kallend 1,822 #126 September 2 He's a troll. You know he's a troll. He knows he's a troll. The Greenies know he's a troll. He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)? 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 283 #127 September 2 5 hours ago, kallend said: who remembers Nippleboy Actually no - and I've been here a long time!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,313 #128 September 2 He was more on rec.skydiving Google his name (and try it without an E also), and if Usenet is still accessible you’ll get some classic entertainment. Note you’ll also get a lot of porn Wendy P. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,731 #129 September 2 6 hours ago, kallend said: He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)? Safety first, fun forever! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,462 #130 September 3 10 hours ago, kallend said: He's a troll. You know he's a troll. He knows he's a troll. The Greenies know he's a troll. He doesn't even have entertainment value (who remembers Nippleboy)? Nipp1eboy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #131 September 3 On 8/31/2024 at 11:26 AM, tkhayes said: NOAA predicted below average for the pacific , maybe 1-4, but they are already at 8 named tropical cyclones. so much for your ability to observe or predict And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olofscience 460 #132 September 3 21 minutes ago, brenthutch said: And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled. Who's "they"? And was the prediction "there would be NO LULLS in activity"? As far as I remember, all I predicted was that you'd start making this thread earlier in the year, which did happen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #133 September 3 6 minutes ago, olofscience said: Who's "they"? And was the prediction "there would be NO LULLS in activity"? “NOAA National Weather Service forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. NOAA’s outlook for the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, which spans from June 1 to November 30, predicts an 85% chance of an above-normal season” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 259 #134 September 3 41 minutes ago, brenthutch said: And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled. you said it was 'falsified'. So is it falsified only in this hemisphere or is falsified for the entire earth, or are you changing the goalposts again to deny that you said what you said, or believe what you believe.... 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,078 #135 September 3 36 minutes ago, tkhayes said: you said it was 'falsified'. So is it falsified only in this hemisphere or is falsified for the entire earth, or are you changing the goalposts again to deny that you said what you said, or believe what you believe.... A combination of changing the goalposts,together with a poor understanding of scientific estimation and theory. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,343 #136 September 3 1 hour ago, brenthutch said: And they predicted a very active season in the Atlantic. It would seem the science is far from settled. Did they predict there would be no times without a storm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #137 September 3 11 minutes ago, jakee said: Did they predict there would be no times without a storm? No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olofscience 460 #138 September 3 35 minutes ago, brenthutch said: No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of) The fact that you couldn't wait for the end of the season to proclaim this shows how insecure you are. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 259 #139 September 3 42 minutes ago, brenthutch said: No but we are 12 days from the peak of hurricane season and so far we are on track for a below average year (something they gave only a 5% chance of) AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,731 #140 September 3 9 minutes ago, tkhayes said: AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you? He will become annoyed by those facts and change the subject. "Hey, it was cold in Nevada last week. Climate change is FALSIFIED!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olofscience 460 #141 September 3 2 hours ago, brenthutch said: “NOAA National Weather Service forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. NOAA’s outlook for the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, which spans from June 1 to November 30, predicts an 85% chance of an above-normal season” Yep, nothing there about having no lulls in hurricane activity. Thanks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,343 #142 September 3 2 hours ago, brenthutch said: No So how does it falsify the theory that higher levels of CO2 would cause more hurricanes? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,731 #143 September 3 3 hours ago, olofscience said: The fact that you couldn't wait for the end of the season to proclaim this shows how insecure you are. And will result in another one of his now-famous failed predictions. But it allows him to say something against global warming, which is the important part. Climate change deniers are often wrong, but they are never in doubt. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #144 September 4 8 hours ago, tkhayes said: AND ONCE AGAIN, the pacific is above average.... what say you? Above average yet well within the range of historical norms, AKA nothingburger. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #145 September 4 6 hours ago, jakee said: So how does it falsify the theory that higher levels of CO2 would cause more hurricanes? Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,564 #146 September 4 3 hours ago, brenthutch said: Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes Who doesn’t like a Feyman lecture repeat, thank you. May I suggest that you not continue with trying 10-20-30? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,343 #147 September 4 3 hours ago, brenthutch said: Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes One day without an active storm doesn’t say anything about whether there’s an increase in hurricanes though, does it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 259 #148 September 4 9 hours ago, brenthutch said: Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes Except for the part where we just 'falsified' your statement - Changes in Hurricanes | National Climate Assessment (globalchange.gov) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olofscience 460 #149 September 4 (edited) 9 hours ago, brenthutch said: Record high CO2 no corresponding increases in hurricanes This is hilarious not only do you not read your own sources, you don't even WATCH the YouTube videos you post! It was getting really annoying how conservatives would post 2-hour long YouTube videos and tell people "tell me what in the video is wrong?" or "this is PROOF!". Oh, and in case you were wondering how I was sure Brent hasn't watched the video - he's watched the first 1 minute at most After the first minute, Feynman starts teaching other things that Brent doesn't follow AT ALL. Edited September 4 by olofscience Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 419 #150 September 4 8 hours ago, jakee said: One day without an active storm doesn’t say anything about whether there’s an increase in hurricanes though, does it? No but a month+ without one during peak season in a year predicted to be very active just might. Don’t you think? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
