Slim King 31 #1 Posted January 4 (edited) If you were to melt the entire north pole's arctic ice (Let's say over a years period or so), the sea levels would all remain exactly the same. (And we'd have a Northwest passage!!!) Follow the Science!!!! Edited January 4 by Slim King Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,252 #2 January 4 (edited) The troll king is on my ignore list, but just looking at the thread title I am amazed he has taken so long to come up with this, when the topic of melting sea ice has been discussed probably a dozen times or more in this forum. It's not exactly a novel discovery. The Greenland and Antarctic ice caps, OTOH........ Edited January 4 by kallend Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 352 #3 January 4 44 minutes ago, kallend said: The troll king is on my ignore list, but just looking at the thread title I am amazed he has taken so long to come up with this, when the topic of melting sea ice has been discussed probably a dozen times or more in this forum. It's not exactly a novel discovery. The Greenland and Antarctic ice caps, OTOH........ Given the average temperature of Antarctic is around -50c, I don’t think there is much of a threat there Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #4 January 4 54 minutes ago, kallend said: The troll king is on my ignore list, but just looking at the thread title I am amazed he has taken so long to come up with this, when the topic of melting sea ice has been discussed probably a dozen times or more in this forum. It's not exactly a novel discovery. The Greenland and Antarctic ice caps, OTOH........ TROLL KING???? rotflmao ... So you agree then? The melting of the entire north polar cap would not raise the sea level a single centimeter? If that is the case why all the disinformation about the rising sea level, since it has nothing to do with the ice cap and isn't happening at abnormal levels? If I'm on your ignore list why would you even answer? LOL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 1,753 #5 January 4 15 minutes ago, Slim King said: The melting of the entire north polar cap would not raise the sea level a single centimeter? If that is the case why all the disinformation about the rising sea level, since it has nothing to do with the ice cap and isn't happening at abnormal levels? If you honestly don't know this, it would be wise to do a little research before sticking your foot in your mouth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #6 January 4 1 minute ago, billvon said: If you honestly don't know this, it would be wise to do a little research before sticking your foot in your mouth. [email protected]@KS like all those "Thinning Polar Ice" revelations were just Propaganda!!!! For all those years .... Like I've always said .. The seas aren't rising .. There is no climate crisis... No one is drowning and the coral reefs are bigger than ever while the polar bear population is at an all time high!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 1,753 #7 January 4 3 minutes ago, Slim King said: [email protected]@KS like all those "Thinning Polar Ice" revelations were just Propaganda!! Reality: (I know you don't like datasets so here's a video you can watch) Quote The seas aren't rising . Picture for you below. Quote the coral reefs are bigger than ever And another picture for you below. Again, I'd advise a little research before you post, so as to keep your foot out of your mouth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #8 January 4 Balderdash!!!!! You are proving my point ... All those thinning ICE VIDEOS were just scare tactics to get you to think that the oceans were rising at a dangerous rate to the point we were all going to die!!!! And the chart is a man made ESTIMATE ... Totally debunked now. Here the real TRUTH!!!! https://rumble.com/v23sjy1-fastest-warming-ever.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 1,622 #9 January 4 Rumble is a source of actual information? Do you use it for medical information as well? How about for legal opinions? Wendy P. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #10 January 4 39 minutes ago, wmw999 said: Rumble is a source of actual information? Do you use it for medical information as well? How about for legal opinions? Wendy P. You could say the same for YouTube or any of them. It's just an informational tool. I'll bet you use WIKI and it's the biggest source of misinformation on the planet...right? The Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, The Epoch Times, Breitbart, and several others have all been around for about 20 years or so. I like them. I do watch a series of Drs. on YouTube to escape the big lies. I'm not a mechanic but YouTube showed me how to fix my car. I hope Elon Musk buys YouTube and exposes their corruption as he did Twitter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 1,753 #11 January 4 52 minutes ago, wmw999 said: Rumble is a source of actual information? Do you use it for medical information as well? Nonsense! They have Tucker Carlson for that. Quote How about for legal opinions? That comes from Truth Social. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 891 #12 January 5 15 hours ago, wmw999 said: Rumble is a source of actual information? Do you use it for medical information as well? How about for legal opinions? This thread has been locked for cross posting. We did this with Rush's 1998 thread for way too long. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,252 #13 January 18 It appears that Greenland is warming faster than previously thought:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05517-z Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #14 March 13 On 1/18/2023 at 12:40 PM, kallend said: It appears that Greenland is warming faster than previously thought:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05517-z You forgot to read this part......."The disproportionate warming is accompanied by enhanced Greenland meltwater run-off, implying that anthropogenic influence has also arrived in central and north Greenland, which might further accelerate the overall Greenland mass loss." Check out the words IMPLYING and MIGHT ... This is an inconclusive study paid for by ??????? You guessed it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 1,753 #15 March 13 29 minutes ago, Slim King said: You forgot to read this part......."The disproportionate warming is accompanied by enhanced Greenland meltwater run-off, implying that anthropogenic influence has also arrived in central and north Greenland, which might further accelerate the overall Greenland mass loss." Kallend said that Greenland is warming faster than previously thought, and that is a fact. From the abstract: "The warming in the recent reconstructed decade exceeds the range of the pre-industrial temperature variability in the past millennium with virtual certainty (P < 0.001) and is on average 1.5 ± 0.4 degrees Celsius (1 standard error) warmer than the twentieth century." Quote This is an inconclusive study paid for by ??????? You guessed it. No need to guess. It's right there in the author's bios. Funny how you claim to know what the article said, but can't even find the place the authors work. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #16 March 13 (edited) OH... I read it ... And I got you to look too!!!!! All funded by the people who profit from the lies..... https://rumble.com/v2cvz11-2506-days-left-for-the-planet.html Greta said we'd all be toast ...ROTFLMAO Edited March 13 by Slim King Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,252 #17 March 13 Troll King appears to be back: but "You've chosen to ignore content by Slim King." 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim King 31 #18 March 14 Greta told my 8 year old son he's never make it to 13 ..... But here he is in 2023 and Daytona Beach was exactly the same as it was 5 years ago!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 330 #19 March 14 On 3/13/2023 at 7:12 AM, kallend said: Troll King appears to be back: but "You've chosen to ignore content by Slim King." Might as well rename the forum from the way it looks todays. The tolerance of trolls reduces the number of active participants. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 1,665 #20 March 14 Just now, normiss said: Might as well rename the forum from the way it looks todays. The tolerance of trolls reduces the number of active participants. If we can't ban him can we at least ban more than one use per month each of ROTFLMAO and LOL! ? While we're at it I'd toss in OMG!, too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 980 #21 March 15 9 hours ago, JoeWeber said: If we can't ban him can we at least ban more than one use per month each of ROTFLMAO and LOL! ? While we're at it I'd toss in OMG!, too. You forgot "[email protected]@K". 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
