0
skypuppy

ny-gun-confiscation-underway-citizens-told-to-turn-in-pistol-owner-id-firearms/

Recommended Posts

kalend will be happy

http://gopthedailydose.com/2013/04/09/ny-gun-confiscation-underway-citizens-told-to-turn-in-pistol-owner-id-firearms/
If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead.
Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

kalend will be happy

http://gopthedailydose.com/2013/04/09/ny-gun-confiscation-underway-citizens-told-to-turn-in-pistol-owner-id-firearms/



Why do you say that? Has this "kalend" person ever proposed gun confiscation?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Why do you say that? Has this "kalend" person ever proposed gun confiscation?



That must have been the name of one of John's sock puppets.;)
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Those are the facts. Nothing more, nothing less.



Actually, those "facts" are missing quite a bit. Like how do we know "John Doe" isn't violent? His LAWYER says so, but his job is to defend his client, not necessarily tell the complete truth to random bloggers. Not only that, it would be a violation of client privilege to do so.

Let's see what comes actually out in court before assuming all is as it seems on this completely pro-gun blog.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A little more information an a link to the law in question: http://www.infowars.com/new-york-police-confiscating-firearms-from-people-takin-anti-anxiety-medication/

NY SAFE law is terrible law, though Kallend should be happy since constitutional rights are being ignored and/or trampled and people are being branded "nutter" without recourse or clear reasoning.

Mental Health Experts Worry New York Gun Laws May Discourage Proper Treatment
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You support removing guns and gun rights from this undefined class of people you call nutters. If we accept your premise, WHY STOP THERE?

ps - you have supported gun confiscation when you don't like the guns, classify people with perjoritive class names, putting up red tape barriers to ownership, and any other time you feel like it. Just because you haven't gone full-Feinstein* doesn't mean you don't support the practice.

* (the 51 votes quote) "Mr and Mrs America turn them all in"
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He seems to have acquired the properties of an interesting sub-set that only support individual rights when they feel like it.

Do you think state law enforcement should be trolling medical records looking for a reason to unilaterally restrict individual rights? As to medical profession reporting potential danger to self or others I don't have a problem, but why does NY SAFE need to expand it, and why doesn't it go through a judge?
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I anxiously await the list of prescription drugs that will vacate one's mental rights to weapons.

Cops come to your house on a domestic? No guns for you!
DUI?
Counseling of any kind?
Eye test?
IQ test?
We're going to need to see the inside of your house
interview your family and friends....

This is going to be an interesting journey ... buckle up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
text of the law

wiki article

Hoogle News for NY SAFE Act

Beyond that, I'm not sure what you're asking for, but if you'll be a little more specific and I'll see what I can do.

I don't have "a non-nutjob, preferably neutral source to link", but I didn't have one for Gunwalker or other stories at first either. Local news stations are staring to notice but don't have anything much, yet.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I anxiously await the list of prescription drugs that will vacate one's mental rights to weapons.

Cops come to your house on a domestic? No guns for you!
DUI?
Counseling of any kind?
Eye test?
IQ test?
We're going to need to see the inside of your house
interview your family and friends....

This is going to be an interesting journey ... buckle up.



As long as the general public doesn't care they'll keep adding on. Look what they did to airspace. Seventeen federal agencies including: fighter jets to patrol against single engine 30 year old pipers with some elderly pilot at the controls. It's a jobs work program for those who can't get through high school or pass an entrance exam or have arrest records and can't find work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Those are the facts. Nothing more, nothing less.



Actually, those "facts" are missing quite a bit. Like how do we know "John Doe" isn't violent? His LAWYER says so, but his job is to defend his client, not necessarily tell the complete truth to random bloggers. Not only that, it would be a violation of client privilege to do so.

Let's see what comes actually out in court before assuming all is as it seems on this completely pro-gun blog.


:D:D

Wow... talk about a hypocrite.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Do you have a non-nutjob, preferably neutral source to link us to?

(Then maybe, since you've been registered on here for 11 years, you can actually post it in a clickable link. But whatever.)



If it bothers you to have to copy and paste, feel free to not read the article. After all, that's what living in a democracy is all about.
If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead.
Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Do you have a non-nutjob, preferably neutral source to link us to?

(Then maybe, since you've been registered on here for 11 years, you can actually post it in a clickable link. But whatever.)



If it bothers you to have to copy and paste, feel free to not read the article. After all, that's what living in a democracy is all about.



Copy and paste THIS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You support removing guns and gun rights from this undefined class of people you call nutters. If we accept your premise, WHY STOP THERE?



Lame.

According to DC vs Heller, preventing the mentally ill and felons from having guns is NOT a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You support removing guns and gun rights from this undefined class of people you call nutters. If we accept your premise, WHY STOP THERE?



Lame.

According to DC vs Heller, preventing the mentally ill and felons from having guns is NOT a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.



Lame.

SCOTUS decided that the 14th amendment means they can't deny your your rights without due process and equal protection. Also, your emotional response and perjorative label doesn't mean you can violate constitutional rights.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

You support removing guns and gun rights from this undefined class of people you call nutters. If we accept your premise, WHY STOP THERE?



Lame.

According to DC vs Heller, preventing the mentally ill and felons from having guns is NOT a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.



Lame.

SCOTUS decided that the 14th amendment means they can't deny your your rights without due process and equal protection. Also, your emotional response and perjorative label doesn't mean you can violate constitutional rights.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.



So you didn't actually read Heller, then. OK.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Lame.

According to DC vs Heller, preventing the mentally ill and felons from having guns is NOT a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.



And outside of someone who has committed a crime, or someone found "mentally ill" through proper court proceedures... you (Nor Quade) can't define what mental illness is.

Cricles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles.

Circles...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I anxiously await the list of prescription drugs that will vacate one's mental rights to weapons.

One that makes driving impossible would be a good candidate.

>Cops come to your house on a domestic?

IF there is violence involved? Might be a very good idea. Could save some lives.

>DUI?

Felony DUI - yes. Consistent and serious alcohol abuse that results in multiple DUI's - probably.

>Eye test?

Lots of perfectly responsible gun owners wear glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Lame.

According to DC vs Heller, preventing the mentally ill and felons from having guns is NOT a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

Much as you may dislike it, the SCOTUS (and NOT YOU) decide these things.



And outside of someone who has committed a crime, or someone found "mentally ill" through proper court proceedures... you (Nor Quade) can't define what mental illness is.

Cricles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles.

Circles...



What is *cricles"?

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0