turtlespeed 212 #76 September 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: Clearly your understanding of this subject is the same as your understanding of your constitution. One sided and extremely limited. And personal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 189 #77 September 21, 2020 (edited) 31 minutes ago, jakee said: 2 hours ago, Coreece said: Leaving it black and white might make it easier, but truth and justice are not easily found, and often shaded gray. Just keep in mind that It is demonstrated time and again that when there are grey areas available in charging and sentencing then black or white has a lot to do with it. That's kind of what I was referring to earlier. A sexual relationship between 17 and 18 year olds is a grey area, but most people aren't going to take offense if it seems "normal" to them. But as soon as it's a relationship they don't approve of, they get to rack up the charges even if if they agree it was consensual? Edited September 21, 2020 by Coreece Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,621 #78 September 21, 2020 2 hours ago, turtlespeed said: I read that - I'm not arguing with you over your perceived stance - You and I agree on that. It's the lack of a simple Yes or No when asked if he should be charged as an adult. Here's a hint: 2 + 2 = 4 However, his adult enablers should have the book thrown at them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites