Recommended Posts
Quotehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/economy/bc.usa.congress.gasoline.reut/
House passes gas price-gouging bill
The profiteering bill aims at preventing gas stations from running up prices that are 'unconscionably excessive.'
A new house bill is aimed at breaking up the big-5 oil companies into 10-12 smaller companies. The theory being that they will become more competitive. I doubt that there is a cause-effect relationship there.
The basic problem was identified as too many companies being allowed to merge. e.g. Exxon-Mobil in 99. They made astounding profits afterward.
Zipp0 1
QuoteQuotehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/economy/bc.usa.congress.gasoline.reut/
House passes gas price-gouging bill
The profiteering bill aims at preventing gas stations from running up prices that are 'unconscionably excessive.'
A new house bill is aimed at breaking up the big-5 oil companies into 10-12 smaller companies. The theory being that they will become more competitive. I doubt that there is a cause-effect relationship there.
The basic problem was identified as too many companies being allowed to merge. e.g. Exxon-Mobil in 99. They made astounding profits afterward.
It sounds like a good idea to me.
--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.
QuoteQuoteQuotehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/economy/bc.usa.congress.gasoline.reut/
House passes gas price-gouging bill
The profiteering bill aims at preventing gas stations from running up prices that are 'unconscionably excessive.'
A new house bill is aimed at breaking up the big-5 oil companies into 10-12 smaller companies. The theory being that they will become more competitive. I doubt that there is a cause-effect relationship there.
The basic problem was identified as too many companies being allowed to merge. e.g. Exxon-Mobil in 99. They made astounding profits afterward.
It sounds like a good idea to me.
My only problem with it is this: I don't see any competition between the current 5. I don't think that it follows that more companies would mean competition.
We have inelastic demand for the product.
They could essentially charge what they wish (and are).
Two companies would just mean another clump of management. One more CEO multi-millionaire.
No value added.
Quotehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/economy/bc.usa.congress.gasoline.reut/
House passes gas price-gouging bill
The profiteering bill aims at preventing gas stations from running up prices that are 'unconscionably excessive.'
Gas station profit is usually on the order of 7-11 cents per gallon even where gas is selling for $3.50! Limits on their markup is going to do nothing to gas prices although it does give voters the illusion that politicians are doing something about high prices.
Did you read my post? They are losing money after the credit card co's are getting their cut. Or so they say.QuoteQuotehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/05/23/news/economy/bc.usa.congress.gasoline.reut/
House passes gas price-gouging bill
The profiteering bill aims at preventing gas stations from running up prices that are 'unconscionably excessive.'
Gas station profit is usually on the order of 7-11 cents per gallon even where gas is selling for $3.50! Limits on their markup is going to do nothing to gas prices although it does give voters the illusion that politicians are doing something about high prices.
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
Whatever the hell that means......And I reply to that w/ THIS>http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=610122 We won't have to worry. Maybe there will be no REAL gas stations left. What ever happened to FULL SERVICE? Oil checked, windows cleaned, gas pumped. I must be getting old. (sigh)
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites