beowulf 1 #1 October 22, 2013 It was established Dec 23 1913. We are coming up to the 100 year anniversary. How did they do compared to the previous 100 years? Quote http://www.sovereignman.com/finance/check-out-the-feds-dismal-track-record-12924/ Check out the Fed's dismal track record As we’re coming up on the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Federal Reserve, one thing has become abundantly clear– these guys are horrible at their jobs. According to the popular lie, the Federal Reserve was supposed to have been established to smooth out the economic cycle, thus preventing booms, busts, recessions, and depressions. It hasn’t really worked out that way. In the 100 years prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there were 18 distinct recessions or depressions: 1815, 1822, 1825, 1828, 1833, 1836, 1839, 1845, 1847, 1853, 1860, 1865, 1869, 1873, 1887, 1890, 1899, and 1902. Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there have been 18 recessions or depressions: 1918, 1920, 1923, 1926, 1929, 1937, 1945, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1960, 1969, 1973, 1980, 1981, 1990, 2001, 2008. So in other words, the economy experienced just as many recessions with the ‘expert’ management of the Federal Reserve as without it. And this doesn’t even begin to capture all the absurd panics (the S&L scare), bailouts (Long-Term Capital Management), and ridiculous asset bubbles that they’ve created. Hardly an impressive enough track record to justify conjuring trillions of dollars out of thin air, and awarding nearly totalitarian control of the money supply and economy to a tiny banking elite… wouldn’t you say? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 186 #2 October 23, 2013 beowulfIt was established Dec 23 1913. We are coming up to the 100 year anniversary. How did they do compared to the previous 100 years? Quote http://www.sovereignman.com/finance/check-out-the-feds-dismal-track-record-12924/ Check out the Fed's dismal track record As we’re coming up on the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Federal Reserve, one thing has become abundantly clear– these guys are horrible at their jobs. According to the popular lie, the Federal Reserve was supposed to have been established to smooth out the economic cycle, thus preventing booms, busts, recessions, and depressions. It hasn’t really worked out that way. In the 100 years prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there were 18 distinct recessions or depressions: 1815, 1822, 1825, 1828, 1833, 1836, 1839, 1845, 1847, 1853, 1860, 1865, 1869, 1873, 1887, 1890, 1899, and 1902. Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there have been 18 recessions or depressions: 1918, 1920, 1923, 1926, 1929, 1937, 1945, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1960, 1969, 1973, 1980, 1981, 1990, 2001, 2008. So in other words, the economy experienced just as many recessions with the ‘expert’ management of the Federal Reserve as without it. And this doesn’t even begin to capture all the absurd panics (the S&L scare), bailouts (Long-Term Capital Management), and ridiculous asset bubbles that they’ve created. Hardly an impressive enough track record to justify conjuring trillions of dollars out of thin air, and awarding nearly totalitarian control of the money supply and economy to a tiny banking elite… wouldn’t you say? A more definitive misnomer never existed. The "Federal Reserve" is neither Federal nor a reserve. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #3 October 23, 2013 beowulfIt was established Dec 23 1913. We are coming up to the 100 year anniversary. How did they do compared to the previous 100 years? Quote http://www.sovereignman.com/finance/check-out-the-feds-dismal-track-record-12924/ Check out the Fed's dismal track record As we’re coming up on the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Federal Reserve, one thing has become abundantly clear– these guys are horrible at their jobs. According to the popular lie, the Federal Reserve was supposed to have been established to smooth out the economic cycle, thus preventing booms, busts, recessions, and depressions. It hasn’t really worked out that way. In the 100 years prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there were 18 distinct recessions or depressions: 1815, 1822, 1825, 1828, 1833, 1836, 1839, 1845, 1847, 1853, 1860, 1865, 1869, 1873, 1887, 1890, 1899, and 1902. Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, there have been 18 recessions or depressions: 1918, 1920, 1923, 1926, 1929, 1937, 1945, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1960, 1969, 1973, 1980, 1981, 1990, 2001, 2008. So in other words, the economy experienced just as many recessions with the ‘expert’ management of the Federal Reserve as without it. And this doesn’t even begin to capture all the absurd panics (the S&L scare), bailouts (Long-Term Capital Management), and ridiculous asset bubbles that they’ve created. Hardly an impressive enough track record to justify conjuring trillions of dollars out of thin air, and awarding nearly totalitarian control of the money supply and economy to a tiny banking elite… wouldn’t you say? John F Kennedy, a democrat, had no use for the Federal Reserve. This and his plan to get out of Vietnam may have cost him his life.http://john-f-kennedy.net/thefederalreserve.htmDo your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites