0
kallend

Another data point.

Recommended Posts

Not only that the FBI or anyone can not calculate the number of times a gun actually saved someone via actual use or just the physical presence it brought about. Remember their argument about how there is no mandatory shooting report that is filed with the FBI so we never know how many people are shot. Also no one knows or reports when a thug walked into a gas station to rob it, and saw a cop, or open carrier, or someone they might have thought was armed, and decided not to rob the store. That right there makes his argument shit.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sfzombie13


this happened not too far from me. i saw some pictures of the suspect's gun, the phamicist's first shot hit the gun and disabled it. almost old west style, except it didn't fly out of his hand and he got killed by the next one. it was a facebook picture, i wish i could find it.


Awwe, that poor robber. They shouldn't have shot him, they should have just given him the money and drugs, and maybe a backrub, and then a foot massage.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TomWatson

***Data from the FBI show conclusively that gun ownership increases the likelihood that you will be shot.



Lack of a reference allowing independent verification renders your statement worthless.

Asked and answered previously (many times).

You're new here, aren't you?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

************Data show that gun ownership does not confer greater safety.



Another data point. Data show that gun ownership does confer greater safety.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d5c_1424394365

The plural of anecdote is NOT data.

Funny reply. I copied your own words from your earlier post. So you're just criticizing yourself. Ha!

No. Poor comprehension on your part.

Data from the FBI show conclusively that gun ownership increases the likelihood that you will be shot. Your anecdote was another datum but didn't change the result. Gun ownership does NOT confer greater safety.

Why not just write that data from the FBI show that gun ownership increases the likelihood that you will get shot? If you have to write "conclusively" then the data doesn't speak for itself.

While we're at it, let's have the NSA produce data that show conclusively that it's data collection process saves lives.

Gun ownership in the US is like voting. It's a right that plenty of people choose not to exercise. And also a right that is frequently exercised foolishly and without rationL thought.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0