Stumpy 284 #1 February 11, 2015 Come on - you have bigger problems than tight clothing. How about everyone wears a Burqa - would that be OK? http://mashable.com/2015/02/11/montana-legislator-yoga-pants-illegal/Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 1 #2 February 11, 2015 He seems to have quite a hard-on about this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #3 February 11, 2015 Dude needs to get a fucking grip. 1) Obviously hates men. 2) Obviously has never read the Constitution.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomWatson 0 #4 February 11, 2015 Doc Moore's web page: http://leg.mt.gov/css/Sessions/63rd/leg_info.asp?HouseID=1&SessionID=107&LAWSID=15262 (with contact info...) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,789 #5 February 11, 2015 "Under current Montana law, a three-time violator of state public nudity laws could face a life sentence." Capital punishment is clearly indicated in this case. Or does Montana want to coddle criminals? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,789 #6 February 11, 2015 "Moore's proposal, though it would expand the definition of indecent exposure, would lessen that sentence to a maximum of five years in jail and a $5,000 fine, apparently to promote its passage." Commie criminal coddlers! ============================= He stopped me right there and said, "Kid, I want you to go over and sit down On that bench that says 'Group W'." And I walked over to the bench there, and there's - Group W is where they put you if you may not be moral enough to join the army after committin' your special crime. There was all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly-lookin' people on the bench there . . . there was mother-rapers . . . father-stabbers . . . father-rapers! FATHER-RAPERS sittin' right there on the bench next to me! And they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible and crime fightin' guys were sittin' there on the bench, and the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one . . . the meanest father-raper of them all . . . was comin' over to me, and he was mean and ugly and nasty and horrible and all kinds of things, and he sat down next to me. He said, "Kid, what'd you get?" I said, "I didn't get nothin'. I had to pay a five thousand dollar fine." He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" and I said, "Wearin yoga pants" . . . . And they all moved away from me on the bench there, with the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean, nasty things, till I said, "And creatin' a nuisance . . . " And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench talkin' about crime, mother-stabbin', father-rapin', . . . all kinds of groovy things that we was talkin' about on the bench, and everything was fine. ========================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,871 #7 February 12, 2015 billvon"Moore's proposal, though it would expand the definition of indecent exposure, would lessen that sentence to a maximum of five years in jail and a $5,000 fine, apparently to promote its passage." Commie criminal coddlers! ============================= He stopped me right there and said, "Kid, I want you to go over and sit down On that bench that says 'Group W'." And I walked over to the bench there, and there's - Group W is where they put you if you may not be moral enough to join the army after committin' your special crime. There was all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly-lookin' people on the bench there . . . there was mother-rapers . . . father-stabbers . . . father-rapers! FATHER-RAPERS sittin' right there on the bench next to me! And they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible and crime fightin' guys were sittin' there on the bench, and the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one . . . the meanest father-raper of them all . . . was comin' over to me, and he was mean and ugly and nasty and horrible and all kinds of things, and he sat down next to me. He said, "Kid, what'd you get?" I said, "I didn't get nothin'. I had to pay a five thousand dollar fine." He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" and I said, "Wearin yoga pants" . . . . And they all moved away from me on the bench there, with the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean, nasty things, till I said, "And creatin' a nuisance . . . " And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench talkin' about crime, mother-stabbin', father-rapin', . . . all kinds of groovy things that we was talkin' about on the bench, and everything was fine. ========================== Especially if you do it at Thanksgiving.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,589 #8 February 12, 2015 quade 1) Obviously hates men. He's a closet gay; And jealous of men looking at hot babes in yoga pants, instead of looking at him."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GD64 1 #9 February 12, 2015 He's just mad because there were no yoga pants in his size. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #10 February 13, 2015 I dunno, I might be on board if people above a certain body fat percentage were banned from wearing tights.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,485 #11 February 13, 2015 grue I dunno, I might be on board if people above a certain body fat percentage were banned from wearing tights. Well, back in the 80s, I would have been happy if they had banned spandex for people over a certain weight. And in the 90s, it would have been nice if "butt crack" jeans were only allowed on people who had "nice" butts. Yoga pants are the same. Heaven on the right body, hell on the wrong one. But (since this is SC), this is America, where we have the right to completely, totally and utterly deceive ourselves that "we look good in that." Besides, how would "People of WalMart" survive without them? "There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #12 February 13, 2015 grueI dunno, I might be on board if people above a certain body fat percentage were banned from wearing tights. Bill Engvall says there should be an application and screening process.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #13 February 13, 2015 turtlespeed ***I dunno, I might be on board if people above a certain body fat percentage were banned from wearing tights. Bill Engvall says there should be an application and screening process. He's right! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdkalou 0 #14 February 13, 2015 I knew it was coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,339 #15 February 13, 2015 Quote Besides, how would "People of WalMart" survive without them? This Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Niki1 1 #16 February 13, 2015 wolfriverjoe***I dunno, I might be on board if people above a certain body fat percentage were banned from wearing tights. Well, back in the 80s, I would have been happy if they had banned spandex for people over a certain weight. ] When the fall rate picked up and spandex jumpsuits came along in the '80s, Billy Weber said, "If you don't look good in spandex, you don't need spandex."Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossilbe before they were done. Louis D Brandeis Where are we going and why are we in this basket? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites