DougH 270 #26 March 26, 2015 Not a first unfortunately."The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall" =P Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #27 March 26, 2015 DougHNot a first unfortunately. It was a first for the passengers.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #28 March 26, 2015 DougHNot a first unfortunately. I'm surprised that no one is bringing up the missing MA flight. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,277 #29 March 26, 2015 That doesn't account for the setting of 100 feet for the autopliot though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #30 March 26, 2015 IagoMy money is on a slow cockpit decompression which kept the flight deck closed due to the pressure differential between the main cabin and the flight deck. The door opens OUT into the main cabin. Probably difficult to prove either one with the wreckage unless they find some type of suicide note. Um.... no. That said, since you wanted to put money on it, put me down for $100.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #31 March 26, 2015 How the door locks work... http://www.popsci.com/how-locking-mechanisms-work-airbus-cockpit?dom=tw&src=SOCquade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,685 #32 March 26, 2015 >Reason why US carriers have a two person in cockpit rule. Why do you think that? I regularly see a pilot leave the cockpit to use the bathroom on United, American, Southwest and Alaska. (And unless they snuck a third pilot on when I wasn't watching, they're starting out with two pilots.) They do warn the flight attendants to 'stand guard' when they come out to prevent someone from sneaking up on them though. International United flights do something interesting - they put up a mesh barrier between the cockpit and the first class lavs before the pilot comes out so no one can rush him or anything. However, that wouldn't have helped here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #33 March 26, 2015 IagoMy money is on a slow cockpit decompression which kept the flight deck closed due to the pressure differential between the main cabin and the flight deck. The door opens OUT into the main cabin. Probably difficult to prove either one with the wreckage unless they find some type of suicide note. Now exactly looking good for your pet hypothesis. http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/26/europe/france-germanwings-plane-crash-main/index.html When do I collect my $100?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rifleman 61 #34 March 26, 2015 I'm just wondering whether the rules of vicarious responsibility apply in this case and, if so, are the airline likely to find themselves looking at the wrong end of 149 wrongful death suits.Atheism is a Non-Prophet Organisation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riddler 0 #35 March 26, 2015 Why isn't anyone calling the co-pilot a terrorist?Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 136 #36 March 26, 2015 jclalor***Not a first unfortunately. I'm surprised that no one is bringing up the missing MA flight.the one that was landed in Diego Garcia ?scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,685 #37 March 26, 2015 >I'm just wondering whether the rules of vicarious responsibility apply in this >case and, if so, are the airline likely to find themselves looking at the wrong >end of 149 wrongful death suits. They have an interesting defense here - that a device that their aviation regulatory body required them to install (the cockpit lock) prevented them from saving the aircraft. Interesting that that mandatory lock/door hardening has not prevented any hijackings that we know of, but has contributed to one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #38 March 27, 2015 riflemanI'm just wondering whether the rules of vicarious responsibility apply in this case and, if so, are the airline likely to find themselves looking at the wrong end of 149 wrongful death suits. Tough issue. On the one hand, they passengers looked to the airline. On the other hand, what the copilot apparently did wasn't exactly in the job description. Aside: interesting question as to which law will be used. Plane departed from Spain and crashed in France. But was a German airline. Tickets purchased from many places in the world. Tickets likely had a forum selection clause. But may not be enforceable depending on where an action is brought. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yoink 321 #39 March 27, 2015 riddlerWhy isn't anyone calling the co-pilot a terrorist? Because simply killing people does not a terrorist make. It's quite refreshing to see the news reporters actually waiting until jumping on that bandwagon for a change. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shotgun 1 #40 March 27, 2015 yoink *** What a shitty way to commit suicide if thats true... And here I thought people jumping in front of passenger trains, buses or deliberately going in while skydiving were some fucked up ways to off yourself. Taking out 150+ people while you're at it though... that takes the biscuit. Yes, that puts it into the category of mass murder via "suicide attack." If it does turn out to be certain that it was intentional, I doubt that suicide was his only intention. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SunsetDive 0 #41 March 27, 2015 yoinkIt's quite refreshing to see the news reporters actually waiting until jumping on that bandwagon for a change. Well, they kind of went too far the other way. The usual phrase was something like; "We don't know what happened yet, but we know it wasn't a terrorist bomb." Excuse me? If you don't know what happened, then you can't rule out a bomb. Just because the debris is in a relatively small area, doesn't mean that a bomb didn't bring it down. They may have turned out to be correct in this case, but that's still bad logic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,803 #42 March 27, 2015 SunsetDive Excuse me? If you don't know what happened, then you can't rule out a bomb. False. Some causes can be ruled out without knowing the actual cause. Basic set theory.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #43 March 27, 2015 kallend *** Excuse me? If you don't know what happened, then you can't rule out a bomb. False. Some causes can be ruled out without knowing the actual cause. Basic set theory. Thanks for the breath of logic, Doc. The lack of scattered debris field rules out bombs and inflight breakups. Suicide is a selfish, narcissistic act, IMO. So sad that he didn't consider the other 149 people who wanted to live. I've got no sorrow for him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kadde 0 #44 March 27, 2015 Iago ****** What a shitty way to commit suicide if thats true... And here I thought people jumping in front of passenger trains, buses or deliberately going in while skydiving were some fucked up ways to off yourself. Taking out 150+ people while you're at it though... that takes the biscuit. My money is on a slow cockpit decompression which kept the flight deck closed due to the pressure differential between the main cabin and the flight deck. The door opens OUT into the main cabin. Probably difficult to prove either one with the wreckage unless they find some type of suicide note. They could still hear the co-pilot breathe into the mic in the sound files and ontop of that he had to activly deny them access to the cockpit atleast every 30 seconds through the lock system, how it works can be seen in a link i posted in my previous post. Edit: Ill correct myself - he had to deny them twice during the 8 min - once he presses "Lock" on the panel the crew cannot access the cockpit from outside for 5 min unless he opens the door. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,534 #45 March 27, 2015 History of depression: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/depressed-germanwings-co-pilot-andreas-lubitz-5409439"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,534 #46 March 27, 2015 SunsetDiveIf you don't know what happened, then you can't rule out a bomb. In the field of medicine, there is an established technique of ruling out possibilities when you don't know the cause. It is called "Differential Diagnosis"."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #47 March 27, 2015 yoink***Why isn't anyone calling the co-pilot a terrorist? Because simply killing people does not a terrorist make. It's quite refreshing to see the news reporters actually waiting until jumping on that bandwagon for a change. Please. It's because he's a white non-Muslim. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #48 March 27, 2015 riddlerWhy isn't anyone calling the co-pilot a terrorist? because it was just workplace violence.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 201 #49 March 27, 2015 riddlerWhy isn't anyone calling the co-pilot a terrorist? Unless the side of a mountain is now considered a prime target...Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,277 #50 March 27, 2015 billvon>Reason why US carriers have a two person in cockpit rule. Why do you think that? I regularly see a pilot leave the cockpit to use the bathroom on United, American, Southwest and Alaska. (And unless they snuck a third pilot on when I wasn't watching, they're starting out with two pilots.) They do warn the flight attendants to 'stand guard' when they come out to prevent someone from sneaking up on them though. International United flights do something interesting - they put up a mesh barrier between the cockpit and the first class lavs before the pilot comes out so no one can rush him or anything. However, that wouldn't have helped here. The press is reportig that according to the Air Line Pilots Association every airline in the United States has a plan in place to guarantee there is always more than one person in the cockpit. Sounds like the plans and procedures aren't being followed. My guess is that starting yesterday they all off a sudden became rule followers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites