quade 3 #1 October 21, 2016 Can somebody help me out here and explain WTF is up in Montana? http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/20/498676414/montana-judge-faces-call-for-impeachment-after-incest-sentencingquade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,911 #2 October 21, 2016 quadeCan somebody help me out here and explain WTF is up in Montana? http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/20/498676414/montana-judge-faces-call-for-impeachment-after-incest-sentencing Simple. The judge, along with the rest of the victim's family values keeping the patriarch of the family in place over punishing him. What's hard to understand? Everyone involved probably thinks it is at least partly the victim's fault for being just so darn cute and easy to seduce. They all agree that it's wrong, but excusable, because God made men that way and sometimes they slip. And the judge is about to retire anyway. Otherwise he would never have had the guts.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crazydaisy315 0 #3 October 21, 2016 That was the part that floored me, the mother of the little girl and the grandmother specifically asked that he not be sent to prison. Lock him up, throw away the key, then fill the prison in with cement. No loss. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,911 #4 October 21, 2016 I'm going to get hate mail for this, but here goes. Many, possibly most families in this situation would beg for mercy and chose forgiveness over a 100 year sentence with a minimum of 25 years served. That penalty is excessive, and despite his crime he is a loved part of the family. On the other hand, the 60 days is completely inadequate. That is why this story is making international news. The fault lies not only with the judge, but with the rigid system imposed on him. There is plenty of room for disagreement on the appropriate sentence, but in my mind something in the range of 8 to 10 years with at least 5 served would be correct. Punishment and deterrence must both be part of sentencing. The sentence given does not do either of these principles justice.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TriGirl 268 #5 October 21, 2016 gowlerk***Can somebody help me out here and explain WTF is up in Montana? http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/20/498676414/montana-judge-faces-call-for-impeachment-after-incest-sentencing Simple. The judge, along with the rest of the victim's family values keeping the patriarch of the family in place over punishing him. What's hard to understand? Everyone involved probably thinks it is at least partly the victim's fault for being just so darn cute and easy to seduce. According to the judge, one factor in his determination was that the victim didn't testify (or an advocate for the victim). So the victim's mother and grandmother chose to advocate for the "welfare" of the two boys over standing up for their daughter/granddaughter. WTF?? We're putting the onus on a 12-year-old (possibly 13 by this time) girl to get up in front of all the adults who have proven they are not on her side and testify?? There should be a petition to remove the girl from that home, since it's obvious she isn't safe there.See the upside, and always wear your parachute! -- Christopher Titus Shut Up & Jump! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,122 #6 October 21, 2016 TriGirl******Can somebody help me out here and explain WTF is up in Montana? http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/20/498676414/montana-judge-faces-call-for-impeachment-after-incest-sentencing Simple. The judge, along with the rest of the victim's family values keeping the patriarch of the family in place over punishing him. What's hard to understand? Everyone involved probably thinks it is at least partly the victim's fault for being just so darn cute and easy to seduce. According to the judge, one factor in his determination was that the victim didn't testify (or an advocate for the victim). So the victim's mother and grandmother chose to advocate for the "welfare" of the two boys over standing up for their daughter/granddaughter. WTF?? We're putting the onus on a 12-year-old (possibly 13 by this time) girl to get up in front of all the adults who have proven they are not on her side and testify?? There should be a petition to remove the girl from that home, since it's obvious she isn't safe there. This, a thousand times this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #7 October 21, 2016 gowlerk I'm going to get hate mail for this, but here goes. Many, possibly most families in this situation would beg for mercy and chose forgiveness over a 100 year sentence with a minimum of 25 years served. That penalty is excessive, and despite his crime he is a loved part of the family. On the other hand, the 60 days is completely inadequate. That is why this story is making international news. The fault lies not only with the judge, but with the rigid system imposed on him. ..... Dude..... Fuck you.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,911 #8 October 21, 2016 TriGirl******Can somebody help me out here and explain WTF is up in Montana? http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/20/498676414/montana-judge-faces-call-for-impeachment-after-incest-sentencing Simple. The judge, along with the rest of the victim's family values keeping the patriarch of the family in place over punishing him. What's hard to understand? Everyone involved probably thinks it is at least partly the victim's fault for being just so darn cute and easy to seduce. According to the judge, one factor in his determination was that the victim didn't testify (or an advocate for the victim). So the victim's mother and grandmother chose to advocate for the "welfare" of the two boys over standing up for their daughter/granddaughter. WTF?? We're putting the onus on a 12-year-old (possibly 13 by this time) girl to get up in front of all the adults who have proven they are not on her side and testify?? There should be a petition to remove the girl from that home, since it's obvious she isn't safe there. It is quite possible, even likely, that the reason she did not testify is pressure from her family. The possibility of a 100 year sentence would put her under an enormous burden.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BartsDaddy 4 #9 October 22, 2016 It's also posible they wanted him free, so in a litle while he will disappear. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #10 October 22, 2016 BartsDaddyIt's also posible they wanted him free, so in a litle while he will disappear. I think it's more than a little tin-foil hat to think the family and judge colluded to give him a ludicrously short sentence just so they can kill him when he gets out.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,048 #11 October 22, 2016 Hi Paul, Quote Montana incest/rape case And just the opposite here in Oregon: http://www.oregonlive.com/washingtoncounty/index.ssf/2016/10/higher_court_calls_judge_vindi.html Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites