1 1
normiss

National protests against Minneapolis police murderers?

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, olofscience said:

The exact reason for this drop is complicated, but in the end, it did not have the effect they thought it would.

Gentlemen, let's get the thing straight, once and for all. The policeman isn't there to create disorder; the policeman is there to preserve disorder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, turtlespeed said:

That goes along with a cat looking for mice.  If the cat quits actively looking for the mice - it doesn't find as many.

Using Occam's razor . . .

Of course, crimes are never discovered unless police are actively looking for them.  Makes sense, in an Alice in Wonderland kind of way.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Like I said in another post.  Let's take the police out of the equation and see how that works.

I highly suggest you read the article. That's almost exactly what they tried in 2014.

The main difference now is that they want to redirect more funds to community programmes and social support rather than policing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jakee said:

How many major crimes do the cops find by being out on the street vs what is reported to them? The crimes referred to in the article are "murder, rape, robbery, felony assault, burglary, grand larceny, and grand theft auto". Like, if my car was nicked or my house was burgled I wouldn't go looking for a cop on the street then give up on reporting the crime if I couldn't physically find one. There are these things called telephones nowadays.

How many crimes are reported at all, when you are told that your police force isn't going to do anything with it anyway?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

How many crimes are reported at all, when you are told that your police force isn't going to do anything with it anyway?

Since you don't seem to get it...here's the main argument in the article against that:

Quote

The drop also lingered for the first few weeks after the slowdown and after public statements reporting that it was over. That also undermines the idea that people weren’t bothering to report crimes because they thought there was no point. It’s not possible to show conclusively that under-reporting doesn’t explain the pattern, but it doesn’t seem like a particularly good explanation.

It's an entire section in the article, and there's also the actual research paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0211-5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

How many crimes are reported at all, when you are told that your police force isn't going to do anything with it anyway?

First, people were not told that. Investigation of major crimes continued while the beat cops were doing there stand down.

Second, I'm lucky enough not to have had to claim for theft on my car or home insurance but I imagine they'd want a police report regardless.

Third, it was discussed in the article. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

We agree!

Discussed doesn't mean it was right either.

The research paper doesn't even mean it is right.

How is it that we agree when you stated that it was the reason for the drop in crime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, normiss said:

Wait. What? Local white dude set the PD on fire in MPLS???

Surprise. Not really though. Totally expected.

Right up there with the response by the police unions.

White people trying to stand in and appropriate the protests are really quite common.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/politics/democrats-criticized-kente-cloth-trnd/index.html

It doesn't seem to end well, though.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, wmw999 said:

And he's already apologized (probably under pressure, but pressure couldn't happen to a nicer guy): "did not reflect the sentiment I was trying to convey"

He was just trying to convey that he supports cops who knock down 75 year olds and almost kill them.  But then it went through the crazy straw filter of the loser liberal media and came out as something that everyone thought was bad.  It's the media's fault for reporting that, not his fault.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Minneapolis thugs-with-badges didn't just slash tires on a couple cars; They slashed tires on dozens of cars in a Kmart parking lot. This was a lot they had taken over, and which protestors could not reach.

https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/06/09/873110812/police-officers-slashed-car-tires-during-minneapolis-protests-police-agencies-sa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
1 hour ago, ryoder said:

So the Minneapolis thugs-with-badges didn't just slash tires on a couple cars; They slashed tires on dozens of cars in a Kmart parking lot. This was a lot they had taken over, and which protestors could not reach.

Sounds like that's going to rumble on for a while. I wonder if they're going to explain why they needed to disable the cars in an area they already cleared and controlled. And how much money they're going to end up spending to compensate the owners.

Edited by jakee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, jakee said:

Sounds like that's going to rumble on for a while. I wonder if they're going to explain why they needed to disable the cars in an area they already cleared and controlled. And how much money they're going to end up spending to compensate the owners.

Are the cops going to be charged?

Criminal damage to property is a crime (duh).

However, if the damage is over $1000, it becomes a felony.
It would depend on whether or not all the cars would be lumped into one offense or not.
Some good tires can top $1k per set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wolfriverjoe said:

Are the cops going to be charged?

Criminal damage to property is a crime (duh).

However, if the damage is over $1000, it becomes a felony.
It would depend on whether or not all the cars would be lumped into one offense or not.
Some good tires can top $1k per set.

I'm sure if a civilian did it, I'm sure they would charge it as one crime to multiple vehicles, just to ensure it was a felony.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1