0
skybytch

"Partner protection" @ '09 USPA Nationals

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

I have been told I can't fly my company windblade on a DZ where I was doing significant amounts of volunteer work for the DZ during a competition. On more than one occasion. We were told that the windblade space is like "floor space" and that we'd have to pay money to display our logo.
It's not new, but it's the first time I've seen it in print.



You mean like a Sundance Media Group or VAAST windblade? If so, are you going to volunteer again?



I did volunteer again, but likely won't volunteer again.
At the 2008 Nationals, Mark Kirschenbaum and I spent a lot of time devising a system through wihich;
-Captured all competition content, regardless of format, resolution, or camera (except for one very old DV cam that had a problematic firewire port).

-Transferred simultaneously to OmniSkore

-Backed up the data so when OmniSkore or the DVD burners failed (as they did numerous times) the video flyer didn't need to come back and recapture, we simply recalled the data

-Archived all the media for USPA so that any jump at any time could be reviewed, or used for creating a DVD of jumps (I still feel USPA could generate a small revenue stream by releasing a DVD of winning team jumps)

-Provided instant access and output to the news media. Ed Scott came to me on multiple occasions asking for content to go to Good Morning America, etc. It took minutes to generate blanked media for broadcast, and despite the miserable web connection in Eloy, we uploaded nearly 1TB of broadcast content seen on ESPN, CNN, GMA, etc.

-Overall generated a significantly more efficient transfer of media whether it was PAL, NTSC, HD in all its flavors, and even a horrible little MPEG4 (similar to a GoPro) making it so competitors didn't have to give a second's thought to what cameras they were using.

Total cost to USPA and/or Skydive Arizona=Zero.
Sponsored by Hypoxic and VASST.

As far as where the windblades were denied, it doesn't matter where or when. Suffice it to say that there have been two events at two DZs where I was not permitted to fly a windblade because my company wasn't a sponsor.

I see the *reason* for folks being up in arms, but don't see entirely how it negatively affects anyone, other than being able to hand out lit, swag, etc if their sponsors aren't part of the national sponsorship. I sorta doubt it'll have much, if any, impact on the Nationals at all, although this probably should have been brought to competitors attention earlier on.

I don't know about other sponsored jumpers. I'm sponsored by a few companies, and it's not in my sponsorship agreement that I have to do anything other than "promote the image of the related product." None of my sponsors require I fly their flag, hand out lit, swag, etc. I'm also not a competitor, so it may well be different.
What I'd like to know, is if indeed a team can't put up their packing tent with their team/sponsor logos on it, what is being provided in its stead, if anything?

I wrote to my RD asking this question, haven't heard back.
I think it unreasonable for a team to not be able to use their normal packing quarters regardless of what's screened on its side, simply because it's part of the team identity. Flying windblades...a little different. Handing out swag, definitely different.

A slight shift on the same story;
Go to any trade event or sporting event and set up shop handing out your swag; you'll be removed from the premises even if you're a competitor or member of the trade guild. PIA was the same way; they had people walking the floor to make certain no one was selling/demonstrating their product/wares without being a PIA member. Granted, it's slightly different, but in fact, this practice of protecting sponsors, memberships, etc is nothing new; it's just new to this event.

Since BBarnhouse is commenting on this thread;
What would occur should I show up at Eloy with my VASST or FlockUniversity banner and put it up during say...the holiday boogie? Perhaps there was a wingsuit event and a lot of Flock University people were there, or VASST sponsored a breakfast for three days...would our windblade be allowed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have been told I can't fly my company windblade on a DZ where I was doing significant amounts of volunteer work for the DZ during a competition. On more than one occasion. We were told that the windblade space is like "floor space" and that we'd have to pay money to display our logo.



Jeez, that kinda blows. With all that volunteer work you're doing, you are paying them - you're just paying them "in kind" rather than in cash. Short-sighted of them, IMO. I guess love means never having to say "thank you." Not too much, at least. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

As far as where the windblades were denied, it doesn't matter where or when. Suffice it to say that there have been two events at two DZs where I was not permitted to fly a windblade because my company wasn't a sponsor.



It does matter. There is a huge difference between a private boogie or a private function than that of the USPA National Skydiving Competition. Huge difference. If this were a private Spaceland function or boogie I don't think we would all be having this conversation.

Quote

Since BBarnhouse is commenting on this thread;
What would occur should I show up at Eloy with my VASST or FlockUniversity banner and put it up during say...the holiday boogie? Perhaps there was a wingsuit event and a lot of Flock University people were there, or VASST sponsored a breakfast for three days...would our windblade be allowed?



Same thing-- HUGE HUGE HUGE difference. You are comparing a private function to the USPA Nationals. Keep apples with apples and oranges with oranges if you are going to reach for those comparisons.
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't think any of the USPA canopy piloting events require a pond



Yes, they do. Albert holds "ground" meets in Florida, or has in the past. In the swoop comps I organize in Texas, I refuse to organize a ground meet.

http://www.uspa.org/Portals/0/Downloads/Man_SCM_2009.pdf



So to all of these people that said they supposedly contacted their RD and/or the DZ, what did they say? Surely by now a response would have been given.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Since BBarnhouse is commenting on this thread;
What would occur should I show up at Eloy with my VASST or FlockUniversity banner and put it up during say...the holiday boogie? Perhaps there was a wingsuit event and a lot of Flock University people were there, or VASST sponsored a breakfast for three days...would our windblade be allowed?



Same thing-- HUGE HUGE HUGE difference. You are comparing a private function to the USPA Nationals. Keep apples with apples and oranges with oranges if you are going to reach for those comparisons.



OK, change up the parameters.
(hypothetical)
Say I walked on to SDA during Nationals last year and wanted to put up windblades. I volunteered for four days of the event and spent several hours before the event.
I want to put up a windblade, but didn't ask in advance. I'm volunteering for what effectively worked out for the whole event, including several thousand dollars in gear.

Should I be permitted to put up a windblade on SDU's property?

Keep in mind, I'm not a competitor, but I've put every bit as much time and money into this event as most competitors, certainly as much as any pickup team does/did.
I am entirely positive I could not.
Again, I understand people being upset/angry/bothered by the new position of USPA/Spaceland, as it doesn't seem to have been communicated very well (if at all, prior to the announcement of Nationals). But...in the world in which I work, this sort of thing is entirely common. Minor differences, but the size of the events are similar, memberships are similar, etc.

I'd like to better understand where the actual tort lies vs what people *think* is wrong. Is there actually a stipulation in a sponsorship contract that says "Sponsored jumper will perform XXXX at events" vs merely using, displaying, and talking about their gear in public settings? If so, I can see where there might be some interference issues. Otherwise, I'm not quite understanding the actual vs virtual problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Since BBarnhouse is commenting on this thread;
What would occur should I show up at Eloy with my VASST or FlockUniversity banner and put it up during say...the holiday boogie? Perhaps there was a wingsuit event and a lot of Flock University people were there, or VASST sponsored a breakfast for three days...would our windblade be allowed?



Same thing-- HUGE HUGE HUGE difference. You are comparing a private function to the USPA Nationals. Keep apples with apples and oranges with oranges if you are going to reach for those comparisons.



OK, change up the parameters.
(hypothetical)
Say I walked on to SDA during Nationals last year and wanted to put up windblades. I volunteered for four days of the event and spent several hours before the event.
I want to put up a windblade, but didn't ask in advance. I'm volunteering for what effectively worked out for the whole event, including several thousand dollars in gear.

Should I be permitted to put up a windblade on SDU's property?

Keep in mind, I'm not a competitor, but I've put every bit as much time and money into this event as most competitors, certainly as much as any pickup team does/did.
I am entirely positive I could not.
Again, I understand people being upset/angry/bothered by the new position of USPA/Spaceland, as it doesn't seem to have been communicated very well (if at all, prior to the announcement of Nationals). But...in the world in which I work, this sort of thing is entirely common. Minor differences, but the size of the events are similar, memberships are similar, etc.

I'd like to better understand where the actual tort lies vs what people *think* is wrong. Is there actually a stipulation in a sponsorship contract that says "Sponsored jumper will perform XXXX at events" vs merely using, displaying, and talking about their gear in public settings? If so, I can see where there might be some interference issues. Otherwise, I'm not quite understanding the actual vs virtual problem?



Do I think you should have been able to put up your banner at your video station that was helping out the national competition? Yes, I sure do. Do they have to let you? Probably not and it's only going to effect you, but to put a blanket rule out there that could possibly effect you and every competitor that could possibly stop them from competing if their sponsors pull out (and they were their primary or only form of funding for the competition.) because of this new rule (I don't think that will really happen a lot across the board, but it might which is why it needs to be talked about.).

You can choose to not volunteer your time next year at the nationals if they won't let you post your banner or windblade at your video station, but these competitors can not just choose to go to nationals without a sponsor if this new rule is going to keep sponsors from sponsoring them (possibly.. like I said, this might not be true for majority.) This is not their choice. Either they have funding/sponsors, or they don't compete. You either choose to volunteer your time or you don't. It's not a matter of competition for you.

BTW about the whole volunteer thing, regardless of where the windblade thing happened to you, if I owned a DZ and you were helping me out with my boogie or competition by volunteering your time or talents, I would at least have offered you the luxury of displaying your logo somewhere or handing out business cards. FWIW, I think they should have at least done that in thanks, but like I said, that is another topic not quite similar to this one.
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Putting up your windblade next to "sponsor" wind blades might not fly. Putting up your wind blade on the grass next to the packing tent your brought with you and set up in an approved area to "mark your territory" is something different.

The DZ can make any rules they want. I'd just hope that USPA wouldn't choose to host nationals at a DZ that won't let a team put up their own shade tent provided to them by their sponsor because the sponsor didn't pay a fee.

Setting up an unauthorized booth at a trade show is something different. Displaying the name of your sponsor, which is probably in your team name, on your shade tent is not in the same league.

Got my GetHypoxic sticker while in the video line at nationals... Isn't it silly that handing out stickers won't be allowed at this year's nationals?

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Putting up your windblade next to "sponsor" wind blades might not fly. Putting up your wind blade on the grass next to the packing tent your brought with you and set up in an approved area to "mark your territory" is something different.



Exactly what I've been trying to say.

Quote

The DZ can make any rules they want. I'd just hope that USPA wouldn't choose to host nationals at a DZ that won't let a team put up their own shade tent provided to them by their sponsor because the sponsor didn't pay a fee.



I hope so too.

Quote

Setting up an unauthorized booth at a trade show is something different. Displaying the name of your sponsor, which is probably in your team name, on your shade tent is not in the same league.



Exactly what I've been trying to say.

Quote

Got my GetHypoxic sticker while in the video line at nationals... Isn't it silly that handing out stickers won't be allowed at this year's nationals?



Yes!!!
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


-Transferred simultaneously to OmniSkore

-Backed up the data so when OmniSkore or the DVD burners failed (as they did numerous times) the video flyer didn't need to come back and recapture, we simply recalled the data

-Archived all the media for USPA so that any jump at any time could be reviewed, or used for creating a DVD of jumps (I still feel USPA could generate a small revenue stream by releasing a DVD of winning team jumps)



FYI
Omniskore has never been in the stream of capturing or recording videos directly from photographers. That part of the process has always been with the host. I've worked both sides of that equation and know who does what.

Tamara Koyn publishes dvds of each nationals of the jumps per discipline.

.
.
Make It Happen
Parachute History
DiveMaker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So he doesn't want a DZ to take steps to break even or make a profit while holding nationals



All things being equal, I'm sure everybody would want the DZ to turn a fantastic profit off of the event, but in the end that's the DZOs business, not mine.

When you have to limit the competitors to make it work, all things ar no longer equal. In comparison to previous years, the competitors are at a disadvanatge because the DZ wanted an advantage. It's not hard to understand why people would be upset about that concpet.

If you bid on Nationals, you're saying that you can run the meet to the standards of the USPA for a certain dollar figure. If you want to increase your margins (and decreasing your expected loss is the same as increasing your margins) then build a better mousetrap, and find a way to host Nationals while spending less.

They have not built a better mousetrap, they've skewed the playing field in their favor and they will benefit from it. It's not the accepted practice, it's not in the spirit of a competition held by a membership driven (and funded) organization for the sole participation of it's members, and it's just wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

but in the end that's the DZOs business, not mine.

Quote


Your best statement yet.

Quote

When you have to limit the competitors to make it work, all things ar no longer equal. In comparison to previous years, the competitors are at a disadvanatge because the DZ wanted an advantage. It's not hard to understand why people would be upset about that concpet.



How are the competitors at a disadvantage? Do wind blades make them better fliers, does having a custom packing tent compared to a plain colored tent up their averages? I don't think so. Last I heard Nationals was about skydiving not who has the coolest windblades or stickers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How are the competitors at a disadvantage? Do wind blades make them better fliers, does having a custom packing tent compared to a plain colored tent up their averages? I don't think so. Last I heard Nationals was about skydiving not who has the coolest windblades or stickers.



Wow... way to spin that away from the entire conversation that has been going on in this thread. Where did anybody say that not having these things are going to hurt the competitors physical flying talents? Not one person said anything even close to that, but thanks for trying.

You can reread my posts above as to how this can hurt competitors and possibly keep them from competing. If you think what I said is not true, then maybe you'd like to be the representative from spaceland to come on here and outline specifically what is and what isn't allowed. For example, if I am a competitor with a sponsor that funded me for nationals with the intent (and possibly a written contract) that I was going to at least have their logo on my team packing tent, then tell me what I am supposed to do in this situation where my sponsor says, "oh, you can't show our logo like we agreed, so I would like all of my money back that I put in towards your training and I am not funding anything further for the actual competition itself." We can get into a side debate on weather that sponsor is being a little harsh,but it doesn't quite matter because this situation is very possible since the sponsor has this right to fund or not fund or to sponsor and not sponsor if their athlete can not wear or use their logo as outlined in their agreement.
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did not get off topic. He said it gives competitors a disadvantage to not be able to put up there sponsors tent or wind blade (which is what we have been talking about). My point was that not having your tent or windblades will not effect the competition, which is what Nationals is all about, Competing.

See all you haters later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


FYI
Omniskore has never been in the stream of capturing or recording videos directly from photographers. That part of the process has always been with the host. I've worked both sides of that equation and know who does what.

Tamara Koyn publishes dvds of each nationals of the jumps per discipline.

.



Be that as it may, who is responsible for capture/transfer doesn't alter nor affect the amount of effort put in nor the success of the ingest process during Nationals last year. I've never been part of Nationals before, but heard from many people that the ingest of video went more smoothly in 08' than ever before.

That goes without mentioning the videos assembled for the winning teams, video edited and uploaded to national broadcasters, and other special requests by USPA. All without expectation of remuneration or compensation. A "thank you" goes a long way.

A tremendous amount of volunteer effort occurs at competitions, and to a great degree it seems that volunteerism is a discouraged thing.

For some, this may be a reason to not support Nationals, even tho the practice of restricting advertising is very, very common at any sort of competitive event. It wasn't so long ago that an event occurred that Apple sponsored where only Apple computers were allowed in the main area where cameras were set up, and a lot of people complained because they were PC users (pre-bootcamp days) The outcome of that event was that the next year, Apple was not asked back as a sponsor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How are the competitors at a disadvantage? Do wind blades make them better fliers, does having a custom packing tent compared to a plain colored tent up their averages? I don't think so. Last I heard Nationals was about skydiving not who has the coolest windblades or stickers.



Bringing a team to Nationals is not cheap. The return you can expect on your investment when you send yourself to Nationals is having a good time, and developing yourself as a skydiver. Both of which are great things, neither of which pays the bills. As such, many jumpers rely on sponsorship to offset some of the costs, making it within their budgets to train, travel and compete.

When you limit their ability to attract sponsorship, you limit their ability to train, travel and compete.

Would you agree that a jumper with 50 team jumps is at a disadvantage to the jumper with 100 team jumps? That's what happens when the DZO pulls your team rate, you end up with fewer jumps, and that takes points off the board.

So if you spend your money on training, and can't afford the travel or lodging, you're not there - you're not scoring points.

Of course if you train and travel, but cannot afford the resistration or competition jumps, again, it's zeros across the board.

You have to remember that nobody competing at Nationals is a paid athlete. They are all digging into their own pockets in one way or another to be there. Getting a few sponsorship dollars can often make the difference between going, or just reading about it in the magazine.

And really, most jumpers going to Nationals are spending 100% of they can to be there. If they can afford $3000 to train, travel and compete, and they get a deal from the DZ that saves them $500 on training jumps, they're not going to reduce their investment by $500, they'll just crank out another $500 worth of jumps.

It's a shitty thing to do, limiting what little offset they can get, to improve the bottom line of the DZ. The same DZ that bid for Nationals, and said we can do it for 'X', is now trying to do for 'X' minus the cost of these exclusive advertising dollars. You bid for it, you got what you wanted, now deal with what you have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

RiggerPaul basically stated that in one of his posts:

Quote

If Spaceland is trying to make a profit from it, I don't think that's a good thing. If Spaceland excludes a competitor in the name of even breaking even, I don't think they should have that right.



So he doesn't want a DZ to take steps to break even or make a profit while holding nationals.

Competitors shouldn't be excluded, but a DZ should be able to try to at least break even. Then again, SD Arizona is excluding a complete competition from nationals since they don't want to spend the money to build a competition pond. Excluding competitors to save money...



I already modified my statement in another post, but since the issue of what I said came up again, I want to be clear.

Of course it is great if a host dz can break even, and even better if it can make a profit.

But excluding one competitor in the process to achieve that is defeating the purpose of the USPA Nationals.

The Nationals are supposed to be a place where any member can have the opportunity to show us their stuff.

If the host dz has to make deals that might jeopardize the ability of a competitor to participate, I have a problem with that.

In the original quote, I meant for both statements to be tied to the problem of competitor exclusion.

I know, that's not what I said, and I got called on it, as I should have been.

So I want to be clearer now. The problem I have is excluding any competitor in the name of profitability.

In my mind, the competitors have top priority. All other concerns are secondary. If the competitors need the sponsorships to be able to be there, then jeopardizing the competitors' sponsorships, either now or next year, is a bad thing.

If a dz can't agree to that, we should have known during the dz selection process, since it might have affected the selection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

How are the competitors at a disadvantage? Do wind blades make them better fliers, does having a custom packing tent compared to a plain colored tent up their averages? I don't think so. Last I heard Nationals was about skydiving not who has the coolest windblades or stickers.



Bringing a team to Nationals is not cheap. The return you can expect on your investment when you send yourself to Nationals is having a good time, and developing yourself as a skydiver. Both of which are great things, neither of which pays the bills. As such, many jumpers rely on sponsorship to offset some of the costs, making it within their budgets to train, travel and compete.

When you limit their ability to attract sponsorship, you limit their ability to train, travel and compete.

Would you agree that a jumper with 50 team jumps is at a disadvantage to the jumper with 100 team jumps? That's what happens when the DZO pulls your team rate, you end up with fewer jumps, and that takes points off the board.

So if you spend your money on training, and can't afford the travel or lodging, you're not there - you're not scoring points.

Of course if you train and travel, but cannot afford the resistration or competition jumps, again, it's zeros across the board.

You have to remember that nobody competing at Nationals is a paid athlete. They are all digging into their own pockets in one way or another to be there. Getting a few sponsorship dollars can often make the difference between going, or just reading about it in the magazine.

And really, most jumpers going to Nationals are spending 100% of they can to be there. If they can afford $3000 to train, travel and compete, and they get a deal from the DZ that saves them $500 on training jumps, they're not going to reduce their investment by $500, they'll just crank out another $500 worth of jumps.

It's a shitty thing to do, limiting what little offset they can get, to improve the bottom line of the DZ. The same DZ that bid for Nationals, and said we can do it for 'X', is now trying to do for 'X' minus the cost of these exclusive advertising dollars. You bid for it, you got what you wanted, now deal with what you have.



Thank you, thank you, thank you!! VERY well said. Everything I have been trying to put together into words but I feel like it hasn't come across as clear as your post. This is exactly what I am getting at. That said, I feel like a very valid point is out there.

The BOD met today on the issue and is trying to figure out what to do. Hopefully they can get involved and make just like every other nationals competition has been in the past and everybody can just come, have friendly competition and a kick ass experience.

For people who have not called your RD yet, please do it tomorrow and voice your opinion one way or other other. Let them bring it to the table if this is being talked about right now.
Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I fail to see how this is limiting competitors.

"Sorry, dude, we can't sponsor you any more; we can't afford to be one of the official sponsors."

Of course, if you can afford to compete at a high level without sponsorship, or are good enough to get one of the big names to sponsor you, good for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

+1

The company's that pay to be and advertise there deserve to get the most bang for there buck! I see nothing wrong with the way they set it up. If the other company's dont like it then maybe they should pay to be there;)



So the companies that paid for team travel, helped put them up, helped pay for training etc. BUT didn't pay the DZ haven't paid to be there? Or deserve some recognition and advertising? Seems like a DZ money grab to me - plain and simple. But then again, I am plain and simple so what do I know. :S
Scars remind us that the past is real

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Point of clarification: The Golden Knights are not sponsored by the Army, they ARE the Army. They are an Army unit just like the Army Marksmanship Unit, just like the 126th field mess kit battalion, etc.
"It's just skydiving..additional drama is not required"
Some people dream about flying, I live my dream
SKYMONKEY PUBLISHING

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(disclaimer i haven't read all 5 pages and i posted this on blue skies mag thread as well)

It's disheartening to read something like this. I work in PR, Marketing and Sponsorship development for main stream companies. In their eyes USPA national is the 'high profile' event of the year for skydiving, World level is icing on the cake. At a time in our sport when main stream sponsors are opening up to the idea of supporting our professional athletes USPA should be working to expand and promote this interest, not squish it. Look at the interest and projects just over the summer, Revolution tea, Verizon's skydiver themed launch in San Fran, RockBand's official launch video to name just a few. These are major players with major dollars who should be encouraged to put money into our sport.


Not to mention skydiving specific vendors. Say you have a decent suit, not even thinking of a new one, but after nationals you buy a new suit because you spoke with a vendor. You are adding money to our 'skydiving economy' growing that company and allowing them to slowing expand and produce better products at a lower cost. By sponsoring teams you are growing the competition culture and in exchange growing your company. Any company who sponsors anyone works with this mentality.

I understand official vendors having booth space and certain exclusive rights. But to shut out logos on personal space and athlete promotion is unheard of in professional sports. Ever notice how in say skateboarding, at Rockstar sponsored events when a Monster riders is out you see his signs and banners? His trailers have logos? We are shutting out growth and progress of all for the pockets of a few.
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all who wander are lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Point of clarification: The Golden Knights are not sponsored by the Army, they ARE the Army. They are an Army unit just like the Army Marksmanship Unit, just like the 126th field mess kit battalion, etc.



And the PD swoop team is PD. They are employed by them. Just like the sewers, just like the phone sales rep.

See, its not that simple ;-)
Remster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0