kallend 1,620 #1 July 29, 2004 One of the geniuses of our time: www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5816942... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #2 July 29, 2004 i was just going to post it. Good ole Crick is gone. Think about it - it was only 51 years ago that he and Watson discovered the double-helix design. Now, think of how far DNA research and technology has come in 50 years since that fundamental discovery. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #3 July 29, 2004 I heard they tested, and it wasn't really him.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masher 1 #4 July 30, 2004 QuoteThink about it - it was only 51 years ago that he and Watson discovered the double-helix design. Now, think of how far DNA research and technology has come in 50 years since that fundamental discovery. Don't forget Rosalind Franklin.-- Arching is overrated - Marlies Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,620 #5 July 30, 2004 QuoteQuoteThink about it - it was only 51 years ago that he and Watson discovered the double-helix design. Now, think of how far DNA research and technology has come in 50 years since that fundamental discovery. Don't forget Rosalind Franklin. She's already dead.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masher 1 #6 July 30, 2004 I know that. I was referring to the "Watson and Crick discovered the double-helix design" phrase...-- Arching is overrated - Marlies Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,620 #7 July 30, 2004 QuoteI know that. I was referring to the "Watson and Crick discovered the double-helix design" phrase... Well, Franklin certainly didn't discover it despite sitting on the experimental data for the best part of a year. If she was as smart as the revisionist historians claim, how come she didn't figure it out for herself? Fact is, the model was built in Cambridge by FC & JW, and not in London by MW & RF, and all the structural chemistry (figuring out the hydrogen bonding between the base pairs, etc) was done in Cambridge.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #8 July 30, 2004 Yeah what he saidWatson and Crick are 2 of my heroesThey also have one of the shortest Nobel Prize for Science submisions in history, their entire write up was only about a page longYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steph2 0 #9 August 4, 2004 QuoteWatson and Crick are 2 of my heroes I wouldn't have a job without them! Steph -x- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACMESkydiver 0 #10 August 4, 2004 QuoteI heard they tested, and it wasn't really him. ~Jaye Do not believe that possibly you can escape the reward of your action. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,380 #11 August 4, 2004 Watson and who? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #12 August 5, 2004 QuoteWatson and who? CrickYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
