brenthutch 383 #1 February 5, 2016 She says she will look into it what say you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #2 February 5, 2016 Your title makes my head hurt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #3 February 5, 2016 normissYour title makes my head hurt. reely? wye du ewe sae thaet yer hed herts? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 256 #4 February 5, 2016 Pai attenshun in skool kids.Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #5 February 5, 2016 normissYour title makes my head hurt. it's not too bad... there's an e where there should be an a and vice-versa. but yeah...-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #6 February 5, 2016 Hillary Clinton should be in prison. The US Justice Department thought nothing about bringing felony charges against General David Patraeus for unauthorized removal and retention of classified information and yet do nothing regarding the security breeches Clinton has done when she used classified information on her own private email server that used only basic encryption techniques any hacker in training knows how to bridge and then lied about it. What Patreus did was wrong. But what Clinton did is an order of magnitude more dangerous. Patreus did not put lives at risk. Clinton has. But fear not. There is no way in hell US Justice Department would ever dream of charging Billary because not only would Clinton's neck be on the line, the spiderweb of the people who knew about Clinton's activities reaches deep into all levels of the Obama Administration. Is there any wonder why stories such as this are becoming more prevalent in the news thanks to Clinton's security breeches. I have nothing against the average American citizen. But your government is pure evil and the corruption is beyond belief. When you look at who is still in the running to be the POTUS for the next 4 years you have to do perpetual face palms. Billary Clinton ... is a criminal Bernie Sanders ... is clueless Donald Trump ... is a jackass Ted Cruz ... is an asshole This is a long video. But it just keeps getting better and better if you are not afraid to learn about the facts of how deep and dangerous Clinton's classified security breeches go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl4RQg4Qfg0 But I can't critic you Yanks too much. My own country (Canada) elected a pure idiot as PM who says "Ugh" every 5th word that comes out of his empty head all because of his last name, his purdy hair and his superior skills as the world's greatest selfie taker. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #7 February 5, 2016 CanuckInUSA Hillary Clinton ... is a criminal Bernie Sanders ... is clueless Donald Trump ... is a jackass Ted Cruz ... is an asshole I approve of this summary ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #8 February 5, 2016 I said no. At this point it doesn't really matter. She is sticking to her story that she is an outsider because she has ovaries, and it doesn't matter how far in bed she has crawled with the wall street crowd. Also, she has been in the public so much over the last decade that people have already made up their mind on her. At this point releasing the transcripts won't change much. Me personally, I already know she is an insider establishment tool of the status quo."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,122 #9 February 5, 2016 Quotean insider establishment tool of the status quo What does that even mean? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #10 February 5, 2016 >>an insider establishment tool of the status quo >What does that even mean? "I don't like her." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #11 February 5, 2016 SkyDekkerQuotean insider establishment tool of the status quo What does that even mean? It means for sale to the highest bidder, just like when she was in the state department."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,122 #12 February 5, 2016 jgoose71***Quotean insider establishment tool of the status quo What does that even mean? It means for sale to the highest bidder, just like when she was in the state department. Aren't pretty much all politicians? Hard to run an election campaign without contributions, unless you want to "invest" $1 billion of your own money. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #13 February 5, 2016 +1We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #14 February 5, 2016 SkyDekker Aren't pretty much all politicians? Hard to run an election campaign without contributions, unless you want to "invest" $1 billion of your own money. We are not talking campaign contributions, we are talking straight up bribery. For a measly $1.5 million dollar donation to the Clinton foundation or the Clinton Global Initiative, you to could get a favorable ruling out of the Clinton state department.... Of course, once she is president, the price will go up. "But the money is not going to her, it's going to Bill who is running the foundation." You say.... Riiiiiiiight............."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,623 #15 February 5, 2016 www.cnn.com/2016/02/04/politics/hillary-clinton-email-classified-colin-powell-condoleezza-rice/... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,122 #16 February 5, 2016 QuoteFor a measly $1.5 million dollar donation to the Clinton foundation or the Clinton Global Initiative, you to could get a favorable ruling out of the Clinton state department.... I haven't read anything about this, other than the usual biased innuendo without proof. One was a list trying to tie country donations to their foundation and weapons sales. Do you have anything concrete? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #17 February 6, 2016 What sort of "ruling" does the state department give/make/issue? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
johnhking1 70 #18 February 6, 2016 If you tell a lie and get away with it, it makes it easier to do it again. If you believe what you hear and read, Hillary has been getting away with that for years. Brian Williams got canned (suspended) from NBC for exaggerating a couple stories on a late night talk show. I guess we hold our news anchors to higher standards than our presidential candidates. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewGuy2005 51 #19 February 6, 2016 kallend www.cnn.com/2016/02/04/politics/hillary-clinton-email-classified-colin-powell-condoleezza-rice/ Racist!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #20 February 6, 2016 SkyDekkerQuoteFor a measly $1.5 million dollar donation to the Clinton foundation or the Clinton Global Initiative, you to could get a favorable ruling out of the Clinton state department.... I haven't read anything about this, other than the usual biased innuendo without proof. One was a list trying to tie country donations to their foundation and weapons sales. Do you have anything concrete? There was an entire book laying out all the corruption called "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer. It detailed how after Bill was hired to speak at events, there would be large contributions to one of the Clinton funds. When Hillary was in the state department, payments went in, and there would be favorable rulings to said donor countries like Saudi Arabia and others. You don't remember the big up roar when CNN anchor George Stephamopoulus (SP?) interviewed Peter Schweizer about the book? He basically called Peter I liar and then it was discovered that he donated $75,000 to the Clintons. His credibility as a serious journalist was severely questioned after that. Anyway, since Hillary's e-mail scandal, the FBI has also decided to expanded their investigations to include federal corruption charges because of these events. They haven't said what they have or haven't found, just that they there was something that made them want to expand their investigation. Must have been something interesting.... The wikj-pedia link about the book. Keeping investigating past this, if you dare..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Cash"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,048 #21 February 6, 2016 Hi brent, Quotewhat say you Just to be fair; Mitt Romney refused to release his tax returns. I doubt that it cost him even one vote. Just to be fair, you know, Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #22 February 6, 2016 Quote This is a long video. But it just keeps getting better and better if you are not afraid to learn about the facts of how deep and dangerous Clinton's classified security breeches go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl4RQg4Qfg0 I just watched this whole video. Stunned... It's not only her, but Kerry and Obama as well.We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,121 #23 February 7, 2016 If only liberals are attacked, then it's partisan. Period. That works if only conservatives are attacked, as well. The only case where that's likely to be less true is if you're talking policy -- liberals will be attacked for positions that conservatives will be lauded for, and vice versa. But neither group is all in favor of cheating. Individuals, and groups, will engage in it. But it's really not an overall characteristic of that many people. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #24 February 7, 2016 wmw999If only liberals are attacked, then it's partisan. Period. That works if only conservatives are attacked, as well. The only case where that's likely to be less true is if you're talking policy -- liberals will be attacked for positions that conservatives will be lauded for, and vice versa. But neither group is all in favor of cheating. Individuals, and groups, will engage in it. But it's really not an overall characteristic of that many people. Wendy P. Would you say the Clintons have shown a propensity for cheating? (No - I am not including Chelsey)I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #25 February 8, 2016 JerryBaumchenHi brent, Quotewhat say you Just to be fair; Mitt Romney refused to release his tax returns. I doubt that it cost him even one vote. Just to be fair, you know, Jerry Baumchen Cost him the election. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
