0
nigel99

UK violence

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, tkhayes said:

does any criminal consider jail time?  I doubt it.

The professional ones do. It is part of the cost of business for them. The average criminal is far too stupid to think very far ahead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
11 hours ago, tkhayes said:

does any criminal consider jail time?  I doubt it.

I think we'll see a similar wave of blubbering 'hard men' leaving court after sentencing as you guys did after Jan 6.

But for some more immediate karma, please enjoy this modern art piece entitled "Rioter gets hit in balls with own breezeblock"

 

Edited by jakee
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jakee said:

I think we'll see a similar wave of blubbering 'hard men' leaving court after sentencing as you guys did after Jan 6.

But for some more immediate karma, please enjoy this modern art piece entitled "Rioter gets hit in balls with own breezeblock"

 

That’s brilliant!

Jail is an outdated concept mostly, although it is an easy ‘fix’. There aren’t many deterrents that work - even the death penalty doesn’t really stop people.

But crime deserves punishment or education depending on the type of crime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, nigel99 said:

That’s brilliant!

Jail is an outdated concept mostly, although it is an easy ‘fix’. There aren’t many deterrents that work - even the death penalty doesn’t really stop people.

But crime deserves punishment or education depending on the type of crime.

Many times, jail only protects the general public against that criminal for "X" number of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I want to know is why the most recent band of UK thugs were sentenced a mere WEEK after their crimes, while back in 2010, it took British Columbia courts a YEAR to convict vandals who ransacked downtown Vancouver during the Stanley Cup riots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/14/2024 at 3:03 PM, riggerrob said:

What I want to know is why the most recent band of UK thugs were sentenced a mere WEEK after their crimes, while back in 2010, it took British Columbia courts a YEAR to convict vandals who ransacked downtown Vancouver during the Stanley Cup riots.

Government here trying to send a short sharp message to the vandals which seems to be working. Only those who plead guilty are fast tracked. Otherwise it takes the slow train.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/14/2024 at 4:03 AM, riggerrob said:

What I want to know is why the most recent band of UK thugs were sentenced a mere WEEK after their crimes, while back in 2010, it took British Columbia courts a YEAR to convict vandals who ransacked downtown Vancouver during the Stanley Cup riots.

Rob, this will sting a little but you don't have a clue how the legal system works and that includes lawyers. You had a bad experience but you are not alone and you absolutely are not right to be making the blanket statements that you do. Stick to what you know, rigging and jumping etc., and leave the lawyer bashing thing in your past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Bokdrol said:

Government here trying to send a short sharp message to the vandals

Well, kinda. But compared to the powers the previous government put in place to tackle peaceful protests and other things then sentencing has been quite lenient.

If any pro-Palestinian marchers had conspired to attack police officers en-masse, break into people’s homes, burn cars, public buildings and hotels with people inside then it is a cast iron guarantee they would have been prosecuted under anti-terror laws and be facing decades long sentences, not a few years. Even a group of climate protestors who conspired to hang a flag from a motorway bridge got longer sentences than the members of these violent criminal gangs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jakee said:

Well, kinda. But compared to the powers the previous government put in place to tackle peaceful protests and other things then sentencing has been quite lenient.

If any pro-Palestinian marchers had conspired to attack police officers en-masse, break into people’s homes, burn cars, public buildings and hotels with people inside then it is a cast iron guarantee they would have been prosecuted under anti-terror laws and be facing decades long sentences, not a few years. Even a group of climate protestors who conspired to hang a flag from a motorway bridge got longer sentences than the members of these violent criminal gangs.

Aren't Brits a violent kinda people to start with? I mean its regular news that football fans are rioting and causing trouble all over Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

Rob, this will sting a little but you don't have a clue how the legal system works and that includes lawyers. You had a bad experience but you are not alone and you absolutely are not right to be making the blanket statements that you do. Stick to what you know, rigging and jumping etc., and leave the lawyer bashing thing in your past.

Joe,

You are correct in stating that I do not understand the Canadian legal system ... but then neither do most Canadian citizens. The Canadian legal system has evolved to the point that it (de jury) no longer resembles the original (de facto) written law. Canadian law is inaccessible to the masses.

Perhaps that is the way that Canadian lawyers prefer it.

But I am a curious person and I continue to ask questions until I understand something.

Today I just mailed two more embarrassing questions to the Law Society of British Columbia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Phil1111 said:

Aren't Brits a violent kinda people to start with? I mean its regular news that football fans are rioting and causing trouble all over Europe.

Your news is about 20 years out of date. A combination of criminal justice action and the FA heavily sanctioning clubs who failed to ban violent and racist fans has largely dismantled the old British football hooliganism scene.

These days British fans are far more likely to be the victims of organised violence from clubs who still seem to value their groups of ‘ultras’. Notably in Italy and across Eastern Europe, but local gangs and incompetent policing heavily targeted Liverpool fans in last year’s Champions League final in Paris, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Phil1111 said:

Aren't Brits a violent kinda people to start with? I mean its regular news that football fans are rioting and causing trouble all over Europe.

Those are the lower class Brits. The upper class Brits are nothing like them and will tell you how these lower class Brits are not real Brits.

Who cares what the plebs do to each other anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, riggerrob said:

The Canadian legal system has evolved to the point that it (de jury) no longer resembles the original (de facto) written law. Canadian law is inaccessible to the masses.

I don't think you understand de jurand de facto.

Considering we have a common law system it is by definition not as "original written law."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

Those are the lower class Brits. The upper class Brits are nothing like them and will tell you how these lower class Brits are not real Brits.

Who cares what the plebs do to each other anyways.

The old line is that rugby is a sport for yobs played by gentlemen and football is a sport for gentlemen played by yobs.

Just FYI on the violence thing though - your murder rate is approximately double ours. If we don't care about our plebs, you appear to be actively trying to do away with yours ; )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jakee said:

The old line is that rugby is a sport for yobs played by gentlemen and football is a sport for gentlemen played by yobs.

Just FYI on the violence thing though - your murder rate is approximately double ours. If we don't care about our plebs, you appear to be actively trying to do away with yours ; )

Yes, murder is a part of violence. Amazing perception!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, SkyDekker said:

Those are the lower class Brits. The upper class Brits are nothing like them and will tell you how these lower class Brits are not real Brits.

Who cares what the plebs do to each other anyways.

They were real enough for the Somme in 1916, North Africa in 1941, the North Atlantic 1939-45, Normandy in 1944. . . . .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0