softnotes 0 #1 November 14, 2003 I have seen mention of dropzones not affiliated to the governing bodies such as the USPA (United States) and BPA. I was under the impression that all DZs had to be operated under the auspices of these bodies in their respective countries. Does this mean these dropzones are illegal, or is membership of such bodies not a legal requirement?Blue Skies SoftNotes "That's not flying.... that's falling with style!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jlmiracle 7 #2 November 14, 2003 In the United States we have to abide by the rules of the FAA. JudyBe kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dkpbxman 0 #3 November 14, 2003 In the U.S. , there are plenty of non-USPA DZ's as long as they satisfy the FAA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllyMilne 0 #4 November 14, 2003 QuoteI have seen mention of dropzones not affiliated to the governing bodies such as the USPA (United States) and BPA. I was under the impression that all DZs had to be operated under the auspices of these bodies in their respective countries. Does this mean these dropzones are illegal, or is membership of such bodies not a legal requirement? In britian all dropzones have to be affiliated with the bpa and have the pla cleared by an examiner, although jersey is affialed with the uspa, not sure how but im sure mr griffiths can enlighten us. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WrongWay 0 #5 November 14, 2003 My home DZ is not a USPA affiliated dropzone. We still have to follow the FAA rules and regs, but USPA, nope. Wrong Way D #27371 Mal Manera Rodriguez Cajun Chicken Ø Hellfish #451 The wiser wolf prevails. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dazzle 0 #6 November 14, 2003 QuoteIn britian all dropzones have to be affiliated with the bpa. Is that true? It didn't used to be, we had a few non bpa dz, Bill & Teds rings a bell. I think the deal was that they had to run under an operating procedure that was acceptable to the CAA. The BPA's procedure was acceptable but I don't think that was the only one. I think that a DZ could choose, for example, the USPA or australian regs if it wished to or come up with its own. It may have changed as I think the CAA handed over it's regulation to the BPA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot1 0 #7 November 14, 2003 Quote Does this mean these dropzones are illegal, or is membership of such bodies not a legal requirement? *** The FAA is the "governing body" in the USA, that we as skydivers and dropzones have to answer to. Being a Dropzone Group Member of USPA is a "choice" of the DZ. It doesn't make it an illegal DZ if it's NOT a member, nor does it make the DZ anymore "dangerous" just because it's not a USPA Group Member. Feel free to jump at any dropzone that "you" feel is a good DZ and a safe DZ. Be aware of the people you jump with at ANY dropzone, and dont assume that just because it's a USPA DZ that it's jumpers and planes in are always the safest. Here is some thing you can look at to find out more about the USPA Group Membership Program. http://www.uspa.org/membership/group.htm#gmprogram Edwww.WestCoastWingsuits.com www.PrecisionSkydiving.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0