0
rushmc

Oh oh. Hillary Campaign has more problems coming?

Recommended Posts

Courtesy of Project Veritas?

http://time.com/4010778/hillary-clinton-sting-project-veritas/

I read this (and watched the video) on another favorites sight.
But since time first reported it, I used Time

Enjoy
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

Courtesy of Project Veritas?

http://time.com/4010778/hillary-clinton-sting-project-veritas/

I read this (and watched the video) on another favorites sight.
But since time first reported it, I used Time

Enjoy



According to your link:

"Nothing in the video shows the Clinton campaign violating the law, or the campaign’s own policy. "

Dog bites man story... Much ado about nothing.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


This approach to training volunteers is standard operating procedure across field campaigns, according to a Republican field staffer, who requested anonymity.



Do you actually READ any of this stuff before you start frothing at the mouth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OMIGOD!!! Another scandal. impeach the president....jail everyone!

wow you are really reaching. people asking people to register to vote. especially is they are not republicans....I mean how 'communist and unpatriotic' can you get?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

OMIGOD!!! Another scandal. impeach the president....jail everyone!

wow you are really reaching. people asking people to register to vote. especially is they are not republicans....I mean how 'communist and unpatriotic' can you get?



No, they are only registering those who support Hillary

This goes against Federal law

But I expect such over reaction from you anymore....
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

This goes against Federal law



so does republican redistricting to make sure that minority candidates still get elected. But you show no outrage over that.

So does starting wars for profit. but you show no outrage over that.

and so on and so on and so on and you are so predictable with you selective view of the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

Quote

This goes against Federal law



so does republican redistricting to make sure that minority candidates still get elected. But you show no outrage over that.

So does starting wars for profit. but you show no outrage over that.

and so on and so on and so on and you are so predictable with you selective view of the world.


Your world view is so damned funny all I can do it laugh about it

But, in your world, I suppose your really believe all that you just posted

In the end, I do not need to be outraged about anything cause you are so damned mad at everything. Enogh so you have enough outrage for all of us

Even if it is to terribelly misguided[:/]
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

A video is the least of her worries. She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



Exactly

This is just another one on the list
But it is further away from her for the most part
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

***A video is the least of her worries. She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



Exactly

This is just another one on the list
But it is further away from her for the most part

And then there's Biden, who she's rumored to be trying to dissuade from running. :ph34r:
There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

***OMIGOD!!! Another scandal. impeach the president....jail everyone!

wow you are really reaching. people asking people to register to vote. especially is they are not republicans....I mean how 'communist and unpatriotic' can you get?



No, they are only registering those who support Hillary

This goes against Federal law

.

According to your link:

"Nothing in the video shows the Clinton campaign violating the law, or the campaign’s own policy. "

So you are contradicting yourself yet again.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yoink


Quote


This approach to training volunteers is standard operating procedure across field campaigns, according to a Republican field staffer, who requested anonymity.



Do you actually READ any of this stuff before you start frothing at the mouth?



It's pretty clear that he doesn't.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

Courtesy of Project Veritas



Project Veritas is run by James O'Keefe, a former Breitbart writer.

O'Keefe has been accused of selectively editing and manipulating tapes, and distorting chronologies. Several journalists have expressed regret for not scrutinizing his work. In the summer of 2011, he began releasing videos of his colleagues' staged encounters with workers which he claimed showed fraud related to Medicaid applicability. Further examination concluded there was no fraud or intent to commit fraud.

In 2013 O'Keefe agreed to pay $100,000 to former California ACORN employee Juan Carlos Vera for deliberately misrepresenting Mr. Vera's actions. On the basis of selectively edited videotape which O'Keefe released, Vera appeared to be a willing participant in helping O'Keefe smuggle young women into the United States illegally. However, authorities confirmed that Mr. Vera immediately contacted the them about O'Keefe and had actually been encouraging O'Keefe to share as much as possible about his scheme so as to have him arrested and convicted for human trafficking. Due to O'Keefe's releasing the video without doing any journalistic legwork, Mr. Vera lost his job and was falsely accused of being engaged in human trafficking.


Etc. etc. etc.

Project Veritas deliberately lies and misrepresents. A perfect source for rushmc's rants.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see


A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.
Just listen to her meticulous parsing. She sounds like her husband: " it depends on what your definition of "is" is" and "I never had sexual relations with that women, Ms Lewinsky".

"I never sent or received any classified information" became "I never KNOWINGLY sent or received classified information" became "I never knowingly sent anything MARKED classified"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

***

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see


A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.

Only because he received a pre-emptive pardon. You don't need a pardon if you've not committed a crime.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4696
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

******

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see

A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.

Only because he received a pre-emptive pardon. You don't need a pardon if you've not committed a crime.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4696

Nor does a person get executed who hasn't committed a crime, right?

Beware speaking in absolutes. Always. ;)


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawrocket

*********

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see

A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.

Only because he received a pre-emptive pardon. You don't need a pardon if you've not committed a crime.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4696

Nor does a person get executed who hasn't committed a crime, right?

Beware speaking in absolutes. Always. ;)

Bogus comparison.

Explain why a pardon is NEEDED if you've not done anything that needs pardoning.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

************

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see

A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.

Only because he received a pre-emptive pardon. You don't need a pardon if you've not committed a crime.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4696

Nor does a person get executed who hasn't committed a crime, right?

Beware speaking in absolutes. Always. ;)

Bogus comparison.

Explain why a pardon is NEEDED if you've not done anything that needs pardoning.


Explain this.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OK2AQ20150604


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawrocket

***************

Quote

She has an alphabet soup of real troubles; FBI, IG, DOJ and none of them have anything to do with the "vast right wing conspiracy".



My $100 says not a single criminal charge ever comes out of any of these agencies regarding anything to do with the Clintons.

Not ever. So if you are so correct, cough up your hundred dollar handshake and we will see

A low bar my friend. Nixon was never charged with a crime.

Only because he received a pre-emptive pardon. You don't need a pardon if you've not committed a crime.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4696

Nor does a person get executed who hasn't committed a crime, right?

Beware speaking in absolutes. Always. ;)

Bogus comparison.

Explain why a pardon is NEEDED if you've not done anything that needs pardoning.


Explain this.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OK2AQ20150604

Easy - Unlike Nixon (" Nixon was never charged with a crime."; brenthutch) they had already been charged, tried, convicted and imprisoned despite being innocent.

Yet another BOGUS comparison from the lawyer.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0