SkyDekker 1,122 #51 January 30, 2020 2 hours ago, Skwrl said: Hey, this is serious. To any Qanon believers, I want to take a moment to emphasize that drinking bleach is very, very bad, and you should not do it under any circumstances. I know I've had my differences with Qanon folks over the years, but let me, as a liberal, be frank with you. Do not drink bleach. The scientific elites are in agreement here, it's a bad idea. Liberals - from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi to AOC - all agree that it's a bad idea to drink bleach. I think you'll find most Hollywood celebrities also agree that drinking bleach is wrong. So don't do it, Q army. We, liberals, are telling you not to drink bleach. Please. Don't. I just want to add that Greta also agrees it is a bad idea to drink bleach. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 232 #52 January 30, 2020 36 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: I just want to add that Greta also agrees it is a bad idea to drink bleach. This is actually a good exercise. Ron, you're not going to drink any bleach, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,396 #53 January 30, 2020 3 hours ago, Skwrl said: Hey, this is serious. To any Qanon believers, I want to take a moment to emphasize that drinking bleach is very, very bad, and you should not do it under any circumstances. I know I've had my differences with Qanon folks over the years, but let me, as a liberal, be frank with you. Do not drink bleach. The scientific elites are in agreement here, it's a bad idea. Liberals - from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi to AOC - all agree that it's a bad idea to drink bleach. I think you'll find most Hollywood celebrities also agree that drinking bleach is wrong. So don't do it, Q army. We, liberals, are telling you not to drink bleach. Please. Don't. Now cut that out! You'll have Trump supporters drinking gallons of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,299 #54 January 31, 2020 4 hours ago, billvon said: Now cut that out! You'll have Trump supporters drinking gallons of it. And why not? One half part Peroxide, two tea bags and a mint spritzer and Bob's your Uncle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #55 January 31, 2020 21 minutes ago, JoeWeber said: And why not? One half part Peroxide, two tea bags and a mint spritzer and Bob's your Uncle. How do you know my Uncle? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 58 #56 January 31, 2020 17 hours ago, DJL said: This is actually a good exercise. Ron, you're not going to drink any bleach, right? LOL! I do not follow the QAnons. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skwrl 56 #57 January 31, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, RonD1120 said: LOL! I do not follow the QAnons. But you still believe that there is a secret military operation led by President Trump to overthrow the pedophile Satanist conspiracy that secretly controls the world, and that a "Q" is sharing information about the operation in a cryptic way, right? Ron's either trying to dodge this by saying he follows "Q" (not "QAnon", since that's just the media calls it) or he's trying to distance himself from some of the other followers of Q that are referring to themselves collectively as "QAnon". Pretty bad faith (attempted) dodge, I'd say. Or, I suppose, he could have finally realized the whole Q fantasy for what it is: batshit crazy fantasy. But since he's still posting tags with what I call WubbaDubba (more accurately WWG1WGA, the Q "slogan") and "Patriots are in control" (newer slogan), I'm going with he's still drinking the Q KoolAid. Edited January 31, 2020 by Skwrl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #58 January 31, 2020 1 hour ago, Skwrl said: But you still believe that there is a secret military operation led by President Trump to overthrow the pedophile Satanist conspiracy that secretly controls the world, and that a "Q" is sharing information about the operation in a cryptic way, right? Ron's either trying to dodge this by saying he follows "Q" (not "QAnon", since that's just the media calls it) or he's trying to distance himself from some of the other followers of Q that are referring to themselves collectively as "QAnon". Pretty bad faith (attempted) dodge, I'd say. Or, I suppose, he could have finally realized the whole Q fantasy for what it is: batshit crazy fantasy. But since he's still posting tags with what I call WubbaDubba (more accurately WWG1WGA, the Q "slogan") and "Patriots are in control" (newer slogan), I'm going with he's still drinking the Q KoolAid. There could also be a chance he's referring to the 'Q' in LGBTQ. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 58 #59 January 31, 2020 For those truly interested check out: Calm Before The Storm by Dave Hayes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 232 #60 January 31, 2020 3 hours ago, Skwrl said: I'm going with he's still drinking the Q KoolAid. I think they call it Qool-Aid Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #61 January 31, 2020 1 hour ago, DJL said: I think they call it Qool-Aid Why would you think that? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,299 #62 January 31, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, normiss said: There could also be a chance he's referring to the 'Q' in LGBTQ. Holy Crap! You nailed it, man. That's it. Ron, you are good with us, no judgment. We've got your back......... Edited January 31, 2020 by JoeWeber 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #63 February 1, 2020 2 hours ago, JoeWeber said: Holy Crap! You nailed it, man. That's it. Ron, you are good with us, no judgment. We've got your back......... Wow - so all it takes to get on your side is to be a minority in sexuality? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeWeber 2,299 #64 February 1, 2020 2 hours ago, turtlespeed said: Wow - so all it takes to get on your side is to be a minority in sexuality? Nope. It takes being clever. Bye, again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #65 February 1, 2020 6 hours ago, turtlespeed said: Wow - so all it takes to get on your side is to be a minority in sexuality? Better than it being all it takes to get on your bad side. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #66 February 1, 2020 7 hours ago, jakee said: Better than it being all it takes to get on your bad side. And what is that, exactly? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #67 February 1, 2020 3 hours ago, turtlespeed said: And what is that, exactly? What is what, exactly? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #68 February 1, 2020 4 hours ago, jakee said: What is what, exactly? Scroll up to where you made a statement. Its not far. It starts with "Better than" I'm asking what it takes, exactly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #69 February 1, 2020 30 minutes ago, turtlespeed said: Scroll up to where you made a statement. Its not far. It starts with "Better than" I'm asking what it takes, exactly. The thing I am quoting in that post. How on earth do you manage to get confused by that? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #70 February 1, 2020 8 hours ago, turtlespeed said: Better than it being all it takes to get on your bad side. I'm not confused - Above (quoted) is what you typed. What is it exactly that it takes to get on my bad side? How could you possibly have not understood the question? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 291 #71 February 2, 2020 2 hours ago, turtlespeed said: How could you possibly have not understood the question? How could you possibly have not understood the statement? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #72 February 2, 2020 2 hours ago, headoverheels said: How could you possibly have not understood the statement? I understood the statement. There were no metrics included, so I asked for them to be stated. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 291 #73 February 2, 2020 2 hours ago, turtlespeed said: I understood the statement. There were no metrics included, so I asked for them to be stated. So, you didn't understand the statement. Go back and read it as a disinterested party. Hint, it isn't about you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #74 February 2, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, turtlespeed said: I'm not confused - Above (quoted) is what you typed. What is it exactly that it takes to get on my bad side? "Wow - so all it takes to get on your side is to be a minority in sexuality?" Again, this is what I quoted in the post and it is clearly, obviously and unmistakeably what I am referring to. Quote How could you possibly have not understood the question? I obviously understood the question, I obviously answered it, and you obviously know that I did. Why do you deliberately try and make yourself look this stupid? Edited February 2, 2020 by jakee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #75 February 2, 2020 6 hours ago, jakee said: "Wow - so all it takes to get on your side is to be a minority in sexuality?" Again, this is what I quoted in the post and it is clearly, obviously and unmistakeably what I am referring to. I obviously understood the question, I obviously answered it, and you obviously know that I did. Why do you deliberately try and make yourself look this stupid? Here is a screen grab. You quoted me. So I ask again - what exactly does it take to get on my bad side? Why are you having so much trouble with this? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
