shorehambeach 9 #1 March 22, 2017 A Private jet caught in the wake of a superjumbo flipped on its back, ROLLED and plunged 10,000ft before pilot pulled off miracle recovery The terrifying incident happened on January 7 this year Bombardier Challenger 604 jet flew about 1,000ft below an Emirates Airbus The near-disaster happened over the Arabian sea, near Oman Wake turbulence caused the plane to flip three times and plunge 10,000 feet The incident caused serious injuries on the small Challenger aircraft A German private plane flipped upside down, rolled uncontrollably and then plunged 10,000ft after hitting wake turbulence caused by an Emirates superjumbo flying above it - but miraculously did not crash. The near-disaster caused serious injuries on the small Challenger jet, which was carrying nine passengers and crew members, and once the pilots initially recovered the plane it was forced to make an emergency landing. The terrifying incident happened on January 7, when a Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet en route over the Arabian sea, about 630 nautical miles southeast of Muscat, Oman, flew 1,000ft below an Emirates Airbus A380-800 flying from Dubai to Sydney in the opposite direction. Though the accident occurred two-and-a-half months ago, information of the incident was only recently revealed in a report by the Aviation Herald. On January 7, a Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet flipped upside down, rolled uncontrollably and then plunged 10,000ft after hitting wake turbulence caused by an Emirates superjumbo flying above it, but miraculously did not crash On January 7, a Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet flipped upside down, rolled uncontrollably and then plunged 10,000ft after hitting wake turbulence caused by an Emirates superjumbo flying above it, but miraculously did not crash The Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet en route over the Arabian sea had flown 1,000ft below the Emirates Airbus A380-800 flying from Dubai to Sydney in the opposite direction, when it got caught in its wake turbulence The Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet en route over the Arabian sea had flown 1,000ft below the Emirates Airbus A380-800 flying from Dubai to Sydney in the opposite direction, when it got caught in its wake turbulence The wake turbulence caused by the superjumbo Airbus - the world's largest passenger jet - was so powerful that about one minute after it passed by, G-force sent the Challenger, which was flying at 34,000 feet, into an uncontrolled roll that flipped the aircraft between three and five times. Wake turbulence is formed behind an aircraft as it flies through the air, much like a boat creates a wake in the water. It is exacerbated by a pair of vortices - whirling masses of air - that spin from the wingtips. The vortices are mostly created when a plane is flying slow and the wings are working hardest to produce lift. The bigger the plane, the bigger the wakes. The most virulent wakes leave smaller planes vulnerable if they run into one. An Airbus A380 is 73 metres long and weighs between 386-560 tonnes, while the Bombardier Challenger 604 is just 21metres long and weighs between 17 and 21 tonnes. When the Challenger faced the Airbus's wake turbulence, both of the plane's engines flamed out and its Ram Air Turbine would not work, causing it to plunge 10,000ft. The aircraft's pilots were able to regain control of the plane using 'raw muscle force' and were finally able to restart the engines. They diverted their flight to Muscat airport in Oman, where they made an emergency landing. Several of the nine people on board were taken to the hospital, with one person sustaining serious injuries in the incident. The aircraft, operated by German carrier MHS Aviation, was totaled, with damage so extensive that it had to be written off. An Airbus A380 is 73metres long and weighs between 386-560 tonnes, while the Bombardier Challenger 604 is just 21metres long and weighs between 17 and 21 tonnes The incident happened at cruising altitudes known as 'coffin corner' because of their high risk. Germany's Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation (BFU) is investigating the incident, despite it happening in international waters. The BFU declined to comment on the investigation because it is ongoing. MailOnline contacted Emirates Airlines and MHS Aviation for comment but have not received a response. An Airbus spokeswoman told IBTimes: 'We are aware that an investigation is ongoing to determine the origin of turbulences encountered by a jet. WHAT IS WAKE TURBULENCE? Wake turbulence is formed behind an aircraft as it flies through the air, much like a boat creates a wake in the water. It is exacerbated by a pair of vortices that spin from the wingtips. The vortices are mostly created when a plane is flying slow and the wings are working hardest to produce lift. The bigger the plane, the bigger the wakes. The most virulent wakes leave smaller planes more vulnerable should they run into one. To avoid issues cause by wakes, air traffic controllers are required to put extra spacing between large and small planes. For pilots, one technique is to slightly alter the approach or climb gradient, remaining above any vortices as they sink. 'At this stage nothing indicates an Airbus A380 aircraft is involved and we cannot comment further on this incident, please contact the German BFU.' A spokesman from the Flight Service Bureau (FSB), an information source for air operators, compared the amazing recovery to the 'Miracle on the Hudson', where pilot Sully Sullenberger landed a US Airways Airbus on the Hudson River after hitting a flock of geese in 2009. But the FSB spokesman said that the incident also raises concerns that the Airbus 380 causes more danger to airways than previously thought. 'With the A380 vs Challenger 604 incident, there is now growing concern amongst aircrews about the effects of the A380's wake turbulence,' the spokesman told The Times. The dangers of wake turbulence have increased as navigation and air-traffic control technology improvements have allowed aircraft to fly closer to one another. The European Aviation Safety Agency will soon release a bulletin to reduce the risk of such encounters. EASA said it had been working on a draft for the bulletin before the Challenger and Airbus incident. 'Wake can be encountered up to 25 nautical miles behind the generating aeroplane,' a draft of the EASA circular to EU airlines and air traffic controllers says, according to the Aviation Herald. 'The encounters are mostly reported by pilots as sudden and unexpected events.' 'When possible, contrails [vapour trails] should be used to visualise wakes and estimate if their flight path brings them across or in close proximity,' the draft says. This isn't the first time a smaller aircraft has faced wake turbulence made by an Airbus 380. In September 2012, a Virgin Australia Boeing 737 hit wake turbulence made by an Emirates A380 near Bali. Both planes made it to their destinations safely. In 2011, an Air France Airbus A320 rolled left to an angle of 25-30 degrees after hitting wake turbulence made by an Emirates A380. No one was injured. Also in 2011, a British Airways Airbus A320 rolled over 50 degrees and the autopilot disconnected after being hit by wake turbulence made by a Qantas Airbus A380 flying from London to Singapore. Four people on the British Airways flight had to be treated for serious injuries. In another 2011 incident, wake turbulence from a Singapore Airlines Airbus 380 caused an Air France Boeing 747 do drop 200ft in 15 seconds and roll left and right. No one was injured, and both planes reached their destinations safely. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Di0 1 #2 March 22, 2017 All these accidents involve an A-380 as the culprit. I'm wondering if it doesn't create a wake turbulence that is somewhat much worse than you'd expect, even after counting the fact that it is the biggest and heaviest commercial airliner out there, and normal distances don't work well when an A380 is involved. I wonder if when they introduced the B747, way back when, they had similar issues with air traffic and wake turbulence that they didn't anticipate. Or maybe your text focuses only on issues created by the A380, but they're in general a much more common occurrence involving other big airliners too?I'm standing on the edge With a vision in my head My body screams release me My dreams they must be fed... You're in flight. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Machine-710 0 #3 March 30, 2017 About a year ago in Frankfurt our (me passenger) A320 went around because the ugly flying forehead had just taken off, normal time separation and stuff, but the fancy meteo sensors perhaps saved our plane from a hard landing or worse. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #4 May 2, 2017 shorehambeach a Bombardier Challenger 604 business jet en route over the Arabian sea, about 630 nautical miles southeast of Muscat, Oman, flew 1,000ft below an Emirates Airbus A380-800 flying from Dubai to Sydney in the opposite direction. The wake turbulence caused by the superjumbo Airbus - the world's largest passenger jet - was so powerful that about one minute after it passed by, G-force sent the Challenger, which was flying at 34,000 feet, into an uncontrolled roll that flipped the aircraft between three and five times. It's important to note that the vortices that cause wake turbulence descend about 1000' before leveling off, and can, in the right conditions, persist for several minutes. This sounds like prime conditions. The description of G-forces causing the loss of control is incorrect. It was the aerodynamic force of the rotating vortices. G-forces, however, were definitely felt by the airplane as it rolled out of control and had to be recovered. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorehambeach 9 #5 May 2, 2017 John. I blame the newspaper that i copied and pasted the article from Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #6 May 3, 2017 shorehambeach John. I blame the newspaper that i copied and pasted the article from I don't doubt you a bit. Anyone who spends any time in aviation soon learns most journalists know little about aviation . . . or science . . . or just about anything useful. . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites