President Potty

[JerryBaumchen 1,047]

Hi folks,

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.):  You may not realize it yet, but they’re coming for all of us

One can only hope:  GOP pressures DOJ for answers on Trump raid | The Hill

Jerry Baumchen

[brenthutch 383]

4 hours ago, SkyDekker said:

IMHO there is only one reason he would keep them, which is to monetize them.

100% agree 

[JoeWeber 2,297]

7 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

100% agree 

Money is only one, and not the most valuable, counting tool of a narcissistic egomaniac. 

[jakee 1,254]

2 hours ago, SkyDekker said:

lol, ok buddy. I am literally the second post under the pictures.

And that changes what you wrote?

Quote

The pictures are a nothing burger, cause they don't prove anything. 

You're positive that Trump was monetising top secret national security documents because you think he would but you need courtroom standard proof that he flushed some paper down the toilet?

Quote

I will leave it at that. You can have the last word after this.

Ah the last resort of the passive-aggressive.

[Phil1111 910]

5 hours ago, JoeWeber said:

... No, as I think about it more I'm having doubts that it's classified documents they're after.

Agree. There is so much sh*t around trump. Defining what type of stench is involved is likely only known by the FBI, prosecutors, the judge and the idiot together with his lawyers.

[kallend 1,622]

27 minutes ago, Phil1111 said:

Agree. There is so much sh*t around trump. Defining what type of stench is involved is likely only known by the FBI, prosecutors, the judge and the idiot together with his lawyers.

Yet clearly he believes himself to be above the law.

I truly hope he gets a rude awakening that he is not a monarch.

[wolfriverjoe 1,340]

29 minutes ago, kallend said:

Yet clearly he believes himself to be above the law.

I truly hope he gets a rude awakening that he is not a monarch.

I think he did.

Something like 30 FBI agents going into his "home" (one of them anyway), searching through his stuff, opening his safe, all of that is very unpleasant.

The fact that the Secret Service were the ones that allowed the FBI in is just icing on the cake. They had to. A search warrant isn't something that can be argued or debated on the front porch.

[Phil1111 910]

On 8/9/2022 at 4:58 PM, kallend said:

Yet clearly he believes himself to be above the law.

I truly hope he gets a rude awakening that he is not a monarch.

Thats precious that you still think that. Yet you're a pretty smart guy.

[billeisele 122]

His mistake was not digitizing what he had and storing it on a server. Apparently, it's OK to have a server with restricted government documents in your home.

Getting past the poke above.....the server issue occurred under a less aggressive DOJ. Certainly Garland isn't naive enough to think that when the power structure shifts these type investigations will be aimed at others.

I don't know, maybe a war with total destruction of the power brokers would be a good thing. I wonder if it's possible to get back to a government that acts in the best interest of the people. 

[wmw999 2,119]

Bill, in the whataboutism in there, how do you rank Ivanka’s admitted government emails on private servers as against HRC’s? 

Wendy P. 

[kallend 1,622]

1 hour ago, billeisele said:

His mistake was not digitizing what he had and storing it on a server. Apparently, it's OK to have a server with restricted government documents in your home.

Getting past the poke above.....the server issue occurred under a less aggressive DOJ. Certainly Garland isn't naive enough to think that when the power structure shifts these type investigations will be aimed at others.

I don't know, maybe a war with total destruction of the power brokers would be a good thing. I wonder if it's possible to get back to a government that acts in the best interest of the people. 

You seem to forget (conveniently) about withholding government property (according to the director of the National Archives).

[jakee 1,254]

1 hour ago, billeisele said:

His mistake was not digitizing what he had and storing it on a server. Apparently, it's OK to have a server with restricted government documents in your home.

Getting past the poke above.....the server issue occurred under a less aggressive DOJ.

The FBI investigated Clinton too - in public in the heat of the election season. What on earth makes you think they were being any less aggressive then?

[kallend 1,622]

30 minutes ago, jakee said:

The FBI investigated Clinton too - in public in the heat of the election season. What on earth makes you think they were being any less aggressive then?

Partisanship?

[Phil1111 910]

50 minutes ago, jakee said:

The FBI investigated Clinton too - in public in the heat of the election season. What on earth makes you think they were being any less aggressive then?

FOXstream media.

[billeisele 122]

36 minutes ago, kallend said:

Partisanship?

 

1 hour ago, jakee said:

The FBI investigated Clinton too - in public in the heat of the election season. What on earth makes you think they were being any less aggressive then?

Huh? They knew about the server and did nothing...well until after it was bleached and then did nothing. Your blinders are on tight and stating "Partianship" is the joke of the day...so far.

[Stumpy 256]

1 minute ago, billeisele said:

 

Huh? They knew about the server and did nothing...well until after it was bleached and then did nothing. Your blinders are on tight and stating "Partianship" is the joke of the day...so far.

Even after everything you have seen in the last few years you are still going with the "but her emails" defense?

It would be funny if it wasn't so pitiable.

[Phil1111 910]

6 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Even after everything you have seen in the last few years you are still going with the "but her emails" defense?

It would be funny if it wasn't so pitiable.

Well the FBI and the Secret Service is out to "get trump". So there is that.

and MSM, Xi, leftists, IRS,democrats, prosecutors,banks, the EU, NATO, etc.

The only real friends he has is his family. Putin, MBS, and Kim.

Edited August 12, 2022 by Phil1111

[jakee 1,254]

25 minutes ago, billeisele said:

Huh? They knew about the server and did nothing...well until after it was bleached and then did nothing. Your blinders are on tight and stating "Partianship" is the joke of the day...so far.

If it was bleached where did they get her emails from? If they did nothing, why were they publicly announcing the progress of their investigation while the 2016 election was happening? If they were too lenient, why did Trump’s own Justice Department report say the investigation was fair and the conclusion correct?

’Blinders’ is the joke of the day.

[SkyDekker 1,121]

5 hours ago, billeisele said:

His mistake was not digitizing what he had and storing it on a server. Apparently, it's OK to have a server with restricted government documents in your home.

One minor difference might be that the Secretary of State has a security clearance and a former president does not.

Other than all the other difference that you clearly cannot see with those immense partisan blinders on.

The FBI announcement to reopen the investigation 11 days prior to the election effectively sank her presidential bid. An announcement that was against FBI policy.

This idea that the FBI, led by a Trump picked Republican, is this bastion of socialist progessive Lieberalism is even more stupid than the constant bleating of: Buttery Males.

[kallend 1,622]

3 hours ago, billeisele said:

 

Huh? They knew about the server and did nothing...well until after it was bleached and then did nothing. Your blinders are on tight and stating "Partianship" is the joke of the day...so far.

QED, thank you.

[JoeWeber 2,297]

7 hours ago, billeisele said:

His mistake was not digitizing what he had and storing it on a server. Apparently, it's OK to have a server with restricted government documents in your home.

Getting past the poke above.....the server issue occurred under a less aggressive DOJ. Certainly Garland isn't naive enough to think that when the power structure shifts these type investigations will be aimed at others.

I don't know, maybe a war with total destruction of the power brokers would be a good thing. I wonder if it's possible to get back to a government that acts in the best interest of the people. 

What a beautiful example of traveling from being steeped in a narrative to an acceptance of conspiracy theories. 

[JerryBaumchen 1,047]

52 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

What a beautiful example of traveling from being steeped in a narrative to an acceptance of conspiracy theories. 

Hi Joe,

Today, that is how the GOP rolls.

Jerry Baumchen

[GeorgiaDon 340]

4 hours ago, billeisele said:

 

Huh? They knew about the server and did nothing...well until after it was bleached and then did nothing. Your blinders are on tight and stating "Partianship" is the joke of the day...so far.

Both Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private email, and classified emails were sent to those private email accounts, just as happened with Hillary Clinton.  Why does that make Clinton the devil incarnate, but Rice and Powell are excused?  Maybe blinders?  Maybe partisanship? 

[SkyDekker 1,121]

27 minutes ago, GeorgiaDon said:

Both Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private email, and classified emails were sent to those private email accounts, just as happened with Hillary Clinton.  Why does that make Clinton the devil incarnate, but Rice and Powell are excused?  Maybe blinders?  Maybe partisanship? 

So did trump family members. Some of whom were unable to pass tests for security clearances and Trump had to order them to be given to get past that.

[kallend 1,622]

1 hour ago, JoeWeber said:

What a beautiful example of traveling from being steeped in a narrative to an acceptance of conspiracy theories. 

Are you saying that he's going 'full grassy knoll' on us?