0
brettpobastad

How high should our Turbine 207 go?

Recommended Posts

Quote

A turbine 207? Do you mean a turbo 207?



Naw, there's a conversion for 207s for a small turbine engine. There's a couple of them floating around the US at various DZs as well.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> How high should our Turbine 207 go?

All other things being equal? 13,500 (i.e. 14,000 MSL.) That seems to be the most reasonable compromise between hypoxia and freefall time. Of course that doesn't take into account cycle time, fuel cost, number of tandems etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The DZ is 375 feet above the ocean. The Turbine 207 burns jet fuel and carries a load of 7 jumpers plus pilot to 13k in 18 1/2 minutes



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Was that 18 minutes to 13k, or 18 minutes total time?

Deciding jump altitude depends upon rate of climb and service ceiling. For example, since a Cessna 172 does not want to climb above 5,000' on a hot summer day, there is not point in trying to go any higher. And the best you will get on a cold day is not much above 7,500', so quit wasting your time and jump out.
On the other hand, Cessna 182s get sluggish above 8,500' so you lose money if you sell jump tickets for anything above 10,000.'
Now I understand that small Rolls Royce turbines get sluggish above 10,000' so that may be your limiting altitude.
Not much point to competing with a vastly different airplane (i.e King Air which will cheerfully climb to hypoxic flight levels) if you lose money.
In other words, just because an altitude is fashionable at the "big DZs down south" does not mean that you have to compete directly with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RR

I didn't intend for this to turn into a disscusion on maketing and competing drobzones. Even if we had the exact same jump planes as the bigger area DZ's we still coudn't compete directly with them because we don't have any bathrooms! But the big boys don't have our attitude or our miles and miles of open fields or our great nieghbors, etc. Shoobi Knutson told me a long time ago at a Halloween boogie we were were having (we had a Porter) that if we could just get a turbine of some kind on a regular basis that the jumpers from xxx and xxx would flock to our DZ (OK, fuck it...it's Toledo) because of the good times and the location, and the naked chicks etc.

The point he was making. The point I'm making here is that there is an invisible line so to speak, that jumpers subconciously use to choose where to jump. This turbine 207 puts us just on the good side of that line. We are seeing a slow but steady trickle of curious jumpers from other DZ's trickle in. Only to find out that...."Whaaat!? It only goes to 11,5?? For 21 bucks!? Our turbine goes to 13,5 and we got bathrooms!"

There's more to it than that, of course, so don't waste your time in explaining things I already know. I'm just trying to get our DZO to use the 207 more effeciently and he's not doing that.
"It's only arrogance if you can't back it up"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I miss Gonzo! I used to fly that plane for WPS. I've got 300+ hours in it. For those that are still confused it is a Soloy conversion 207. It has an Allison/Rolls Royce 250 engine. 385 hp max continious/420 takeoff. Excellent short field performance, decent is like any other turbine, FAST! and its jungle gym out side with all kinds of rails and steps.


In Spokane, with a field elevation of 2500 ft, we would climb to 14000 msl/11.500 AGL. When I flew it in Texas on contract, the field was about 500 ft and we climbed to 13000 MSLish as I recall.

I would recommend 12000 agl as a good compromise between climb performance/economics and attracting jumpers.

But it’s been more than 2 years since I flew that plane so my memory may be fuzzy.

Take good care of gonzo, I hope to come jump from it someday now that I’m a jumper too.

Ben

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

we take a 182 up to 14000 feet so why not take the 207 to 13500

Do you pack a lunch or do they have meal service on that flight?:D

:D:D:D:D
It only takes about 30 mins:P
You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky)
My Life ROCKS!
How's yours doing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The DZ is 375 feet above the ocean. The Tubine 207 burns jet fuel and carries a load of 7 jumpers plus pilot to 13k in 18 1/2 minutes



My DZ has a 206 with the same engine. It goes to 13000 ft in 15 minutes with 6 skydivers, so your 18.5 minutes sound about right. Going to less than 13000 ft is silly for a turbine Cessna.
We have been in 20000 ft with ours, and it took 25-30 minutes.

Jacques

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0