2015 sets new record for warming

[billvon 2,739]

>So you are equating global warming to impending death.

Either you have intentional misunderstanding down to an art or you could give RushMC a run for his money.

[gunsmokex 1]

Here is George Carlin's view on global warming among other things. He hits the nail right on the head.

No matter if you agree or disagree its still a great laugh! George Carlin was one of the greats. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0aFPXr4n4

[kallend 1,827]

January 2016 - hottest on record
www.iflscience.com/environment/january-2016-was-hottest-record-world-continues-warm

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[billvon 2,739]

>January 2016 - hottest on record

Yeah, yeah. I bet by next year climate change "scientists" will be forced to admit that they are wrong and that Jan 2017 is really the hottest January on record. Honestly, you believe people who can lie like that?

In any case, temperatures hit 98 degrees here last Tuesday. And everyone was saying "oh, it's climate change, we are all going to die." But then it got cooler. Today it was cloudy and it only hit 68 degrees. You hear that, Al Gore? 68 is LESS than 98! Maybe you should learn some MATH before you open your big fat ugly mouth again!

[rushmc 18]

billvon

>January 2016 - hottest on record

Yeah, yeah. I bet by next year climate change "scientists" will be forced to admit that they are wrong and that Jan 2017 is really the hottest January on record. Honestly, you believe people who can lie like that?

In any case, temperatures hit 98 degrees here last Tuesday. And everyone was saying "oh, it's climate change, we are all going to die." But then it got cooler. Today it was cloudy and it only hit 68 degrees. You hear that, Al Gore? 68 is LESS than 98! Maybe you should learn some MATH before you open your big fat ugly mouth again!

Yep

And gas hit a $1.49 here

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 18]

Here is a good article on the measuring systems you are so happy with

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/17/how-not-to-measure-temperature-or-climate-change-96/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[turtlespeed 212]

rushmc

Here is a good article on the measuring systems you are so happy with

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/17/how-not-to-measure-temperature-or-climate-change-96/

It's not one of his trusted websites. He won't even bother.

Not that his trusted websites would publish anything like that, ever, no matter how true it is.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[gowlerk 2,103]

rushmc

Here is a good article on the measuring systems you are so happy with

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/17/how-not-to-measure-temperature-or-climate-change-96/

Come on man. We've been though this. Glaciers and sea ice are retreating, CO2 levels are increasing. The facts are in. So can we please get on with arguing/discussing what and even if we should try to do something about it?

Please, make an effort to be relevant.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[rushmc 18]

turtlespeed

***Here is a good article on the measuring systems you are so happy with

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/17/how-not-to-measure-temperature-or-climate-change-96/

It's not one of his trusted websites. He won't even bother.

Not that his trusted websites would publish anything like that, ever, no matter how true it is.

Posts like that are not for billvon or gowlerk
They have closed their minds to all new studies

Like this one

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/21/another-blob-of-warm-ocean-water-discovered-this-one-ancient/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[gowlerk 2,103]

Quote

Posts like that are not for billvon or gowlerk
They have closed their minds to all new studies

That's because these posts all have links to opinion pages. I get my science information from science pages. Do you ever read science pages?

Try reading here:

http://discovermagazine.com/tags/climate-change

It's not a scientific journal, it's Discovery magazine. Pop science, but science focused instead of politics focused like the stuff you post.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[rushmc 18]

Ahhhhhhh, the last link was about an article in a scientific magazine. it's listed if you care to read

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[gowlerk 2,103]

rushmc

Ahhhhhhh, the last link was about an article in a scientific magazine. it's listed if you care to read

The last link I see from you is from wattsup. That is an opinion blog, not a science site.

I'll ask once more. Do you ever trouble yourself with reading science from science sites? Or are you happy to just get pseudo information from blogs with an agenda and post them here? Do you really feel you are triumphing somehow every time you find more of the junk to link to?

Really, you are not even in the game.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[rushmc 18]

gowlerk

***Ahhhhhhh, the last link was about an article in a scientific magazine. it's listed if you care to read

The last link I see from you is from wattsup. That is an opinion blog, not a science site.[/quote]


You have never been to the site have you

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 1,827]

gowlerk

***Ahhhhhhh, the last link was about an article in a scientific magazine. it's listed if you care to read

The last link I see from you is from wattsup. That is an opinion blog, not a science site.

I'll ask once more. Do you ever trouble yourself with reading science from science sites? Or are you happy to just get pseudo information from blogs with an agenda and post them here? Do you really feel you are triumphing somehow every time you find more of the junk to link to?

Really, you are not even in the game.

I don't think he knows the difference. His salary depends on his not knowing. 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.'

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[normiss 726]

No, actually it was not that.
Not even close as it is an opinion piece from an uneducated blogger.
He doesn't even understand science enough to dispute any of it, it's simply ALL opinion.

[gowlerk 2,103]

Quote

You have never been to the site have you

I was just there. It's a climate change denial blog run buy a guy who used to be a TV weatherman. That is the extent of his training. In other words, he is an entertainer. He likely found a way to cash in on BS and make money easier that doing TV.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_Up_With_That%3F

Quote

Education and career

Watts assisted with the setup of a radio program for his high school in Indiana,[14] and later attended electrical engineering and meteorology classes at Purdue University, but did not graduate or receive a degree.[2][15] In 1978, Watts began his broadcasting career as an on-air meteorologist for WLFI-TV in Lafayette, Indiana.[3]

He joined KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California in 1987,[2][3] and founded a company named ItWorks the same year.[16] He stopped using his first name "Willard" to avoid confusion with NBC's Today weatherman Willard Scott.[3] In 2002, he left KHSL to focus on ITWorks full-time.[17] Watts has been the chief meteorologist for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate based in Chico, California since 2004,[2] and the director and president of IntelliWeather Inc, a subsidiary of ItWorks,[16] since 2000.[citation needed]

Watts was a member of the Chico, California school board from 2002 to 2006.[18] In 2006, he was briefly a candidate for county supervisor, to represent Chico on the Butte County Board of Supervisors, but withdrew his candidacy due to family and workload concerns.[19]

It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site. And is also not relevant. Not in the game. Dead enders who time has long ago passed by.

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

[billvon 2,739]

>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

[rushmc 18]

billvon

>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

You have not been there either

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 1,827]

rushmc

***>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

You have not been there either

QED.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[kallend 1,827]

billvon

>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

And it has a certain truthiness about it. Rather like Trump's statements but not so entertaining.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[kallend 1,827]

rushmc

***>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

You have not been there either

Just like you haven't been to the National Academy of Sciences (Hint, it's not some ex-weatherman's blog):

www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/02/17/1517056113

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 18]

kallend

******>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

You have not been there either

Just like you haven't been to the National Academy of Sciences (Hint, it's not some ex-weatherman's blog):

www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/02/17/1517056113

Well well
You admitted you have not been to the site yet you bash it off handedly

Nicely done sire

Biggest issue with you alarmists is you can stand debate

Now, please refer back to your 97% of scientists fantasy line so we can all have a good laugh

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 1,827]

rushmc

*********>It is not a science site, it's an agenda driven site.

But it's science-y! It looks like science but without all the troubling fact-checking, annoying peer review and all those nerdy, loser formulas. It has proven to be much easier to digest for people with predetermined political agendas.

You have not been there either

Just like you haven't been to the National Academy of Sciences (Hint, it's not some ex-weatherman's blog):

www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/02/17/1517056113

Well well
You admitted you have not been to the site yet you bash it off handedly



Wrong again.

Quote

Nicely done sire

Biggest issue with you alarmists is you can stand debate

Now, please refer back to your 97% of scientists fantasy line so we can all have a good laugh

Has that company that pays your salary cut back on the millions of tons of CO2 it admitted to spewing into the atmosphere each year?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[SkyDekker 1,294]

Quote

Biggest issue with you alarmists is you can stand debate

It is not often you are right, but every once in a while...

[rushmc 18]

CO2 is not a pollutant
And you are a rabid alarmist

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln