2 2
DJL

US Baghdad Embassy Attacked by Protesters

Recommended Posts

Progressives always try to take a rational approach to the ME.  You just forget that you aren't dealing with rational folks over there.  What do you think we should do about a "government official" (I use that term lightly) like this guy?  We know he's directly responsible for hundreds of killings, and indirectly for thousands.  Ask him to sit down for tea.  FFS :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
12 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Progressives always try to take a rational approach to the ME.

And irrationality has always worked in the past? I suppose in a way it has. At this time the Strait of Hormuz is still open for the tankers to pass, the House of Saud is still more or less in control of the largest oil fields and still selling their soul to the west. There is no united Arabia, the tribes are still divided. And most importantly Persia has not been able to reform anything like a Caliphate. So, the west has been able to accomplish it's main objectives for the last century. It's just too bad for the US that it has had to bear most of the cost. Suckers.

 

And by the way, who are you to define rational?

Edited by gowlerk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
26 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

And by the way, who are you to define rational?

A white American male, of course. Whatever they are is normal, everything else is for them to assign a value to.  

Ergo “Why can’t they assimilate (and be more like us)?”

Wendy P. 

Edited by wmw999
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Progressives always try to take a rational approach to the ME. 

And it's always been fucked up by people taking irrational approaches. 

 

Quote

What do you think we should do about a "government official" (I use that term lightly) like this guy?  We know he's directly responsible for hundreds of killings, and indirectly for thousands.  Ask him to sit down for tea.  FFS :S

And why is he an official in a government that allows him to take those actions? Because we once overthrew a democratic government for corporate profit. There is a direct lineage of cause and effect from what we did then to what's hapening now. This is where irrational aggression gets you.

 

Quote

You just forget that you aren't dealing with rational folks over there.  

We could have been, if we hadn't fucked it all up on numerous occasions. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Progressives always try to take a rational approach to the ME.  You just forget that you aren't dealing with rational folks over there.  What do you think we should do about a "government official" (I use that term lightly) like this guy?  We know he's directly responsible for hundreds of killings, and indirectly for thousands.  Ask him to sit down for tea.  FFS :S

Please define 'rational' (as in 'the folks over there').

Believes in the same "God"?
Forgets our behavior (both the US specifically & the West in general) for the past 100 years or so?
Has no interest in projecting power and influence over the region?
Has no interest in preventing it's enemies from doing the same?

And what would you suggest as an alternative to the 'progressive's rational approach'?


Bomb them back to the Stone Age?
Invade and replace the government with one we like?
"Glass parking lot"?

One of the first rules of international relations is the basic understanding that most, if not all leadership is rational from their own viewpoint

To think Iran is irrational for having a strong hatred for the West in general and the US specifically is to ignore history.

Both in the short and long terms.

And as far a 'sitting down for tea', what do you think about Trump sitting down with KJU?

Is he not a murderous despot?
Does he not represent a serious and significant threat?

Yet Trump elevates his stature by a huge (and I mean HYOOOOOOOOGE!!!!!) margin. 
Both by words and actions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please...more of the old "its our fault" bullshit.  You forget...Clinton was given a chance to take out OBL but didn't have the balls.  How that would have changed history.  I'm glad this guy is pink spray.  

You think you can have a discussion with these folks? Ask Jimmy Carter how well his Camp David accord worked.  Three years after Sadat was dead.  There will never be peace in the ME.  Anyone who says it can happen is delusional.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, airdvr said:

Please...more of the old "its our fault" bullshit.  You forget...Clinton was given a chance to take out OBL but didn't have the balls.  How that would have changed history.  I'm glad this guy is pink spray.  

 

and had bush sr. (or was it reagan) merely acknowledged bin laden he wouldn't have turned against us, unless i have that wrong.  if so, please correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, airdvr said:

Please...more of the old "its our fault" bullshit. 

It is our fault. They're not over here, we're over there.

Quote

You forget...Clinton was given a chance to take out OBL but didn't have the balls.  How that would have changed history. 

How many middle easterners think the same thing about any US president you care to name?

Quote

You think you can have a discussion with these folks? Ask Jimmy Carter how well his Camp David accord worked.  Three years after Sadat was dead.  There will never be peace in the ME.  Anyone who says it can happen is delusional.

Why, because they've always been at war? Join the fucking club. Have you ever seen a timelapse of European borders? Thousands of years of constant war. We only stopped fighting each other because we became so good at it we would have literally destroyed the planet if we tried it again. But even that didn't stop us from fighting - we just went to the effort of travelling all over the rest of the world to go and find places to fight in. But do you think you can have a discussion with white western europeans? Pretty sure you do.

 

There is nothing unique about the fact the ME has been in constant conflict for centuries. There are no fundamental differences between them and us. Claims that there are can only be founded on wilful ignorance and racism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

36 hours or so after the assassination I am noticing a distinct lack of supportive messaging from the R party Senators, aside from Moscow Mitch. I'm sure many of them are pissed off over the lack of notification as Trump huddled in Mara-largo with a decidedly less than A team group of advisors and made a hasty decision. I would guess most of them are sniffing the air and huddling to get more information on just WTF Donny was thinking.
 

It's also possible that the orange one is becoming more unhinged than usual and that his administration is getting spooked by his increasingly erratic behavior. Tomorrow is Sunday. If there are not a large group of heavy weight pols making the rounds of the talk shows to support this move I'm going to start thinking some are getting cold feet.

 

I've always said that this job is far beyond his ability and that he will crack from the pressure. This large error may be the beginning of his undoing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sfzombie13 said:

and had bush sr. (or was it reagan) merely acknowledged bin laden he wouldn't have turned against us, unless i have that wrong.  if so, please correct.

That is the very type of thinking that the ME has used for centuries to justify their clan wars.  Your great grandfather offended my great grandfather ad nauseum

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, airdvr said:

That is the very type of thinking that the ME has used for centuries to justify their clan wars.  Your great grandfather offended my great grandfather ad nauseum

Which is, again, any different to any other part of the world because...?

 

I mean hell, you are doing the exact same thing right now. Justifying potentially going to war today because of what their great grandfathers did centuries ago.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, airdvr said:

Please...more of the old "its our fault" bullshit.  You forget...Clinton was given a chance to take out OBL but didn't have the balls.  How that would have changed history.  I'm glad this guy is pink spray.  

You think you can have a discussion with these folks? Ask Jimmy Carter how well his Camp David accord worked.  Three years after Sadat was dead.  There will never be peace in the ME.  Anyone who says it can happen is delusional.

 

Of course, this caused no resentment or backlash:
 

mission.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, airdvr said:

Please...more of the old "its our fault" bullshit.  You forget...Clinton was given a chance to take out OBL but didn't have the balls.  How that would have changed history.  I'm glad this guy is pink spray.  

You think you can have a discussion with these folks? Ask Jimmy Carter how well his Camp David accord worked.  Three years after Sadat was dead.  There will never be peace in the ME.  Anyone who says it can happen is delusional.

 

Are you aware of US involvement (meddling) in Iran in the 20th century?

 

We overthrew a democratically elected government to install a brutal tyrant.

It's rather disgusting how the US is all about 'civil rights' and 'democracy' unless it is in another country. Then we seem to find the most brutal and oppressive dictator we can, and install them in charge. 

The US then supported the Shah for 4 decades, selling him all sorts of hardware and getting oil.

To pretend that the US doesn't 'own' at least some of the responsibility for the Iranians 'Death To America' attitude is pretty disingenuous. 
To pretend that Iran has no valid reasons to project power regionally is too.

 

And as far as the Camp David accords go, how many wars have Israel & Egypt had since then?

How many large scale wars has Israel been involved in since then?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sfzombie13 said:

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/?fbclid=IwAR1n7AL4HmKvKsROIw2k1wl7ma0Gv1uf1lYG_FDS_85KUn5_cjouHhVou7g

fixed it for ya.  nobody should ever be exposed to facebook, especially for information.

Absolutely correct, she seems to post to FuckedUpBook before she posts and sends the blog out. I didn't get it until after going to bed and had already caught the FB post.

Given the results of FB disinformation, elections coming up, and now a war, I'm troubled with what FB will put out. I think it's going to push social media away from what it is now, which should be a good thing in the long run.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dumped it two years ago but made a fake one to buy gear with.  got a rig for $500 so far, when i get both pilot chutes, both dbags, and risers i am gonna delete that one.  the stupid is strong on facebook.  the only chance we have this year is to make sure we get voters to the polls and hope they aren't fooled by the propaganda.  like either of those will happen though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

2 2