD to the composite and also to smooth out areas on the photo.

I wanted to think there was something GOOD about you & that you really believed that KC was Cooper - but, you blew it now.

Perhaps you thought if enough people saw the alter composite NO ONE would EVER realize You had made alterations to the original....BE SURE YOU TELL THIS AND STATE THIS WHEN YOU COMPARE HIS PICTURE TO THE COMPOSITE...

I HAVE SENT THE COMPOSITE TO 377 AND HOPE HE CAN DOWN LOAD IT AND GET IT ON THE THREAD...AN ORIGINAL UNALTERED FBI COMPOSITE.

Alter KC all you want but now you have reduced yourself to the level of Cook - ALTERING FBI materials.

No one could see the difference when Cook did this - but JO DID and she MADE IT PUBLIC just as I am doing with you.

Cook changed the jaw and chin to get his look alike - Some of you may not have the artistic EYE and most observers (even in this thread have a hard time spotting the altered composites).

My unaltered one are very high pics . My aol even changes them to send them.

BUT believe you me I DO have copies of the unalter FBI composite & they are at a high resolutions....If I could afford it I would print the glasses and no glasses and send them to the newspapers...The fbi themselves need to be sure that the media is using unaltered composites.

Send them the best originals they have and tell them to destroy any they may have been sent by other parties or at least mark them as ALTERED in the body of the pic.

I am one more time going to send one I know is an original and see if it goes.

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[377 20]

See attached composite drawing which is from Jo.

377

2018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968.

[skyjack71 0]

377

See attached composite drawing which is from Jo.

377

Thank YOU but I finally got the BIG one to down load & at almost 400 KB. I must have gotten a little help from Quade on that one...never been able to download that high before...it took me several tries, but it is there NOW!

Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015 by Jo Weber

[georger 194]

skyjack71

***See attached composite drawing which is from Jo.

377

Thank YOU but I finally got the BIG one to down load & at almost 400 KB. I must have gotten a little help from Quade on that one...never been able to download that high before...it took me several tries, but it is there NOW!

I will throw these into the mix if you want them -