0
Euroman

Skyhook, what containers?

Recommended Posts

UPT - Vector
Sunpath _ Javelin

Both have the SkuHook (TM)

Mirage has the DRX System

And that it .... no other containers to my knowledge have the SkyHook or similar device

Better never to have met you in my dream than to wake and reach for hands that are not there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aerodyne is working on incorporating the Skyhook system in their contains as well. However, to my knowledge, they do not have an expected release date announced yet.

-syn
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain
a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty
nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was able to order it, but wont be receiving it because its still going through the legal process of them being allowed to sell it. I will be able to ship my container back and have it installed at a later date once they are allowed to install it. LAWYERS there holding every thing up by the sounds of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
During the 2007 PIA Symposium, Relative Workshop/Unite Parachute Technologies announced that they had sold Skyhook licenses to eight other manufacturers.
The license process includes video of 30 test drops, etc.
To date, only Vectors and Javelins (another branch of UPT) are available with Skyhooks.

Mike Johnson (of Mirage Systems) described some of the difficulties that he experienced drop-testing Mirages with Skyhooks. The next thing I knew, MJ had moved on to UPT and Ward Hessing was finalizing the fancy RSL in the Mirage.
I am not sure if Mirage's latest RSL includes Skyhook hardware????

Aerodyne also announced that they were planning to introduce Skyhook, but the date is vague.

Meanwhile, the concept of Main Assisted Reserve Deployment has been around since about 1990. The Sorcerer BASE rig was the first to use a main riser to pull the reserve free-bag out of the container.

Basic Air Concept (in France) sold a similar RSL in their ADVANCE containers for many years, but recently dis-continued???
Apparently Eric Fradet had a hand in designing the fancy French RSL, but Jerome Bunker has been running the BASIC factory for many years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

To date, only Vectors and Javelins (another branch of UPT) are available with Skyhooks.



UPT and SunPath are two separate companies (in the sport market) and are only partners when it comes to Military containers (through CPS). It was because of our Military relationship, that SunPath was able to figure out how to put the SkyHook into their Sport systems.

Everyone (all container manufacturers) is welcome to license the skyhook from Bill Booth granted all the testing is completed and submitted to him for approval.

Mark Klingelhoefer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:)
Mike should be Jeff.

Also the skyhook lanyard must be on the right side & a "Collins Lanyard" is a must.

To add the skyhook system to some h/c in the way Bill Booth & UPT like it to be done will force the other h/c mfg. to run changes in the h/c, reserve ripcord, reserve container inner flaps like Sun Path did and also payment to UPT. ;)

Safe Rigging !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Also the skyhook lanyard must be on the right side & a "Collins Lanyard" is a must.


Hi Shlomo, I saw in another post where you said the Collin's Lanyard was the best part of the Skyhook system, and then this quote above. I'm curious as to why it is a "must" when there are literally tens of thousands of rigs (tandem, student, sport, military) in the field with standard RSL's and no Collin's Lanyard and there doesn't seem to be a rash of broken RSL riser accidents. Maybe I haven't been keeping as close of an eye on incidents as others have, but I don't see it as being a "must have"- more of a "nice to have" with current riser specs. The LOR-2 system was around for years before the Collin's Lanyard to prevent deploying the reserve into 1/2 a main, but it never seemed to catch on with most manufacturers. Was that because it was deemed "not necessary", or maybe the marketing push wasn't quite there?

BTW, the question isn't directed solely at Shlomo, if anyone else wants to put in their $.02, feel free:)
VSE on Facebook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:)
Thanks for that.

I said "ONE of the best" & NOT the best.

I think the "Collins Lanyard" is a great idea.

Yes, a lot of rigs are with RSL & no Collins Lanyard but there are few reasons:

1. The present configuration is new & started when the Sigma came out. before that we had the Vector 1 & 2 Tandem retrofit "Collins Lanyard" with the 900
lb. Dacron line from right main riser to the 2 yellow cables.

2. It is a patented system & you need UPT's approval to use it. ($$$)

3. Most RSL are on the left & the "Collins Lanyard" is on the right side from all technical reasons - New "INFINITY" is on the right as well - think about it. ;)

4. Most left side mfg. will have to change the yoke area & move the RSL to the right side with all needed changes.

5. Old Vector 3 with RSL does not have it as well - that's the way it was made BUT today each Vector 3 or Javelin with an RSL have the "Collins Lanyard" as part of the RSL system. These rigs can also be "Skyhook" retrofited by an UPT / Sun Path Skyhook retrofit approved Master rigger.

We always look forward for better & SAFER systems & the M.R.A.D system with a "Collins Lanyard" is the best setting.

Regarding main riser - they do not fail so often BUT there were some cases in sport & tandem rigs. Even all think that the chances for failure are close to "Zero" it is still good to have just "in case of" you never know what will be on your next jump, with all new lines & ZP fabric & high speeds & low quality of webbing, webbing "over used" or just an uneven hard main deployment - this system can save you.

Better risers will fail before the harness or the skydiver body will fail - main risers are like a fuse in the deployment system & if the RSL side will fail you might be saved from 2 canopie out.

Having tons of Tandem, Students, sport rigs on the market without the system does mean anything - it was not there at the old times, some mfg. will not change the h/c they mfg. - that's all.

:( There are also Tandem Instructors that are
jumping Strong & other tandem systems with the RSL "OFF" - does it is "Smart" ? to my opinon - NO !!!

RSL is a simple device that can save you at a point that from any reason after a "cut away" your action might be slow or involved with "Get Stable" at low altitude or other issues at "mid low" altitude.

Skyhook or any M.A.R.D is better & with the "Collines Lanyard" is even far better.

L.O.R 2 - is a good system - I worked with is a lot & saw it in action - I think the reason it never moved out of PdF rigs is the patent & the cosmetic issue & the use of very specific 1.5 mm double Cypres loop only from PdF BUT it was a "good" advanced improvment in case of one riser failure.

Jump Shack - both side RSL on Racers & Recer Tandems - never went out to other h/c.

Kelly, not all mfg. from all kind of reason agree about all it could be:

1. We did not innvate it so it is ???????????
2. We have to run changes - cost ? sales ? no value.
3. We think that our is better ! why to change ?
4. We do not like to pay $$$ to the innovator or the patent holder.
5. We will innovate a better one - it might be.
6. Other reasons.

Well - time to stop.

Be Safe !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

:)
Kelly, not all mfg. from all kind of reason agree about all it could be:

1. We did not innvate it so it is ???????????
2. We have to run changes - cost ? sales ? no value.
3. We think that our is better ! why to change ?
4. We do not like to pay $$$ to the innovator or the patent holder.
5. We will innovate a better one - it might be.
6. Other reasons.

Well - time to stop.

Be Safe !!!



Shlomo,

You left out the main reason innovations are marketed and promoted. Market share and profit. Booth himself said the skyhook wasn't ready for sport rigs when he introduced it at the symposium. But the sales office was calling customers with rigs in production and offering it. Bill was also one of the only anti RSL manuf. until he had a marketing advantage.

Bill has offered many innovations to the sport. But many also killed lots of people until the bugs were worked out in post marketing changes.
I'm old for my age.
Terry Urban
D-8631
FAA DPRE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
L.O.R 2 - is a good system - I worked with is a lot & saw it in action - I think the reason it never moved out of PdF rigs is the patent & the cosmetic issue & the use of very specific 1.5 mm double Cypres loop only from PdF BUT it was a "good" advanced improvment in case of one riser failure.
Quote


LOR 2 is the ONLY design which guarantees the reserve will not activate until the main has been totally released (not the case with a Collins lanyard associated with a left riser equipped with a three rings systems out of use).
The 20 years patent is over now, but actually there is one other disadvantage on the LOR 2 beside the ones Shlomo wrote, you cannot accomodate a mard device with the LOR 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yes, a lot of rigs are with RSL & no Collins Lanyard but there are few reasons:

1. The present configuration is new & started when the Sigma came out. before that we had the Vector 1 & 2 Tandem retrofit "Collins Lanyard" with the 900
lb. Dacron line from right main riser to the 2 yellow cables.

2. It is a patented system & you need UPT's approval to use it. ($$$)

3. Most RSL are on the left & the "Collins Lanyard" is on the right side from all technical reasons - New "INFINITY" is on the right as well - think about it. ;)


I have thought about it- actually 8-9 years ago I called Bill and asked him about licensing the Collin's Lanyard, and the answer was basically "no". I forget what his reasoning was at the time. So as of today, the Collin's Lanyard is only available as packaged with the skyhook.

Quote

We always look forward for better & SAFER systems & the M.R.A.D system with a "Collins Lanyard" is the best setting.

Regarding main riser - they do not fail so often BUT there were some cases in sport & tandem rigs. Even all think that the chances for failure are close to "Zero" it is still good to have just "in case of" you never know what will be on your next jump, with all new lines & ZP fabric & high speeds & low quality of webbing, webbing "over used" or just an uneven hard main deployment - this system can save you.


To some extent, I agree with you, but if you take the "anythying we can do to save people" to it's logical end, no body is going to be jumping out of airplanes, let alone flying in them:P I guess when I read that a feature is a "must have", I have visions of a lawyer building up a case against a DZ that had an accident with someone wearing one of their student rigs. They come here doing research, see someone with your credentials saying that something is a "must have", and then discovering that that DZ's student rigs don't have it, and building a case that the DZ has "dangerous and outdated" equipment.

Quote

RSL is a simple device that can save you at a point that from any reason after a "cut away" your action might be slow or involved with "Get Stable" at low altitude or other issues at "mid low" altitude.

Skyhook or any M.A.R.D is better & with the "Collines Lanyard" is even far better.


Agreed, except for the Collin's Lanyard making it "far better". The difference in safety on sport rigs between having a Collin's Lanyard and not, all else being equal, is fractions of a percent. I think everyone will agree that the the least safe part of a harness/container system is the jumper wearing it, and that because something new comes along that is "safer" doesn't make everything before it "dangerous". I know that's not your intention, I just want people to think about what they're buying, instead of "buying into the hype" and then thinking that they just need to pull their cutaway handle if they have to get out of the plane at 1000':)
VSE on Facebook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In what containers can you install a Skyhook?



I know this thread is nearly three years old, so here's an update. I asked the same question about sport containers and this is the reply from UPT Vector that I got via email on April 4, 2011:

Quote

The Skyhook is currently only available on Vectors, Javelins and Icon containers.



For tandem, it
Quote

is only available on the Sigma tandem rig.



To break it down:
UPT
Vector 3 Micron
Vector 3 M-Series
Sigma
Student Vector SE

Sun Path
Javelin Odyssey
Student Odyssey

Aerodyne
Icon Sport (not available on Icon Student?).

Here are their sites for easy reference:
http://www.unitedparachutetechnologies.com/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

http://sunpath.com/web_en/

http://www.flyaerodyne.com/fly/ .


Which container would you prefer? And why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Aerodyne
Icon Sport (not available on Icon Student?).



I think but can't confirm that both can have the Skyhook.
The DZ I'm at, has bought a bunch of new Icons for student rigs and rental rigs, and all will have Skyhooks.

(Hard to find anything at all about the Skyhook on Aerodyne's site.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Aerodyne
Icon Sport (not available on Icon Student?).



I think but can't confirm that both can have the Skyhook.
The DZ I'm at, has bought a bunch of new Icons for student rigs and rental rigs, and all will have Skyhooks.

(Hard to find anything at all about the Skyhook on Aerodyne's site.)



Yes, it is available on the Icon Student for $250. I just attempted to order one on their website. The forum won't let me edit my previous post to reflect this though, so I'll just paste it here. Thanks :)

To break it down:
UPT
Vector 3 Micron
Vector 3 M-Series
Sigma
Student Vector SE

Sun Path
Javelin Odyssey
Student Odyssey

Aerodyne
Icon Sport
Icon Student.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Hi Zephyr,

I wonder why they did not list this one:

http://www.marsjev.cz/vyrobky/sportovni-padaky/real-x-with-skyhook.html

JerryBaumchen



Interesting how from pics, manual and coloring site... RealX looks just like a Vector...
http://www.marsjev.cz/products/coloring-real-x-en.htm?lang=en

manual:http://www.marsjev.cz/editor/filestore/File/Manualy%20Anglicky/Real-X.pdf


?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0