billvon 2,380 #1926 June 7, 2018 >Why does the local newspaper continue to give this woman a platform for such things? Because it sells papers and gets them attention (which equals $$$.) Heck, you are paying attention to the paper now; you obviously read it, so it worked on you. If they hadn't published that, you likely would never have read that site. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,380 #1927 June 7, 2018 RiggerLeeDid she ever pay up? Lee http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4862028#4862028"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flyhi 24 #1928 June 7, 2018 QuoteMile-Hi pilot Andrew Hill testified during the trial ( CQS vs. Mile-Hi Skydiving) that he was in the skydiving plane when Mile-Hi owner Frank Casares intentionally harassed our home Why was Andrew Hill fired from Mile-Hi Skydiving? (Assumption on my part.)Shit happens. And it usually happens because of physics. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyBoulder 1 #1929 June 7, 2018 Jumpdude I'd still LOVE to see an F-18 make some low afterburner passes or SLOWWWW AV-8 Harrier passes by her house to show her how loud it could be and show her how to appreciate it for what it is rather than what it could be!! Just sayin! A number of us who live in Colorado and have MHS as our home DZ made several comments during the trial that derogatory comments about Kim, people threatening fly by's, etc. on DZ.com were not helping our case. This latest rant is about "bullies" threatening these sorts of things, false claims of it happening, etc. These sorts of comments are counter productive and feed right into her story. For those of us who live in Colorado, please refrain from these sorts of statements. First amendment aside, such comments do more harm than good. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,380 #1930 June 7, 2018 flyhiQuoteMile-Hi pilot Andrew Hill testified during the trial ( CQS vs. Mile-Hi Skydiving) that he was in the skydiving plane when Mile-Hi owner Frank Casares intentionally harassed our home Why was Andrew Hill fired from Mile-Hi Skydiving? (Assumption on my part.) Gear-up landing with one of MHS's King Airs."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
artard 0 #1931 June 7, 2018 JohnnyBoulder ***I'd still LOVE to see an F-18 make some low afterburner passes or SLOWWWW AV-8 Harrier passes by her house to show her how loud it could be and show her how to appreciate it for what it is rather than what it could be!! Just sayin! A number of us who live in Colorado and have MHS as our home DZ made several comments during the trial that derogatory comments about Kim, people threatening fly by's, etc. on DZ.com were not helping our case. This latest rant is about "bullies" threatening these sorts of things, false claims of it happening, etc. These sorts of comments are counter productive and feed right into her story. For those of us who live in Colorado, please refrain from these sorts of statements. First amendment aside, such comments do more harm than good. I don't know if it's still active but the "Citizens Against Citizens For Quiet Skies" facebook page is full of exactly what you're talking about and doesn't help the cause at all. Just a bunch of people talking trash and calling Kim a bitch/cunt/etc (at least when I left it couple years ago).http://www.mixcloud.com/prajna http://vimeo.com/avidya Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bigfalls 110 #1932 February 11, 2020 Rep Joe Neguse (D-Colorado) sponsored the Aircraft Noise Reduction Act. The act would allow regulation of airport noise at the local level, reversing the policy of federal aviation regulation that has been in place since the 1920's. Did Kim have something to do with this. https://www.dailycamera.com/2019/12/12/congressman-neguse-introduces-aircraft-noise-reduction-act/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 93 #1933 February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Bigfalls said: Rep Joe Neguse (D-Colorado) sponsored the Aircraft Noise Reduction Act. The act would allow regulation of airport noise at the local level, reversing the policy of federal aviation regulation that has been in place since the 1920's. Did Kim have something to do with this. https://www.dailycamera.com/2019/12/12/congressman-neguse-introduces-aircraft-noise-reduction-act/ It appears that it would run into supremacy problems - local vs federal laws. Is there some reason why the local lawmakers would think that it would survive scrutiny? Is this just a gesture which they know will get slapped down as unconstitutional? How do they think their law will be able to require "...federal funds cannot be withheld from an airport that chooses to locally regulate noise." ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Divalent 89 #1934 March 7, 2020 On 2/11/2020 at 1:45 PM, sundevil777 said: It appears that it would run into supremacy problems - local vs federal laws. Is there some reason why the local lawmakers would think that it would survive scrutiny? Is this just a gesture which they know will get slapped down as unconstitutional? How do they think their law will be able to require "...federal funds cannot be withheld from an airport that chooses to locally regulate noise." ? Supremacy would only be an issue if a local gov passed a law that conflicts with fed law. Here it would be a *Federal law* that explicitly gives local govs the right to pass laws regulating local noise beyond what Fed law does. So any local restrictions would not conflict with the federal law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 93 #1935 March 7, 2020 6 hours ago, Divalent said: Supremacy would only be an issue if a local gov passed a law that conflicts with fed law. Here it would be a *Federal law* that explicitly gives local govs the right to pass laws regulating local noise beyond what Fed law does. So any local restrictions would not conflict with the federal law. Yes, of course, It is a proposed federal law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpenfool 2 #1936 March 14, 2020 So, if this law was passed, Minneapolis Residents could shut down MSP international airport because of noise? I hope they think this thru. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,340 #1937 March 15, 2020 6 hours ago, skyjumpenfool said: So, if this law was passed, Minneapolis Residents could shut down MSP international airport because of noise? I hope they think this thru. If you read the story, it clearly mentions Denver International. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 620 #1938 March 15, 2020 Follow the bill here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
