0
dreamdancer

If you value freedom of speech, then thank an anarchist

Recommended Posts

bit of history...

Quote

On the West Coast, the Wobblies were trying to organize miners, loggers, farm laborers and other migrants who worked at privately owned camps in rural areas. During the off-season the Wobblies would set up soap boxes in front of the office of “sharks,” agents who would extort fees for jobs at these camps – jobs that sometimes did not exist, leaving workers penniless and homeless once they arrived at the work site. Businessmen colluded with politicians, courts and police to try to smash the free speech campaign by banning street speaking, mass arrests, jailings, beatings and vigilante attacks.

The press weighed in with opinions like this San Diego Tribune editorial from March 4, 1912: “Hanging is none too good for them. They would be much better dead, for they are absolutely useless in the human economy; they are the waste material of creation and should be drained off into the sewer of oblivion there to rot in cold obstruction like any other excrement.”

Even when the courts ruled in favor of free speech, local police would arrest street speakers who would be convicted by local courts of charges like disorderly conduct or conspiracy. In Spokane, Washington, the Wobblies successfully used the tactic of filling the jails to force the city to relent. As one speaker would be arrested, another would mount the soapbox. Kohn writes, “Often these inexperienced orators simply climbed up and began to read the United States Constitution, barely completing a few sentences before they were arrested.”



http://www.alternet.org/story/153072/7_occupations_that_changed_us_history/?page=entire
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The press weighed in with opinions like this San Diego Tribune editorial from March 4, 1912: “Hanging is none too good for them. They would be much better dead, for they are absolutely useless in the human economy; they are the waste material of creation and should be drained off into the sewer of oblivion there to rot in cold obstruction like any other excrement.”

I never would have guessed DesertAttorney was writing editorials in 1912!

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Um - if you value freedom of speech, thank the rule of law - like the First Amendment.

Could you be any more contradictory than to credit lawlessness for the rule of law?



A Dreamer might fail to see that, maybe because he's not an American and can't appreciate our history. Anarchy has never prevailed in our United States, but constitutionally protectred freedom of speech always has. Protesters have always benefited from this, whereas anarchists would destroy any such system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

After more than 500 arrests and the failure of brutality to cow the protesters, the city of Spokane agreed to recognize the Wobblies right to free speech, assembly and press. Similar battles were waged in Seattle, Fresno, British Columbia and Kansas City. In San Diego the Wobblies were defeated systematic police violence and “armed vigilante squads” who kidnapped Wobblies arriving by train, and hauled them to the town limits “where hundreds were badly beaten, stripped, tarred and feathered, and run out town,” according to Kohn.

Despite this setback, the Wobbly campaign to open public space to political speech was eventually enshrined in constitutional law.



http://www.alternet.org/story/153072/7_occupations_that_changed_us_history/?page=entire
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The IWW was founded in Chicago in June 1905 at a convention of two hundred socialists, anarchists, and radical trade unionists from all over the United States (mainly the Western Federation of Miners) who were opposed to the policies of the American Federation of Labor (AFL).

The convention, which took place on June 27, 1905, was then referred to as the "Industrial Congress" or the "Industrial Union Convention"—it would later be known as the First Annual Convention of the IWW. It is considered one of the most important events in the history of industrial unionism.

The IWW's first organizers included William D. ("Big Bill") Haywood, Daniel De Leon, Eugene V. Debs, Thomas J Hagerty, Lucy Parsons, "Mother" Mary Harris Jones, Frank Bohn, William Trautmann, Vincent Saint John, Ralph Chaplin, and many others.

The IWW's goal was to promote worker solidarity in the revolutionary struggle to overthrow the employing class; its motto was "an injury to one is an injury to all", which improved upon the 19th century Knights of Labor's creed, "an injury to one is the concern of all." In particular, the IWW was organized because of the belief among many unionists, socialists, anarchists and radicals that the AFL not only had failed to effectively organize the U.S. working class, as only about 5% of all workers belonged to unions in 1905, but also was organizing according to narrow craft principles which divided groups of workers. The Wobblies believed that all workers should organize as a class, a philosophy which is still reflected in the Preamble to the current IWW Constitution:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Workers_of_the_World
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just so I understand, a 1905 Convention of 200 people, reported to be from three different ideologies (so maybe 66 anarchists + or -?) , means your link to a 1912 article and thread title is correct?

Kudo's.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They were never anarchist to begin with. But his misleading thread title got us all in here under the false hope we would learn some thing new.

Matt



Those that are Right Wing Conservatives do have serious issues when it comes to learning anything that conflicts with their belief systems. Anything that challenges the RWC dogma as presented by the corporate media is ALWAYS difficult for them to comprehend. It is part of the DNA of RWCs. They are told what and how to think by their masters, and accept it without question. Any challenge to the dogma is discarded, as thinking independently, with critical analysis and fact checking is not something that is a positive personality trait, to them.

It is no surprise that the history of the IWW is something that there is ZERO knowlege of, among RWCs. The people beat the corporate interests in those days. We'll see if the true patriots among us rise to the top these days, as they did in those days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Those that are Right Wing Conservatives do have serious issues when it comes to learning anything that conflicts with their belief systems. Anything that challenges the RWC dogma as presented by the corporate media is ALWAYS difficult for them to comprehend. It is part of the DNA of RWCs. They are told what and how to think by their masters, and accept it without question. Any challenge to the dogma is discarded, as thinking independently, with critical analysis and fact checking is not something that is a positive personality trait, to them.



This same description could be applied to Berkeley free speechers if an Israeli or other controversial right wing speaker were to come to town. Freedom of speech....so long as we approve of the message.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Those that are Right Wing Conservatives do have serious issues when it comes to learning anything that conflicts with their belief systems.



Well, yes. I believe that the Constitution says what it says, and anybody who claims Freedom of Speech stems from anarchy is going to receive my ridicule and lack of belief.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

if you don't use a limb eventually it'll wither and drop off...



Hence the reason why Americans are free to discuss nazis and all sorts of things that are deemed inappropriate in other countries.

Our limbs are alive and well. The problem is what such things as "freedom of speech" - which means that the US government cannot censor the content of speech - is perverted by many to mean "the freedom to say what I want, where I want, when I want, how I want, and to whomever I want, regardless of all other circumstances."


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

thinking independently, with critical analysis and fact checking is not something that is a positive personality trait, to them.



There's some hatefull rhetoric. Understanding the difference between a labor union and anarchy requires more critical thinking than even you evidently posess. This thread is about freedom of speech vs. anarchy, both of which are mutually exclusive.

Quote

It is no surprise that the history of the IWW is something that there is ZERO knowlege of



Nor has it much historic or political significance. Your own "zero knowledge" seems to be the inability to see the contradiction of the term anarchists applied to those who would organize themselves in a democratic manner. For all their attempt to set themselves apart, the 5000 members of IWW constitute "just another labor union." Hardly important enough to command much attention from anyone other than a left-wing zelot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

They were never anarchist to begin with. But his misleading thread title got us all in here under the false hope we would learn some thing new.

Matt



Those that are Right Wing Conservatives do have serious issues when it comes to learning anything that conflicts with their belief systems. Anything that challenges the RWC dogma as presented by the corporate media is ALWAYS difficult for them to comprehend. It is part of the DNA of RWCs. They are told what and how to think by their masters, and accept it without question. Any challenge to the dogma is discarded, as thinking independently, with critical analysis and fact checking is not something that is a positive personality trait, to them.

It is no surprise that the history of the IWW is something that there is ZERO knowlege of, among RWCs. The people beat the corporate interests in those days. We'll see if the true patriots among us rise to the top these days, as they did in those days.



Say "hi" to Joseph Hilstrom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

as thinking independently, with critical analysis and fact checking is not something that is a positive personality trait, to them.



Do you understand the problem of alleging lack of fact checking and critical analysis when you've failed to identify that the First Amendment - the Rule Of Law - is what gave rise to free speech?

You certainly thought independently - which is why you missed out on the point. You didn't think critically, which is why an inflammatory and accusatory post such as this bounces back to bite you.

You did not think critically. You only thought to critique.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

it has much historic interest and the knowledge of these groups will become popular again...



Yes they may. They will become popular again is the true history of the groups is lost due to the propoganda people like you put out there. They lost popularity in at their time because the populace concluded that they caused more problems than they solved.

When things suck, people tend to put them on the trash heap of history. History repeats itself when the lessons learned are lost.

Note: history demonstrates that ALL groups that purport to act on behalf of workers eventually get either torn apart from within as people jockey for power (which is anathema to equality) or end up shitting on the workers (see Eastern Europe, China, North Korea, Cuba...)


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0