0
Hawkins121

Is there enough training/practice on how to PLF in the average AFF ground course?

Recommended Posts

In many threads I see people mention that they broke their ankle, leg or foot landing. These are usually people with under 60 jumps or so.

9 times out of 10 a PLF can prevent breaking something. You might get up using a string of profanity but you will get up with your bones intact.

During my AFF ground course we spent maybe 10 minutes on the PLF.

Because I am retarded I had more than one occasion where I flared to high or to low and had to PLF. I was lucky because I had been to army airborne school and the PLF is permenantly engraved in muscle memory. Anyway, If I had only used the training I received in my AFF ground course to PLF I would have broken something.

My question is how long did you guys focus on the PLF during your AFF ground training?? Do you think there should be more focus on it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


My question is how long did you guys focus on the PLF during your AFF ground training?? Do you think there should be more focus on it?



Sometime you could spend over an hour or more explaining and doing PLF's on the ground, and the student seem to forget it upon landing.:S
Duct taping their legs together seems to be the only way they do it everytime.....:D:P


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In some cases, the lack of training may indeed be the issue. In my FJC we spent a good half hour on PLFs, and practiced multiple times, even jumping from the stairs we wheel up to the plane, so it was a good four-step drop to practice.

I have a theory, though, that it's not necessarily the lack of training, but often the pride/teasing factor that prevents people from doing PLFs. Lots of people have an idea that a tippy-toe landing is the one and only way to land, and that's reinforced by the teasing, jokes, comments, etc., that you get if you come back with a dirty jumpsuit. Sure, standups are a nice goal, but they're often not the safest answer.

There's a lot of safe decisions in this sport that also require you to be able to deal with a lot of teasing and loss of pride.

Personally, I'd rather lose face and be able to walk away.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote


My question is how long did you guys focus on the PLF during your AFF ground training?? Do you think there should be more focus on it?



Sometime you could spend over an hour or more explaining and doing PLF's on the ground, and the student seem to forget it upon landing.:S





Is an hour enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Is an hour enough?




Depends on the student......
I only privately train one student at a time now. Some understand it and get the technique in a short time, and then some dont.
It's not a hard thing to do, but at times, under canopy, they get mind overload and unfortunatly forget.


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Sometime you could spend over an hour or more explaining and doing PLF's on the ground, and the student seem to forget it upon landing



That is true, but I think in general better training would make the PLF more of an automatic response.

When I was trained on rounds back in the late 70's and early 80's we drilled PLF's like crazy. It became an automatic response. I've used PLF's several times since then on modern squares when I knew the landing was going to hell, and the PLF's have saved me. I remain thankful to my early instructors for focusing on that skill.

Like the original poster on this thread, I'm concerned that we don't spend enough time on PLF's. It's not really such a big deal for most student jumps, but when the crap is hitting the fan a student should be able to pull a PLF out of his butt, and too often they can't do that.

My sense is that when a landing is about to go bad our students dig into their memory and training, and then lift their legs as they were taught to do for the first tandem. Better PLF training would be an improvement.

With all that said, the level of training varies from DZ to DZ, and among instructors.
.
Tom Buchanan
Instructor Emeritus
Comm Pilot MSEL,G
Author: JUMP! Skydiving Made Fun and Easy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

When I was trained on rounds back in the late 70's and early 80's we drilled PLF's like crazy.



Thats kinda the point. We do NOT jump rounds anymore. :S
Todays student canopies have a forward speed and approach. Sometimes not enabling the student to get into the best PLF position. [:/]
Drilling it into a students head, like he or she is in a military FJC, for hours and hours is stupid.
If they learn the reason and the dynamics of it during the training, and they exibit that they can do it correctly, then it's time to move on to other areas of the training program IMO.




Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In many threads I see people mention that they broke their ankle, leg or foot landing. These are usually people with under 60 jumps or so.

9 times out of 10 a PLF can prevent breaking something. You might get up using a string of profanity but you will get up with your bones intact.



If it's only good for 9 of 10, there's your broken bone count!

The PLF training I got was well suited to my first landing when I flared 3 feet high. Minimal forward speed and I landing laughing.

But it's very different when you're coming in fast in no wind conditions and don't flare effectively to plane out and bleed off the speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

When I was trained on rounds back in the late 70's and early 80's we drilled PLF's like crazy.



Thats kinda the point. We do NOT jump rounds anymore. :S
Todays student canopies have a forward speed and approach. Sometimes not enabling the student to get into the best PLF position. [:/]
Drilling it into a students head, like he or she is in a military FJC, for hours and hours is stupid.
If they learn the reason and the dynamics of it during the training, and they exibit that they can do it correctly, then it's time to move on to other areas of the train program IMO.


Be safe
Ed



Be safe
Ed



Gotcha.. In that case I dont and wont feel bad about rolling my eyes when I read or hear about someone breaking their leg from flaring to high or to low. It is their responsibility to think about getting their feet and knees together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It is their responsibility to think about getting their feet and knees together.




Ultimately, from the time they leave the plane, the entire skydive is their responsibility, until they land back on earth, isn't it? ;)


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

When I was trained on rounds back in the late 70's and early 80's we drilled PLF's like crazy.



Todays student canopies have a forward speed and approach. Sometimes not enabling the student to get into the best PLF position. [:/]



I think its a little bit easier to get into a good plf position under a square simply because you are always going to be going forward like you just said... Much easier to set up a good roll. Instead of fighting oscilation while drifting to the left etc. But this is coming from my 30 square parachute jumps and 37 round parachute jumps of experience.. I could be completely wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think its a little bit easier to get into a good plf position under a square simply because you are always going to be going forward like you just said... Much easier to set up a good roll.




So you think doing a PLF is easier facing straight forward, then at a slight angle such as 30-45 degrees? Hmmm....


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Quote

I think its a little bit easier to get into a good plf position under a square simply because you are always going to be going forward like you just said... Much easier to set up a good roll.




So you think doing a PLF is easier facing straight forward, then at a slight angle such as 30-45 degrees? Hmmm....


Be safe
Ed



Its not always at a slight angle. When jumping rounds if the wind is really strong and you havent pulled your slips correctly you could still be rocking back and forth going at a 90 degree angle to the left or right... Under a square you'll be going straight ahead... It isnt terribly difficult to turn your body in that direction and i think the PLF is much cleaner having forward speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you have forward speed then you have plenty of flare power... use it. I have met more than a couple people that think PLFing is acceptable on every landing. They have all been injured when they failed to pull it off properly.

Fly your canopy all the way to the ground... you won't need to PLF except on _very_ rare occasions.
NSCR-2376, SCR-15080

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is why you teach your students to rotate the hips in either direction 45 degrees, to make it a right front or left front.

Front PLF's are easier and IMO safer than rears. Sides are easiest to perform, again just my opinion.

(My Opinion is based on 150 Military Static Line jumps and 20 years experience in the Airborne, including 4+ years as a Black Hat.)
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That is why you teach your students to rotate the hips in either direction 45 degrees, to make it a right front or left front.

Front PLF's are easier and IMO safer than rears. Sides are easiest to perform, again just my opinion.

(My Opinion is based on 150 Military Static Line jumps and 20 years experience in the Airborne, including 4+ years as a Black Hat.)



lol then i'd say its a good opinion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That is why you teach your students to rotate the hips in either direction 45 degrees, to make it a right front or left front.



True. Though we do teach a slight rotation of the hips for proper PLF, they sometimes forget that part also. [:/]

Quote

Sides are easiest to perform, again just my opinion.



Depends on the landing area the students have, I've seen some pretty shitty ones. [:/]


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Because I am retarded I had more than one occasion where I flared to high or to low and had to PLF.



You can spend all day teaching PLFs and the dive flow. It is not always feasible.

More emphasis on canopy control would, most likely, cure one's need to PLF. You should, however, be prepared to PLF on every skydive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reality may be PLF training will be minimal these days. But I'm glad along with Tom my civilian training included doing PLF's backwards off the roof of a pickup. All the first jump students were sore back then. Not from the jump but from the training.:S

Like Tom I've walked away from some nasty screw ups by dropping into a PLF automatically.
I'm old for my age.
Terry Urban
D-8631
FAA DPRE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

training included doing PLF's backwards off the roof of a pickup.



Glad it was you and not me.......:D

Then again, in todays litigious society, people might sue before even making their jump......


Be safe
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likewise I use PLFs to rescue me from less-than-awesome landings on my modern square. When I first got back into the sport and was jumping a Safire with a longer flare stroke than I had arms, no-wind days always called for PLFs.

I'm sure I could have exhibited more skill. However, I found that getting a different canopy after 150 or so jumps was far more comfortable. But I still am ready to PLF when needed.

I have about 500 round jumps, and was one of those instructors who drummed it into students' heads in the early 80's; I've done my share :ph34r:

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think my ground school (and AFF) I was ex-military, 'cause she had us PLFing around the landing area for what seemed like hours but was probably only half an hour or so total. I got the feeling she did this a lot.

So on about my fourth jump on my new sport main, I flared just that bit too hard, too late, and executed what was apparently a textbook PLF without even noticing I did it. Got mud on my lower leg, arse and in my container-top up the same side to prove it too.

Muscle memory rocks. Make students really gain it for the PLF, we will need it.

Thanks Luci ;)
--
"I'll tell you how all skydivers are judged, . They are judged by the laws of physics." - kkeenan

"You jump out, pull the string and either live or die. What's there to be good at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0