More on BHO & Benghazi

[RonD1120 58]

Hillary Clinton's incompetence and/or political maneuvering is being exposed. Is it time to get a real pussy in the WH?


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-obtained-judicial-watch-reveal-top-hillary-clinton-advisers-knew-immediately-assault-benghazi-armed-attack/

ETA

Quote

“These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s closest advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it happened,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she planted the false story about ‘inflammatory material being posted on the Internet.’ The contempt for the public’s right to know is evidenced not only in these documents but also in the fact that we had to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them. The Obama gang’s cover-up continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling of information. Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, and every other official in these emails under oath.”

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[turtlespeed 212]

RonD1120

Hillary Clinton's incompetence and/or political maneuvering is being exposed. Is it time to get a real pussy in the WH?


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-obtained-judicial-watch-reveal-top-hillary-clinton-advisers-knew-immediately-assault-benghazi-armed-attack/

ETA

Quote

“These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s closest advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it happened,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she planted the false story about ‘inflammatory material being posted on the Internet.’ The contempt for the public’s right to know is evidenced not only in these documents but also in the fact that we had to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them. The Obama gang’s cover-up continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling of information. Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, and every other official in these emails under oath.”

We all knew this - so really what difference at this point does it make anyway?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[DanG 1]

Yes, if you actually read Ron's link, we did all know this. What we knew, and what the State Department knew, was that the consulate was under attack, and a terrorist group claimed responsibility hours later. That's all these e-mails say, but that was never in dispute. All this latest "revelation" is, is the desperate attempt to keep the faithful pissed off about the Benghazi attack. People who want to see nefarious motives will grab onto any little piece of "new" information, regardless of what that information is.

- Dan G

[turtlespeed 212]

DanG

Yes, if you actually read Ron's link, we did all know this. What we knew, and what the State Department knew, was that the consulate was under attack, and a terrorist group claimed responsibility hours later. That's all these e-mails say, but that was never in dispute. All this latest "revelation" is, is the desperate attempt to keep the faithful pissed off about the Benghazi attack. People who want to see nefarious motives will grab onto any little piece of "new" information, regardless of what that information is.

Do you agree or disagree that they falsely proclaimed that the attack was a protest and occurred because of a youtube video?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[DanG 1]

I agree that is what they said. I haven't seen any evidence that they did not believe that at the time, or that they said it for nefarious means.

- Dan G

[turtlespeed 212]

DanG

I agree that is what they said. I haven't seen any evidence that they did not believe that at the time, or that they said it for nefarious means.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[DanG 1]

Quote

Your intellect is truly dizzying. Well said.

- Dan G

[funjumper101 15]

The "Morons on BHO and Benghazi" thread continues.

It is amazing that with the multiple investigations done by the best and the brightest the Reich Wing has to offer (Issa is an intellectual giant of our era, right up there with Hawking... NOT) they still haven't found a damn thing that match the Reich Wing media machine fantasies.

How many times does "There is nothing to our allegations" have to be said, and how many ways does it have to be phrased, before you can accept the truth?

The idiots that keep falling for the Reich Wing Conservetard stories are right up there with the birthers as far as being a sad example of just how STUPID some people are.

[RonD1120 58]

I am still waiting for you to man up and reveal when, where and under what circumstances you met me and what was said between us.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[rushmc 18]

RonD1120

I am still waiting for you to man up and reveal when, where and under what circumstances you met me and what was said between us.

Or woman up

think redhead

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[turtlespeed 212]

rushmc

***I am still waiting for you to man up and reveal when, where and under what circumstances you met me and what was said between us.

Or woman up

think redhead

Striper? or even Stripper?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[RonD1120 58]

I am still confused. I cannot place funjumper101 or Amazon. If that is the poster you mean

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[cvfd1399 0]

So when bush gets bad information from his intel network hes a liar.

When Obama/Hilary purposely lie about the reason for an attack its something we all knew, whats the big deal.

You call people stupid, but here are the facts.

Attack happened at 3:40PM
A security agent at the Benghazi compound hears “loud noises” coming from the front gate and “gunfire and an explosion.” A senior State Department official at the Oct. 9 briefing says that “the camera on the main gate reveals a large number of people – a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound.”

State department told them it was a terrorist attack
6:07 p.m.: The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts. (The existence of the email was not disclosed until Reuters reported it on Oct. 24.)

Clinton blamed video at 10:00 PM
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issues a statement confirming that one State official was killed in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. Her statement, which MSNBC posted at 10:32 p.m., made reference to the anti-Muslim video.

The next day she blames the video again
Clinton delivers a speech at the State Department to condemn the attack in Benghazi and to praise the victims as “heroes.” She again makes reference to the anti-Muslim video in similar language.

Two days after she blames the video again.
Unfortunately, however, over the last 24 hours, we have also seen violence spread elsewhere. Some seek to justify this behavior as a response to inflammatory, despicable material posted on the Internet. As I said earlier today, the United States rejects both the content and the message of that video.

This shit show goes on and the proof is shown in the link below, but when it comes down to it the intel network told them it was a planned attack, they went the blame the video route, they got caught, you got butthurt.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/

[SkyDekker 1,121]

Quote

So when bush gets bad information from his intel network hes a liar.

When Obama/Hilary purposely lie about the reason for an attack its something we all knew, whats the big deal.

Let's look at the impact oif the lies:

Obama and Hillary lied after 4 Americans died.

Bush lied and because of that lie, 5,000+ Americans died.

Clearly we need a 9th congresional hearing into Benghazi.

[Anvilbrother 0]

So your ok with liars who currently hold office? I personally think if you purposely lie like Hilary and obama did there should be ramifications.

They were told it was a planned attack shortly after and purposely started then continue the lie. Bush went off information he was told was true. Two totally different starts to the outcome you state. One was malicious, the other incompetent.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[rushmc 18]

SkyDekker

Quote

So when bush gets bad information from his intel network hes a liar.

When Obama/Hilary purposely lie about the reason for an attack its something we all knew, whats the big deal.

Let's look at the impact oif the lies:

Obama and Hillary lied after 4 Americans died.

Bush lied and because of that lie, 5,000+ Americans died.

Clearly we need a 9th congresional hearing into Benghazi.

You continue the Bush lied line

How do you like being used?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Anvilbrother 0]

It gets better
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?module=Notification&_r=0

During her 4 year term as the Secretary of State she used a personal email account to conduct official business, and did not use a governmental email address as required nor did she archive her emails as required by the federal records act. Hide much?

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[rushmc 18]

How about all of these people feeding lies to the people.

many before Bush was even a presidential canidate

Quote

Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 18]

Anvilbrother

It gets better
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?module=Notification&_r=0

During her 4 year term as the Secretary of State she used a personal email account to conduct official business, and did not use a governmental email address as required nor did she archive her emails as required by the federal records act. Hide much?

Makes it easy for her to release her goverment emails
I think the courts should go after her private emails now

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Anvilbrother 0]

Hell of a post thanks for that I have not seen it before.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[rushmc 18]

How about this one

BTW
most of these sites are not easy to find on Google
If you are looking for stuff like this find other search engines as google can no longer be trusted IMO

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/saddams-wmds-the-lefts-iraq-lies-exposed/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 18]

http://nation.time.com/2012/09/06/iraq-how-the-cia-says-it-blew-it-on-saddams-wmd/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 18]

Maybe you should research a law signed by Bill Clinton

"H.R. 4655"

I will let you find your own sources

You know
Ones you trust like the Daily Kos or Mother Jones

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 18]

This is a fun site

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/did-democrats-believe-saddam-hussein-had-weapons-of-mass-destruction-did-they-support-going-to-war/question-1975803/?link=ibaf&q=list+of+countries+that+provided+bad+intel+regarding+Iraq+WMDs

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,121]

Quote

How about all of these people feeding lies to the people.

It is like you repeating what you read on newsmax or fox because you honestly believe they couldn't be wrong.