0
JohnRich

Bail out, or land with the plane?

Recommended Posts

Quote

I agree, but John Rich seems to be advocating exiting the plane right away in the scenario described with out waiting for any input from the pilot. The scenario he described has plenty of time to wait for pilot instructions. It's not at a critical altitude and there is no structural failure that is causing the plane to descend quickly and uncontrollably.

In that scenario it is highly unlikely that the pilot is not going to relay instructions with in a reasonable time frame.



The pilot only needs two words to empty the plane...but the jumpers should be ready at any time....At 2 to 3 grand the jumpers need to take the decision themselves....its only sensible....

The problem here is its only a one scenario situation...and the discussion has to be balanced, in case people get the idea that one course of action is the only one.....when every situation is different and different people and aircraft are involved.

When things turn to shit it, can happen fast and quickly multiply till its a matter of survival, every situation (and its solution) can be different.....Had to bail once when the cockpit suddenly filled with smoke and an incredible stink of burning plastic...electrical fire...We didn't hang around waiting for something to blow.......

Over the water, we were dead men if we bailed, and riding the plane into the sea wasn't a lifesaving option either......all options were bad...

Personally, plane problems at altitude don't bother me too much....its takeoff problems that scare me....
My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Right, I agree.

What I wrote only pertained to the specified scenario.



If you're gonna be in one, thats a pretty good one for it to be...but you'd be pretty lucky to get away with a relatively easy one to deal with like that....

A variety of options and reactions need to be in everyones portfolio for survival....
My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah well I was with you on one, and a nice calm voice in the back helped :P what got me was the number of people that went straight there reserve from no lower than 1,700 feet. (and I think higher)

When I ask one why they had selected to go straight to there reserve from that altitude I was told straight faced with total belief "Because reserves never fail"

Holy cow........

Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Followed instructions and as far as I know I am still alive at least till someone tells me differently.Wink



What with surviving the rapture the other day, all your cards are coming up trumps!!.
B|
My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I agree with this statement. What I don't agree with is that the situation you described and the what happened in the MI incident qualifies as an extreme situation that requires quick thinking and action. And I can say that because I have been in that situation and there was plenty of time to wait and see what the pilot wanted us to do. No need to panic and rush for the door as you seem to be advocating.



You have misinterpreted my "advocacy", and I'm tired of explaining myself over and over again...

Quote

I agree, but John Rich seems to be advocating exiting the plane right away in the scenario described with out waiting for any input from the pilot. The scenario he described has plenty of time to wait for pilot instructions. It's not at a critical altitude and there is no structural failure that is causing the plane to descend quickly and uncontrollably.



Note that in my scenario everyone sat tight awaiting word from the pilot, and only when the plane has descended to a hard-deck altitude with no word from the PIC, do I then suggest that people make their own go/no-go decision. I don't know how you are deriving these misinterpretations of my statements...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I agree, but John Rich seems to be advocating exiting the plane right away in the scenario described with out waiting for any input from the pilot. The scenario he described has plenty of time to wait for pilot instructions. It's not at a critical altitude and there is no structural failure that is causing the plane to descend quickly and uncontrollably.



Note that in my scenario everyone sat tight awaiting word from the pilot, and only when the plane has descended to a hard-deck altitude with no word from the PIC, do I then suggest that people make their own go/no-go decision. I don't know how you are deriving these misinterpretations of my statements...



I don't know, but my reading is that people may be suggesting that aircraft emergencies are too complicated a situation with too many variables to be boiled down to a simple yes/no question.
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to admit it's highly unlikely that a pilot would not give instructions during the flight from 9,000 feet to 3,000. That's a lot of time.

I partly getting this from your reaction to the MI incident. It appears that you think it was ok for the people that jumped with out waiting for the pilot to give instructions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't know, but my reading is that people may be suggesting that aircraft emergencies are too complicated a situation with too many variables to be boiled down to a simple yes/no question.



Thats it.....its why I didn't take the option to vote....
My computer beat me at chess, It was no match for me at kickboxing....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I partly getting this from your reaction to the MI incident. It appears that you think it was ok for the people that jumped with out waiting for the pilot to give instructions.



I've already told you twice that you have misrepresented my position. So why are you here, once again, saying the same thing for a third time, after I've already told you twice it's incorrect. ARE YOU HARD OF HEARING? I don't like to yell, but the message isn't getting through to you for some reason.

I'll quote here a crucial message I made in the Incidents forum thread on this topic, to try and help you understand my position:
"We've had a large number of our friends die in plane crashes after experiencing engine problems. I think skydivers are far safer bailing out, than staying with the plane, in the vast majority of circumstances. By all means, do it with the pilots permission. But if he's too busy flying the plane to communicate, then what? If you've stayed patiently with a crippled plane, no word from the pilot, and you're down to 3,000 feet - what are you going to do?

'It's a personal judgement call at that point. If the plane is going down to a high-probability bad landing, and the pilot isn't granting permission to exit because he's just too busy to think about it, I'm bailing out anyway. You are welcome to stay onboard and take your chances with landing in the crippled plane. Good luck. Before you turn the flamethrowers on me, review the stories of bad aircraft landings and all the skydivers that have died as a result... "
If that doesn't clear it up for you, then alternatively, I offer you this position:
"If the engine quits, I'm going to immediately bail out, without regard to the commands of the pilot, nor with concern for anyone else on board. Fuck them, I'm saving my own ass. And if you want to live, you better follow me out, fast! I'll be on the ground drinking a cold beer, watching everyone else die in a fiery crash landing. Ha!"
There, does that make you happy now? Apparently you need someone to hate, so that should do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Apparently you need someone to hate, so that should do it for you.



I'm usually enough for most people.
"The ground does not care who you are. It will always be tougher than the human behind the controls."

~ CanuckInUSA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I voted based on the situation as it was presented. Pretty simple I think. Now you can go on about alternatives that should have happened before then but in that scenario they did not. Didn't someone already say they were in an incident where the pilot forgot to relay any instructions as well?


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rap is to music what etch-a-sketch is to art.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It appears that you think it was ok for the people that jumped with out waiting for the pilot to give instructions.



Well, my lengthy reply to this, with a quote from the other thread, was deleted by a moderator.

So I'll just keep it short this time: "You're wrong".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

So from 9.5 to 3 the pilot just glides along and says nothing? Not likely.



Maybe he says something but nobody hears it. Full face helmets! Maybe someone up front hears it, but doesn't pass the word. Maybe the pilot is over-saturated dealing with the situation and has been too busy to think about informing the jumpers on board.



John is this not what training is for?

As you learned in the MARINES there is a chain of command, a procedure etched in stone, a training technique that instills in you they way to do things, the time to do it and why.

I may be a really low timer but I plan on coming back, I have listened to my friends advice for over 30 years.

They are not just experienced jumpers but instructors as well that may have taught many of you here on this very board, if not maybe your instructor was.

I put a lot of credence into what someone says when they have been doing this for so damned long and lived through the days when things were not as well scrutinized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

At what point would you interfere with the pilot while he's dealing with an emergency situation, in order to request permission to bail out?



If the pilot cannot be bothered to answer a question in the time it takes to go from 9.5 to 3k in a stable gliding airplane..... Then he should not be flying.

If I tried to ask the pilot and he ignored me for that long... I'd likely get out... I mean if he is so tasked for that long that he cannot advise the PAX, then I doubt he could handle the dead stick landing.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



One of the scariest loads i have been on was when a twin otter lost an engine. Same scenario the pilot never gave us a go to get out. So all in all we stayed packed in the otter and landed with one engine......scary situation. I myself wanted out , afterwards the pilot said "i guess i coulda let you guys out". And yes it would have made it probably easier on the landing. If i was ever in that situation again, i would ask the pilot and tell him i want out.. Now if both engines were not working i would in no way stick around!!




Scariest I was on was back in the 70's. They brought in a beech for a local boogie, blew a jug not long after take-off and the guy closest to the door just rolled out...I was about 3rd to the door but about 5th out. Didn't have a whole lotta jumps & I remember looking down thinking FUCK we're LOW!

Two little guys wormed right past me...:ph34r:

I had a Jerry Bird belly wart with the Velcro opening flap...I 'think' I remember hearing that Velcro ~s l o w l y~ peeling and the pilot-chute finally shooting out...no doubt felt longer than it took. :D:)

Some people said the exit was 600 feet, but I think we were higher, I was under a 24' flat @ 500, and didn't think to look at my altimeter for bit, until I got my heart beating again. ;)




I was also in a 180 that quit shortly after take-off, I was jump-mastering students and was on my knees by the door, maybe 3-400 feet up...the pilot just looked at me and said STAY, he landed safe, I'm glad because it was 'back in the time' before seatbelts and I was kneeling facing forward with no door on! :S

Plane was down and sick, so the beer light was on early...it wasn't cold yet but, never tasted better! :)


I was in a plane crash with 5 jumpers on board in Nowra, Australia March 6th '94. There was never any talk of trying exit the aircraft. The Cessna 206 engine cut out at 300ft on jump assent and during the attempted landing the plane stalled at 50ft over a grass strip just next to the runway. The plane flipped on it's nose after shearing off the nose gear and ended up on it's back. No deaths but lots of broken bones. Me: Broken right leg, back and crushed C6/C7. I was back jumping after 8 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0