kallend 1,623
rushmc 18
I can do better than that
I have a thread from you from this site!
http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4315723;search_string=Bully;#4315723
I have a thread from you from this site!
http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4315723;search_string=Bully;#4315723
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 1,623
Quote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?Quote
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.I can do better than thatQuote
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
I have a thread from you from this site!
A nice ADMISSION that you can't find a post in THIS THREAD. As usual, you write UNTRUTHS (aka lies) and then try to weasel out when caught....
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 18
QuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the thread
QuoteWell, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 18
Quote
Quote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?Quote
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.I can do better than thatQuote
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
I have a thread from you from this site!
A nice ADMISSION that you can't find a post in THIS THREAD. As usual, you write UNTRUTHS (aka lies) and then try to weasel out when caught.
Opps
You should have waited"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the thread
***Well, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
Where is the "repeating hearsay" in that? Get a dictionary and use it.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuote
Quote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?Quote
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.I can do better than thatQuote
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
I have a thread from you from this site!
A nice ADMISSION that you can't find a post in THIS THREAD. As usual, you write UNTRUTHS (aka lies) and then try to weasel out when caught.
Opps
You should have waited
Negative, you need a dictionary....
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
normiss 622
QuoteJust shoot someone with no witnesses around
I'd go with that part right there.
rushmc 18
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the thread
***Well, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
Where is the hearsay in that? Get a dictionary and use it.
Well then you made it up
Even better
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the thread
***Well, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
Where is the hearsay in that? Get a dictionary and use it.
Well then you made it up
Even better
So you admit you lied. Cool.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 18
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the threadQuoteWell, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
Where is the hearsay in that? Get a dictionary and use it.
Well then you made it up
Even better
So you admit you lied. Cool.
How about this from post 660
***Nope.
I am saying that if a suspect *claims* injury (especially a head injury as is the case here), then the duty of the police is to have that checked out by medical professionals. For liability reasons, if nothing else. That was certainly SOP when I was a sworn LEO some 40 years ago.
Ends up he did get pictures taken and medical attention
I guess that what you post is not hearsay either if you just made this up yourself too
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
Were you there? Or are you just selectively repeating hearsay like most folks in this thead?
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
But if the thread you started in not good enough to make the point
How about YOUR post here, which was the second post of the threadQuoteWell, Florida's "stand your ground" law turns out to be a "get of of jail free" law. Just shoot someone with no witnesses around, and claim self defense.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
Where is the hearsay in that? Get a dictionary and use it.
Well then you made it up
Even better
So you admit you lied. Cool.
How about this from post 660
***Nope.
I am saying that if a suspect *claims* injury (especially a head injury as is the case here), then the duty of the police is to have that checked out by medical professionals. For liability reasons, if nothing else. That was certainly SOP when I was a sworn LEO some 40 years ago.
Ends up he did get pictures taken and medical attention
I guess that what you post is not hearsay either if you just made this up yourself too
Get a dictionary. You clearly need one. That and lessons in reading comprehension.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
normiss 622
normiss 622
Not a race crime either
I wonder how much longer till the defense files a motion to dismiss based on all the evidence...you know...all the reasons he wasn't charged in the first place.
I wonder how much longer till the defense files a motion to dismiss based on all the evidence...you know...all the reasons he wasn't charged in the first place.
Shotgun 1
Following a link from the last link you posted:
I also recall reading that at least one of the investigators wanted to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter from the beginning. Not sure why that didn't happen. (Probably would have avoided all the attention the case ended up getting, with perhaps a faster resolution.)
And I agree it doesn't sound like a race crime. From the link you posted, one of the investigators said that Z had a hero complex but was not a racist. (Though the "hero complex" comment is not exactly helpful to his case.)
QuoteJust over two weeks after the fatal shooting, and less than a month before an arrest was made, police in Sanford, Florida, urged prosecutors to take George Zimmerman into custody after arguing his killing of Trayvon Martin was "ultimately avoidable."
. . .
"The encounter between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin was ultimately avoidable by Zimmerman, if Zimmerman had remained in his vehicle and awaited the arrival of law enforcement, or conversely if he had identified himself to Martin as a concerned citizen and initiated dialog (sic) in an effort to dispel each party's concern" the request said. "There is no indication that Trayvon Martin was involved in any criminal activity."
I also recall reading that at least one of the investigators wanted to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter from the beginning. Not sure why that didn't happen. (Probably would have avoided all the attention the case ended up getting, with perhaps a faster resolution.)
And I agree it doesn't sound like a race crime. From the link you posted, one of the investigators said that Z had a hero complex but was not a racist. (Though the "hero complex" comment is not exactly helpful to his case.)
skypuppy 1
Just don't make no sense to me. How can it be legal to carry a gun for self-defense, but then illegal to use it? Seems you can't have it both ways.
This case really is about removing legal guns from the citizenry.
This case really is about removing legal guns from the citizenry.
If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead.
Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone
Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone
I would say it is a lot like what you have done in THIS thread.
Please post a link to such a post from me in this thread.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.