0
ryoder

SCOTUS Unanimous in Support of Stun-Gun Rights

Recommended Posts

Coreeece



Now if only we could blast non-lethal bolts of lightning from a distance.



They changed that years ago from "non-lethal" to the more accurate "less lethal." I made some good coin shorting TASR back when it was coming to light that they could be lethal, and were being used in situations where they were not required/called for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
headoverheels

***

Now if only we could blast non-lethal bolts of lightning from a distance.



They changed that years ago from "non-lethal" to the more accurate "less lethal." I made some good coin shorting TASR back when it was coming to light that they could be lethal, and were being used in situations where they were not required/called for.

Ok, but had I said "less lethal," it would've given the impression that I was referring to something less lethal than the OP's stun gun - and I wasn't talking about something less lethal than a OP's stun gun - I was talking about fucking lightning bolts.
Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryoder


Well, it's official. A stun gun is a gun, so if they ban all other firearms, it does not violate your second amendment rights.
"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jgoose71


Well, it's official. A stun gun is a gun, so if they ban all other firearms, it does not violate your second amendment rights.

Not sure I fully understand what you are trying to say here. Are you suggesting SCOTUS unanimously decided so that when guns are banned stun-guns are banned as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker


Well, it's official. A stun gun is a gun, so if they ban all other firearms, it does not violate your second amendment rights.

Not sure I fully understand what you are trying to say here. Are you suggesting SCOTUS unanimously decided so that when guns are banned stun-guns are banned as well?

Nah - I think what you are seeing is the world's most idiotic straw man.
Never try to eat more than you can lift

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0