1 1
kallend

BAN GARLIC

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Uh, World War Two started in 1939 NOT 1941 and the Zimmerman telegram was sent in 1917, three years AFTER the beginning of World War One.  As I said "stay in your lane"

BTW thank you for the complement

Nice backpedal (well, not really, a rather lame attempt actually). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, brenthutch said:

I appreciate that.  I know that when you and BillV accuse me of backpedaling, it is tantamount to you knocking over your king.

I'm sorry, you've intentionally misundestood the post so you can falsely accuse him of not knowing when WW1/2 started and you're calling that checkmate?

 

What is wrong with you?

Edited by jakee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kallend implied capitalism was, at least tangentially, responsible for WW2, as if capitalism played  some nefarious role in the conflict.  If it weren't for American capitalism, he would be speaking German right now.  Soveign wealth, however acquired can be used for good or evil. (the nazis were socialists by the way)

I get where he is coming from, especially in light of the OP, he thinks; money and guns are inherently evil and they must be strictly controlled by the government and confiscated if need be.  He is just wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Kallend implied capitalism was, at least tangentially, responsible for WW2, as if capitalism played  some nefarious role in the conflict.  If it weren't for American capitalism, he would be speaking German right now.  Soveign wealth, however acquired can be used for good or evil. (the nazis were socialists by the way)

I get where he is coming from, especially in light of the OP, he thinks; money and guns are inherently evil and they must be strictly controlled by the government and confiscated if need be.  He is just wrong.

No, he clearly did not.

YOU are the one in the wrong.

Again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Kallend implied capitalism was, at least tangentially, responsible for WW2, as if capitalism played  some nefarious role in the conflict.  If it weren't for American capitalism, he would be speaking German right now.  

First, those two things are separate, and most definitely not mutually exclusive.

 

Second, that has nothing to do with you acting like a twat by falsely claiming Kallend doesn’t know when WW2 started and therefore you win at chess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left. Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists , particularly Jewish capitalists, of course. Their programs called for the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, and other major industries. They instituted and vigorously enforced a strict gun control regimen. They denounced Christians as right-wing fanatics. Yet a popular myth persists that the Nazis themselves were right-wing extremists. This insidious lie biases the entire political landscape today.

Edited by brenthutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

The Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left. Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists , particularly Jewish capitalists, of course. Their programs called for the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, and other major industries. They instituted and vigorously enforced a strict gun control regimen. They denounced Christians as right-wing fanatics. Yet a popular myth persists that the Nazis themselves were right-wing extremists. This insidious lie biases the entire political landscape today.

Oh I genuinely thought you were trolling on the other post and chuckled when I saw someone take the bait. And now you double-down on what is easily your dumbest take in months...jfc.

I reeeeeally hope this is just a clumsy attempt to maintain the troll, otherwise...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only half joking.  I really don't buy into the far left and the far right as being diametrically opposed. Lets look at what they have in common.

One party system (anti democratic)

The collective is more important than the individual

Promote revolutionary change

Planned economy

Use of violence, propaganda, secret police and the indoctrination of the youth.

Control of religion

Responsible for genocide, war, concentration camps and death on a massive scale

Any sober analysis would conclude they have more in common then we are lead to believe

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by brenthutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, normiss said:

Pay close attention to the "fueled by" part of that.

You. You're still wrong.

Again.

 

His comment that WW2 was "fueled by capitalism"  was no more inciteful than had he said "WW2, a conflict fueled by bread, potatoes and Spam"   Why did he bring up capitalism?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, brenthutch said:

 

His comment that WW2 was "fueled by capitalism"  was no more inciteful than had he said "WW2, a conflict fueled by bread, potatoes and Spam"   

I don’t think Spam has ever incited anything, apart from a Monty Python earworm.

 

Why did he bring up capitalism?

 

He didn’t. Capitalism had been under discussion for for several pages already. Maybe your question should be ‘why did he bring up WW2’ except the body of the post makes it plainly obvious. 

 

So how about you drop the transparent shit stirring now?

Edited by jakee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jakee said:

I don’t think Spam has ever incited anything, apart from a Monty Python earworm.

Nikita Khrushchev said that without Spam, the Soviet Union would have been unable to feed its army.  It would seem, at least far as the Soviets were concerned, Spam fueled WW2 more than capitalism. 

We all know that an army marches on its stomach, so that is where bread comes in.  As far as potatoes go, they were fermented and distilled to make ethanal for fuel for the V-2 missile.

Yes it is obvious that WW2 was fueled by bread, potatoes and Spam at least (and perhaps more) than it was by capitalism.  

Edited by brenthutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/1/2019 at 11:05 PM, normiss said:
On 8/1/2019 at 9:21 PM, Coreece said:

I can make do with shallots.

Slightly more bitter to me.

Ya, but beggars can't be choosers.  I've really noticed the bitterness when I over-cooked them once, much like garlic when it's even slightly burned.

Anyway, I'm only coming back here as a last resort to see if you or anyone else has  ideas for a restaurant-style Chinese stir-fry sauce - beef/broccoli/peppers/whatever, probably some garlic - not too gingery or sweet. (I'm not against using ginger/sweeter ingredients as long as it's not too sweet and overwhelming if you know what I mean)

I've tried everything but just can't seem to find the right mix - either too sweet or bitter.  I just can't seem to figure out the chinese-american secret to their cuisine.  Apparently it's well guarded against the inevitably destructive nature of excessively greedy American capitalism.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, however please note that any recipe calling for over 1Tbsp of soy sauce will be physically printed up and burned.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/1/2019 at 11:08 AM, brenthutch said:

BINGO!

So, let's say that it was legal to sell a drug in some states but not others, legal to use it in some method in some states but not others and illegal to abuse it in all.  Do you you think there would be an effective way for one state to do anything about breaking the laws regarding abuse of that substance?  You can't do much about point of use on a state level if you're not doing anything about point of sale on a national level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/19/2019 at 2:39 PM, Coreece said:

Ya, but beggars can't be choosers.  I've really noticed the bitterness when I over-cooked them once, much like garlic when it's even slightly burned.

Anyway, I'm only coming back here as a last resort to see if you or anyone else has  ideas for a restaurant-style Chinese stir-fry sauce - beef/broccoli/peppers/whatever, probably some garlic - not too gingery or sweet. (I'm not against using ginger/sweeter ingredients as long as it's not too sweet and overwhelming if you know what I mean)

I've tried everything but just can't seem to find the right mix - either too sweet or bitter.  I just can't seem to figure out the chinese-american secret to their cuisine.  Apparently it's well guarded against the inevitably destructive nature of excessively greedy American capitalism.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, however please note that any recipe calling for over 1Tbsp of soy sauce will be physically printed up and burned.

 

cut thru the BS with some  https://www.amazon.com/Gochujang-Korean-Chili-Sauce-7-5Oz/dp/B00OQGC20U/ref=asc_df_B00OQGC20U/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312193075834&hvpos=1o1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=7988114419382336244&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9008020&hvtargid=pla-569021466949&psc=1 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/12/2019 at 3:51 AM, nigel99 said:

You really think have armed civilians in Hong Kong would result in anything other than a total bloodbath?

i would be willing to bet that if the civilians started fighting back the big guns would come out. 

I really think that is the most naive fantasy land example. How well did it go for all the good old people in Waco Texas? They had the second amendment and used it...

You are siding with David Coresh?

The child molester?

THAT is your argument?

The second Amendment was not "used" correctly, (using your word)

Really?  That's your argument?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1