1 1
wmw999

Jane Fonda vs Donald Trump

Recommended Posts

I’ve been in old stomping grounds the last week+, and we were talking about shows we watch. I mentioned “Grace and Frankie” (cute, not earth-shattering), and the response was all about the evils of Jane Fonda. That same person has excused Jan 6 as “an expression of free speech.”

Why is it that what Jane Fonda did as a young woman was so very evil that even 50+ years later, with apologies, it casts her off completely, while what Donald Trump did, in bandwagoning on the “ divide and conquer” approach to OUR COUNTRY, is OK?

Wendy P. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wmw999 said:

Why is it that what Jane Fonda did as a young woman was so very evil that even 50+ years later, with apologies, it casts her off completely, while what Donald Trump did, in bandwagoning on the “ divide and conquer” approach to OUR COUNTRY, is OK?

They are on different teams. It's just that simple. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, wmw999 said:

I’ve been in old stomping grounds the last week+, and we were talking about shows we watch. I mentioned “Grace and Frankie” (cute, not earth-shattering), and the response was all about the evils of Jane Fonda. That same person has excused Jan 6 as “an expression of free speech.”

Why is it that what Jane Fonda did as a young woman was so very evil that even 50+ years later, with apologies, it casts her off completely, while what Donald Trump did, in bandwagoning on the “ divide and conquer” approach to OUR COUNTRY, is OK?

Wendy P. 

Hi Wendy,

Pres. Jimmie Carter pardoned all the draft dodgers that went to Canada.

At first, I was sort of irked about his doing this.  Later, I came to accept it.

I see no reason for not doing the same for Jane Fonda,

I mean, who wants to have what they at 17 did in the back seat of their dad's Chevy, hang over their head for the rest of their life?

IMO Jane has more than atoned for what she did.

Jerry Baumchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, wmw999 said:

I’ve been in old stomping grounds the last week+, and we were talking about shows we watch. I mentioned “Grace and Frankie” (cute, not earth-shattering), and the response was all about the evils of Jane Fonda. That same person has excused Jan 6 as “an expression of free speech.”

Why is it that what Jane Fonda did as a young woman was so very evil that even 50+ years later, with apologies, it casts her off completely, while what Donald Trump did, in bandwagoning on the “ divide and conquer” approach to OUR COUNTRY, is OK?

Wendy P. 

My dad served in the Vietnam war, and if Jane Fonda is ever mentioned he loses his shit still to this day.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, tonyhays said:

My dad served in the Vietnam war, and if Jane Fonda is ever mentioned he loses his shit still to this day.  

I am reminded of Ron who feels a similar way.  But when Trump being a draft dodger was brought up, he replied something along the line of "oh, I wasn't all that political back then, so I didn't really care about draft dodgers.  So that's OK."

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jane Fonda is Hollywood, a woman, and disrespected the US Military. An easy target to keep winding people up about.

 

January 6 insurrection participants are patriotic Americans that have been disenfranchised by a rigged election forcing the greatest president in history out of office.

 

it’s different.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, grimmie said:

Jane Fonda is Hollywood, a woman, and disrespected the US Military. An easy target to keep winding people up about.

 

January 6 insurrection participants are patriotic Americans that have been disenfranchised by a rigged election forcing the greatest president in history out of office.

 

it’s different.

Rigged Election? Let me guess. You saw a video and it was so convincing.

Thank God the integrity of our elections is kept in check by courts of law and not by Youtube videos.

At least so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, gowlerk said:

Apparently sarcasm is a risky thing to employ in an online forum. Ask Joe.

Sarcasm is only effective when there is some agreed upon standard of crazy. Otherwise, it's too difficult to distinguish that sarcasm from an intentional argument. Unfortunately, what was once considered off the wall crazy is now the norm and it will only get worse with the developments at Twitter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1