Recommended Posts
QuoteI'm reading a book now about the history of beer brewing in America. Interesting stuff. When the first german brewery pioneers came over (Schlitz, Best, Anheuser, Blatz, Busch) they were vilified. Some of them didn't even speak english! And they were selling this lager crap. It's a MELTING POT! Why the hell didn't they melt? Americans drank whiskey, not lager! They even had the nerve to name one of their early products after a german village - Budweis. Can you imagine anything less american than a bohemian lager, brewed by germans, named after a german town, that went contrary to what every other brewer and distiller of the time was making? No wonder all germans were drunks and spent all their time in beer gardens (and making the vile stuff) instead of working for a living!
Every generation wants to be the last ones in. Fortunately every generation fails in their efforts to slam the door.
______________________________________
The history of beer is quite interesting. Those that brought their brews from Germany were 'Legal' immigrants. I keep seeing a confusion between 'legal' and 'illegal' immigrants. Noone's picking on the 'legals'.
Just a note and you probably knew this... Anheuser-Busch, was the first brewery to use referigerated rail cars to ship their product to the Western States.
FWIW
Chuck
Quote
I keep seeing a confusion between 'legal' and 'illegal' immigrants.
What you have is confusion over the statutory and actual incidence of immigration. Statutory distinctions are not particularly helpful, imo, because they obscure the actual effects of immigration (legal or otherwise) on economics, on demographics etc.
Before the 1920s there was much less restriction on immigration. There was very little legal or illegal, there were just people arriving on the shores. The laws that have been passed since then don't preempt the reasons that people come here, they just interfere with figuring out cause and effect. That makes the period up until the 1920's very attractive to study, because the laws weren't getting in the way as much.
Historically and presently, imo, most of the anti-immigration tripe you see is patent xenophobia. It's unpatriotic, it demonstrates ignorance of our country's history and active malice towards factors that directly contribute to our country's future greatness.
QuoteHistorically and presently, imo, most of the anti-immigration tripe you see is patent xenophobia. It's unpatriotic, it demonstrates ignorance of our country's history and active malice towards factors that directly contribute to our country's future greatness.
What a gem.
QuoteThere was very little legal or illegal, there were just people arriving on the shores.
This one's also a beauty. Perhaps you should read up on the history of immigration. Ever heard of the "anti-coolie act"? Are you familiar with Castle Garden or Ellis Island?
Chuck
rehmwa 2
It's much easier than arguing the merits of today's context vs the appropriate and inappropriate forms of immigration and its positive and negative tradeoffs in today's world.
Today, that means he won because you are supposed to back down to the potential threat of being misrepresented as a 'bad person' by the name calling tactic.
You forgot the back down portion. Please attend a social sensitivity session and come back when you are ready to play by the new rules.
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Quote
they take good jobs away from U.S. Citizens
Case in point, that's an ill-informed remark. When hordes of laborers throng across the border, who do you think gets hired to manage them?
This paper analyzes the effect of immigrant nannies on wage income on natives.
Brush up on your Spanish.
Quote
mad about the fact that more isn't done about 'ILLEGAL' immigrants
Many of the problems are caused by the laws themselves. Our immigration laws are damaging to our economy and to our society. Illegal immigrants are people too, much the same as people who already live here. They suffer many of the same trappings of crime and poverty as existing residents. Would you favor deporting the poor?
Quote
Whatever happened in the 1920's, was a different time in our history.
That's an unsupportable conclusion. Economics applies the same to that time period as today. There are different demographics, different incomes, different politics and different technologies today, but that does not disqualify the economics. Well I suppose the politics will cause some people to just shut off their minds, but such people are ignorant.
QuoteYou missed the point. He made a couple statements and then started vigorous name calling to avoid any constructive debate.
It's much easier than arguing the merits of today's context vs the appropriate and inappropriate forms of immigration and its positive and negative tradeoffs in today's world.
Today, that means he won because you are supposed to back down to the potential threat of being misrepresented as a 'bad person' by the name calling tactic.
You forgot the back down portion. Please attend a social sensitivity session and come back when you are ready to play by the new rules.
______________________________
Aw, crap! I'll report back!
Chuck
Quote
they take good jobs away from U.S. Citizens for lower pay and etc.
More reading on the subject. It's ill-informed remarks like the above, imo, that characterize the anti-immigration position.
QuoteQuote
they take good jobs away from U.S. Citizens
Case in point, that's an ill-informed remark. When hordes of laborers throng across the border, who do you think gets hired to manage them?
This paper analyzes the effect of immigrant nannies on wage income on natives.
Brush up on your Spanish.Quote
mad about the fact that more isn't done about 'ILLEGAL' immigrants
Many of the problems are caused by the laws themselves. Our immigration laws are damaging to our economy and to our society. Illegal immigrants are people too, much the same as people who already live here. They suffer many of the same trappings of crime and poverty as existing residents. Would you favor deporting the poor?Quote
Whatever happened in the 1920's, was a different time in our history.
That's an unsupportable conclusion. Economics applies the same to that time period as today. There are different demographics, different incomes, different politics and different technologies today, but that does not disqualify the economics. Well I suppose the politics will cause some people to just shut off their minds, but such people are ignorant.
____________________________________
I don't know where you get your information but, come down here and live for awhile on the Southwest Border! That bullshit about 'illegals' taking only minnimum wage jobs is just that... bullshit! Big business has bought-off the politicians to get what they want and make their wallets even fatter and the hell with the rest. Check-out the big auto makers up North where you are. Check-out the good paying jobs, such as construction and the like. Then, come-back and tell me how many of those high-paid workers are Hispanic! The way it works is, they get a ride across the border and straight to Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, Millwaukee and etc. They don't want the veggi-picking jobs... they want what you and everyone else wants... the big bucks. Many of the supervisors are Spanish speakers so, no problema. If, you'd quit reading the biased crap that is written on the subject and get out into the 'world' and see for yourself, you just might see, how it really is.
Chuck
That is saying a whole lot.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites