wayneflorida 0 #1 October 20, 2011 What a f------ stupid law. From your Federal, State, and Local family. Increasing the criminal base. http://www.klfy.com/story/15717759/second-hand-dealer-law Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #2 October 20, 2011 WTF over? How can a State make legal tender .... illegal? (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #3 October 20, 2011 This is one of the worst laws I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The correct way to deal with pawn related theft issues is to require that pawn shops get ID from whomever is selling the item. If you read this law in a more inclusive manner, it says you can't sell anything to anyone for cash ever again, unless you are a retail outlet. eta: LA House Bill 195witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BoogeyMan 0 #4 October 20, 2011 Quote This is one of the worst laws I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The correct way to deal with pawn related theft issues is to require that pawn shops get ID from whomever is selling the item. If you read this law in a more inclusive manner, it says you can't sell anything to anyone for cash ever again, unless you are a retail outlet. eta: LA House Bill 195 You're correct. Additionally.... The law is so poorly written that it's practically unenforceable. Laughable.Look at a bill of US currency. It sez: THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE. One could easily make that point that this law "disenfranchises" all US currency.!! ( Still laffing) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #5 October 20, 2011 This is what happens when governments continually overspend and become desperate to recover lost tax revenues. Like a crack head who needs a fix. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #6 October 20, 2011 QuoteThis is one of the worst laws I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The correct way to deal with pawn related theft issues is to require that pawn shops get ID from whomever is selling the item. If you read this law in a more inclusive manner, it says you can't sell anything to anyone for cash ever again, unless you are a retail outlet. eta: LA House Bill 195 This is not about "theft issues". It's about taking an incremental step toward setting up the bureaucratic infrastructure for the collection of sales taxes for new and used items on all sales activities ....public and "private". Private cash sales would be banned because it would create an opportunity to criminally "forget" to report the transaction. Bartering is next. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #7 October 20, 2011 Holy shit! I had to read it twice. I can't believe that this law actually got passed! The legislature was either clueless or asleep at the switch. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #8 October 20, 2011 QuoteThis is one of the worst laws I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The correct way to deal with pawn related theft issues is to require that pawn shops get ID from whomever is selling the item. If you read this law in a more inclusive manner, it says you can't sell anything to anyone for cash ever again, unless you are a retail outlet. eta: LA House Bill 195 It should be great for the furtherence of the police state mentality. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #9 October 20, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteThis is one of the worst laws I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The correct way to deal with pawn related theft issues is to require that pawn shops get ID from whomever is selling the item. If you read this law in a more inclusive manner, it says you can't sell anything to anyone for cash ever again, unless you are a retail outlet. eta: LA House Bill 195 It should be great for the furtherence of the police state mentality. What will the Government think of next? Require photo ID to allow someone to vote. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,378 #10 October 20, 2011 No, the people who passed that law aren't smart enough to think that far ahead. Remember, never ascribe to plotting that which could be accounted for by sheer stupidity. But hey -- it's Louisiana Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertAttorney 0 #11 October 20, 2011 Dammit, what New Orleans hooker takes plastic??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
charlie5 0 #12 October 20, 2011 What the ****. Someone has to be challenging this. The government can't force you to have a bank account. Cash is money. Where is the ACLU?The feather butts bounce off ya like raindrops hitting a battle-star when they come in too fast...kinda funny to watch. - airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #13 October 20, 2011 Quote No, the people who passed that law aren't smart enough to think that far ahead. Remember, never ascribe to plotting that which could be accounted for by sheer stupidity. But hey -- it's Louisiana Wendy P. You're probably right ...they're likely all LSU grads. They've always got some silliness geauxing on over there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #15 October 20, 2011 Quote Dammit, what New Orleans hooker takes plastic??? Does the law apply to goods and services? If so, which applies to the hooker? Is it considered "goods" or services? (If you take "something" home with you I suppose it could be considered a purchase of goods ). Also, does "secondhand" imply "third-hand ......"50th-hand", etc.? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,885 #16 October 20, 2011 >Law Bans Cash for Second Hand Transactions Sounds like someone's gearing up for the Cain 9-9-9 plan! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #17 October 20, 2011 Quote Quote Dammit, what New Orleans hooker takes plastic??? Does the law apply to goods and services? If so, which applies to the hooker? Is it considered "goods" or services? (If you take "something" home with you I suppose it could be considered a purchase of goods ). Also, does "secondhand" imply "third-hand ......"50th-hand", etc.? Nope, I think Hookers would be considered a rental. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #18 October 20, 2011 QuoteNope, I think Hookers would be considered a rental. Maybe, but you don't rent herpes. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #19 October 20, 2011 Let's say that you want to get increases in revenues. Under-the-table transactions are significant problem for governments. However, if the government bans cash, it was obtain a record of the transactions that occurred. it allows the tax man to get to it more easily. Let's also say that you are the banking industry. These cash transactions make it difficult to make money. You say to a legislator, "People commit crimes unless banks are involved." There is a nice piece of legislation to benefit the banks on the basis of public risk. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,885 #20 October 20, 2011 >Let's say that you want to get increases in revenues. Under-the-table >transactions are significant problem for governments. However, if the >government bans cash, it was obtain a record of the transactions that >occurred. it allows the tax man to get to it more easily. That's only true if sales tax is how you get your tax money. (Which is one reason a national sales tax is a bad idea.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #21 October 20, 2011 QuoteQuoteNope, I think Hookers would be considered a rental. Maybe, but you don't rent herpes. Yeah, but you don't tax it either....at least not yet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wayneflorida 0 #22 October 20, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Nope, I think Hookers would be considered a rental. Maybe, but you don't rent herpes. Yeah, but you don't tax it either....at least not yet. You haven't read all 3000+ pages of the new health care law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #23 October 21, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope, I think Hookers would be considered a rental. Maybe, but you don't rent herpes. Yeah, but you don't tax it either....at least not yet. You haven't read all 3000+ pages of the new health care law. That's why I said, "yet". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #24 October 21, 2011 Quotethe bill is targeted at criminals who steal anything from copper to televisions, and sell them for a quick buck. Having a paper trail will make it easier for law enforcement. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Good intention. Fail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #25 October 21, 2011 QuoteWhat a f------ stupid law. From your Federal, State, and Local family. Increasing the criminal base. http://www.klfy.com/story/15717759/second-hand-dealer-law Nice, very nice. More stupid political stuff from the RWCs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
