ParaHog 0 #1 August 17, 2012 Winsted terminates contract with Westside Skydivers Due to violations of contract in regards to hours of operation, the Westside Skydivers business contract with the city of Winsted was terminated at Tuesday’s Winsted City Council meeting. The contract violation was brought to light through a written complaint from Winsted Airport Commission Member Glenn Weibel, which documented instances of skydiving activities taking place after approved hours. The agreement between the city and Johnson stated “no skydiving activities shall take place until 30 minutes after sunrise or 30 minutes before sunset.” http://www.herald-journal.com/archives/2012/stories/winsted-westside-skydivers.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dqpacker 7 #2 August 18, 2012 man running a dz must be tuff. lol btw anyone know where i can make a sunset jump in MN? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #3 August 18, 2012 How they gonna qualify people for D-licenses with night jumps if they can't make night jumps? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dqpacker 7 #4 August 18, 2012 go to another dz. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #5 August 18, 2012 QuoteThe agreement between the city and Johnson stated “no skydiving activities shall take place until 30 minutes after sunrise or 30 minutes before sunset.” Well, I hate to ask, but did they bust the time limit? Did they sign the agreement and then not stick to it? If that's the case, I think the title of the thread should be reversed to read that the city is the one having a problem with the DZ, that being that they violated their contract. That said, I don't agree with that type of clause in the contract, I think it puts and undue limitation on the business, but if the DZO signed, then he signed. Does anyone know the nature of the violation? Was it loads taking off within 30 min of sunset, or was it jumpers/aircraft landing 28 min before sunset, and the airport is just out to get them? Furthermore, does anyone know the motivation for that clause? Is it a safety thing? Surely they don't ban all aviation activites during those times, so they can't call it a noise abatement issue, so all I can guess is that they don't want canopies in the air near dark, no? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ufk22 32 #6 August 18, 2012 Sounds like just another pissing contest, GA pilots that don't like the fact that someone else is really using "their" airport. Then make up a bunch of restrictive rules. What do you suppose would happen if the airport board decided that no aircraft could operate outside of those same restrictions? I would guess that Skydive op's are 90+ percent of the airports total traffic, maybe 95+% of TO and landings. When they get an airport board smart enough to realize what those additional numbers mean for federal funding for improvements, things will probably improve. Pretty common.This is the paradox of skydiving. We do something very dangerous, expose ourselves to a totally unnecesary risk, and then spend our time trying to make it safer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 558 #7 August 18, 2012 "Quote... The agreement between the city and Johnson stated “no skydiving activities shall take place until 30 minutes after sunrise or 30 minutes before sunset.” ..." ...................................................................... Four comments on those time constraints. First, the only place I have seen hung-over skydivers drag their @$$$$$$ out of bed for pre-dawn jumps was California City. Hah! Hah! Secondly, those hours differ from FARs regarding day VFR, which state that legal daylight ends 30 minutes after sunset. Sunset is defined as when the center of the sun is at the horizon. That might give skydivers' lawyers a chance to claim discrimination between different groups of aviators. Thirdly, dropping skydivers AT sunset vastly increase the risk of students wandering off into the forest or cutaway canopies disapearring. Read: negligent or expensive. Fourthly, skydivers knew the limts in the contract and exceeded those limits. No sympathy! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SEREJumper 1 #8 August 19, 2012 QuoteFourthly, skydivers knew the limts in the contract and exceeded those limits. No sympathy! Should have said unless you have other information...Fourthly, skydivers knew the limts in the contract and IF THEY exceeded those limits. No sympathy!We're not fucking flying airplanes are we, no we're flying a glorified kite with no power and it should be flown like one! - Stratostar Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stratostar 5 #9 February 24, 2013 They are still having problems up there with locals/government. http://www.herald-journal.com/archives/2013/stories/skydivers-hollywood.htmlyou can't pay for kids schoolin' with love of skydiving! ~ Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
