0
Phil1111

Why the U.S. Should Never Host Another Olympics

Recommended Posts

http://www.outsideonline.com/2031911/why-nobody-wants-host-olympics-america-least-all

Agree. The corruption of the IOC. The IOC decision to pass responsibility on the Russian state sponsored drugging scandal.
The false, concocted studies of all the great and lasting befits of every dollar spent on facilities.

Besides. There is nothing like a free trip for someone to compete somewhere else. Who wants to say home when you can go somewhere exotic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DanG

Mad props to the Paralympics, who banned the whole Russian team. No pussy footing around.



Agree. I feel bad for honest, hard training, Russians who are caught up in this. Sorry for Russian Paralympics competitors who are clean. Its all grossly unfair.

But all Russians should have been banned. Doping cheats the entire sport. The IOC and cycling federations are corrupt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
piisfish

And all American athletes are clean :D:D:D



What does that have to do with a State sanctioned coordinated program with involvement at the highest levels in support and cover? American athletes are about as clean as Swiss athletes.
Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
piisfish

And all American athletes are clean :D:D:D



By and large, they are. If any of them are busted for doping or taking banned drugs, the case is usually they did it on their own. Not the case with the Russians.
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're fooling yourself you think athletes (regardless of nationality) are doing any doping "on their own". It may not be state sanctioned, but doping in today's systems of tests requires a team of accomplices (including coaches, doctors, managers, trainers, etc...).
Remster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remster

You're fooling yourself you think athletes (regardless of nationality) are doing any doping "on their own". It may not be state sanctioned, but doping in today's systems of tests requires a team of accomplices (including coaches, doctors, managers, trainers, etc...).



Agree. Doping today is very sophisticated. Just as the tests to detect it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phil1111

***You're fooling yourself you think athletes (regardless of nationality) are doing any doping "on their own". It may not be state sanctioned, but doping in today's systems of tests requires a team of accomplices (including coaches, doctors, managers, trainers, etc...).



Agree. Doping today is very sophisticated. Just as the tests to detect it.doping is one step ahead. Always.
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gowlerk

Quote

doping is one step ahead. Always.



True. But now they do retests years later when the technology catches up. Cheaters never prosper.

Lance Armstrong is not broke
You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky)
My Life ROCKS!
How's yours doing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You're fooling yourself you think athletes (regardless of nationality) are doing any doping "on their own". It may not be state sanctioned, but doping in today's systems of tests requires a team of accomplices (including coaches, doctors, managers, trainers, etc...).



Not neccessarily. I'm sure it usually does involve a fair bit of that - but the drugs themselves are incredibly easy to come by, most drugs currently being abused have extremely short 'glow times' (hence why they're still being used) and there's a lot of freely available information about microdosing, direct muscle injection, and all the other ways that can be used to beat the tests and the biopassports.

It's not that difficult for an athlete to put together his or her own doping programme without the help of anyone else inside the official system.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remster

You're fooling yourself you think athletes (regardless of nationality) are doing any doping "on their own". It may not be state sanctioned, but doping in today's systems of tests requires a team of accomplices (including coaches, doctors, managers, trainers, etc...).



Everything I've read about cycling indicates that is how it was done...right up until the Festina Affair. At that point the team management adopted the "Sergeant Schultz" approach: "I see nothing!"

i.e. team management wants to know nothing about it, so they cannot be pulled into a scandal.
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gowlerk

Quote

doping is one step ahead. Always.



True. But now they do retests years later when the technology catches up. Cheaters never prosper.
Depends on the country.:D

"RIO DE JANEIRO — Late in 1983, months before they announced a boycott of the Los Angeles Olympics, sports officials of the Soviet Union sent detailed instructions to the head of the nation’s track and field team.

Oral steroid tablets were not enough, they said, to ensure dominance at the Games. The team should also inject its top athletes with three other kinds of anabolic steroids.

Providing precise measurements and timetables for the doping regimens, the officials said they had a sufficient supply of the banned substances on hand at the Research Institute of Physical Culture and Sports in Moscow, a division of the government’s sports committee.

The potent drugs were critical to keeping up with the competition, they wrote in the instructions.

The document — obtained by The New York Times from a former chief medical doctor for Soviet track and field — was signed by Dr. Sergei Portugalov, a Soviet sports doctor who went on to capitalize on a growing interest in new methods of doping....
“We will have the official recommendation and conclusion no later than Dec. 15, 1983,” it continued, suggesting that national sports officials and antidoping authorities were colluding to cover up doping."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/sports/olympics/soviet-doping-plan-russia-rio-games.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=photo-spot-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0